Wednesday, April 24, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

HORROR: Killers & Rapists Were Freed on Parole AFTER Evers Intervened in Balsewicz Case, 2022 List Shows

spot_img

These are the brutal killers and rapists freed in just the first 5 months of 2022. Tony Evers’ Parole Commission hid them from the public until we sued. Some were freed AFTER Evers intervened in the Douglas Balsewicz case, but he stayed silent.

In the first five months of 2022, Gov. Tony Evers’ two-time appointee to the Wisconsin Parole Commission was quietly releasing convicted murderers and rapists at a fast clip – an average of more than 2 per week, Wisconsin Right Now has documented.

These were discretionary paroles. In fact, the 2022 list shows, some of the killers and rapists were freed AFTER Evers, acting under great pressure from a victim’s family and the media, belatedly intervened to stop the release of wife killer Douglas Balsewicz on May 13, 2022, pressuring his Parole Commission Chairman John Tate to resign, which Tate did June 10. Yet the governor stayed silent as the other killers and rapists walked out the prison door, even as he was publicly posturing over Balsewicz around the same time.

We sued to get the 2022 names, with the help of the Wisconsin Institute of Law and Liberty. Last week, after a judge appointed by Evers ruled the Parole Commission had “unjustifiably” refused to release them for months, the list suddenly arrived.

The killers and rapists freed in 2022 included a stranger who grabbed a UW-Eau Claire college student off the street and raped her; a man who hacked a gas station clerk to death with a hatchet and blamed fictional black suspects; a man who swung a toddler wildly by his ankle, smashing the boy’s head like an “eggshell”; a man who plowed a car into a crowd, wounding 30 people; a man involved in the plastic bag murder of a well-known diner owner; a serial rapist who crawled through home windows to terrorize women in Beloit, and a stalker who executed a professor in the parking lot of a Country Kitchen restaurant. And that’s just for starters.

Evers' parole
Part of the 2022 parole list. Ic means paroled out of state via interstate compact.

Paroles can be reversed before an inmate is released with a change of circumstance. On the same exact day that Evers intervened in the Balsewicz case, writing his letter expressing outrage to Tate and asking Tate to reverse the decision, another convicted murderer, Frank Penigar, was walking out a prison door on parole, according to the state Department of Corrections. Penigar beat and stabbed his 65-year-old aunt Doris Watkins to death in Milwaukee in 1996.

Evers' parole

Another horrific example: Four days after Evers asked Tate to rescind the Balsewicz parole, Tate quietly granted parole to Eau Claire rapist David Alliet on a 1st degree sexual assault with a weapon conviction from 1999. Alliet snatched a University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire student off the street and raped her in a horrific stranger attack that left the victim scarred for life. He is a registered sex offender. Evers said nothing.

Alliet was freed on July 6, 2022, according to the state Department of Corrections.

The second week of May 2022 was a busy week. The headlines were clogged with Evers’ expressing concern over Balsewicz’s release, but three days before Evers’ letter, Jesus Bautista, also known as Marcelino Hernandez, walked out a prison door with total silence from the governor. Two other killers were also freed that day.

Bautista made the FBI’s Most Wanted List for a 1993 murder in Green Bay, according to old newspaper articles. Baustista, now 49, stabbed Leonardo Abarca-Guerrero to death in his apartment bedroom; the victim had 12 stab wounds.

Jesus bautista
Jesus bautista

Bautista was arrested when his car almost struck a sheriff’s squad in Mississippi. Bautista had criminal records in Illinois, Michigan, Oregon and California, ICE discovered. He used at least 17 aliases and nine social security numbers. The victim was dating Bautista’s cousin’s ex girlfriend, the Green-Bay Press Gazette reported at the time. Bautista was paroled May 10, 2022, Corrections records show, on a parole grant issued on April 7, 2022. He had not reached his mandatory release date yet. It’s not clear where Bautista is living today, but he was paroled to another state, Commission records show.

In another example, Robert Wallace was freed June 21, 2022, according to the state Department of Corrections, on a first-degree intentional homicide conviction. Tate issued his parole grant THREE DAYS AFTER Balsewicz’s release was reversed. Evers did nothing.

There is a gap in time, often about a month, between when killers are issued parole grants and when they actually walk out a prison door, Tate confirmed at the Balsewicz appeal hearing. During that time, state law allows reversal of such releases (by the chairman, an Evers’ appointee) if new circumstances can be shown. That’s how Balsewicz’s release was stopped; the new circumstances were the fact the victim’s daughter was not notified of the parole hearing. That’s why the DOC dates are a bit later than the parole grant dates in the Parole Commission’s Excel sheet, which runs through the end of May 2022.

Robert wallace
Robert wallace

What did Wallace do? It’s a Marathon County case. Old newspaper articles say that he was convicted, with another man, of beating, raping, jumping on, and murdering their apartment building neighbor, Louise Matti, 62.

Then they lit her mattress on fire. She died of asphyxiation after a “severe beating.” They were angry because Matti locked an apartment building door because she didn’t want drug addicts living next to her, old newspaper articles say. Today 62, Wallace lives in Schofield. It was a discretionary parole.

Who’s on it?

The criminals, freed in discretionary paroles this year, committed some of the most disturbing crimes in Wisconsin history, often targeting women and kids. Evers promised not to release violent criminals, but he reappointed John Tate to chair the Parole Commission in 2021, after he’d already started freeing murderers and rapists. The governor could have withdrawn his nomination at any time. Tate began serving in 2019; he was just nominated to be an independent police monitor in the City of Madison.

The released 2022 killers also include a man who stabbed his wife to death, a Gangster Disciple who shot and killed a man who disrespected him, a man who slew a chef and co-owner of a popular Milwaukee pizza restaurant, a hitman, and more. We will be profiling some of them in depth in the next few weeks at 7 a.m. each morning.

The 2022 parole list is a partial one; it covers January 1, 2022, through May 29, 2022 only. We filed the request in May, which is why it ends there. Again, some of the actual parole dates in the DOC database are later. We did not get the list until October. The 2022 killers, rapists and other violent criminals follow hundreds of similar releases during Evers’ tenure from 2019-2021. We have been profiling one per day for more than a month. Among our findings: In multiple cases, victims’ families were not even aware of the parole hearings, a responsibility of the state Department of Corrections, which is under Evers’ direct control.

What specifically happened in the Alliet rape case? The 21-year-old victim, a University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire student, was walking down an Eau Claire street in 1999 when Alliet, a stranger, grabbed her from behind and dragged her into bushes, according to an old Eau Claire Leader-Telegram story. Alliet said he had a gun, threatened to kill the victim, and she felt a hard object pressed against her head. He raped her. Today he’s 53, a registered sex offender, and living in Eau Claire.

At Alliet’s sentencing, the victim said, “I’ve been so deeply affected by this…I’m so afraid all the time… I have to pay a big price for the rest of my life,” an old newspaper article says. Alliet had not yet reached his mandatory release date when freed.

David alliet
David alliet

Tate issued the Alliet parole grant on May 17, 2022. He was paroled on July 6, 2022, according to the state Department of Corrections.


Marvin Coleman is a serial rapist who was paroled in 2022. He broke into strangers’ homes in Beloit, raping women ages 20 and 80 in 1986, while on probation, old newspaper articles from the time say. He broke into the younger victim’s bathroom window and crawled in the house in order to rape her in the violent stranger attack.

Marvin coleman
Marvin coleman

Today he’s a registered sex offender, age 57, and living in Minneapolis. He was granted parole on May 10, 2022 and released June 21. His mandatory release date was not until 2049.

Some of the 2022 released rapists are child molesters. For example, James Hadley raped an 8-year-old girl. He lives in Kenosha today.


It’s not only the killers and rapists that are egregious cases, either. One paroled violent criminal, Daniel Lavigne, a child abuser, was convicted in 1994 of hostage-taking. He dressed all in black with a ski mask and broke into his estranged girlfriend’s house in the town of Oregon, terrorizing her and her mother for 14 hours, even making a baby suck on a gun.

Daniel lavigne
Daniel lavigne

He then tried to hire a hitman to hurt the prosecutor, a detective said in court. Paroled in March 2022, Lavigne, 54, lives in Madison. He had not reached his mandatory release date when freed. As with the others, the parole was discretionary.


Then there are the killers.

Paroled killer Kelly Conners, a UW-Madison janitor, shot a nationally renowned Wyoming engineering professor and father of four, Dwight Senser, to death. Conners had been stalking his estranged wife, who worked at UW Clinic, for weeks, according to newspaper articles from the time. Conners trailed his estranged wife and the professor, 37, to a Country Kitchen parking lot, where they were going to have breakfast.

Dwight senser
Dwight senser

Conners slapped his wife across the face, and then shot Senser twice in the stomach. When the professor fell to the ground, Conners executed him with a final shot to the head, old newspaper articles say. Conners’ wife had previously accused him of domestic abuse. There is a scholarship in Senser’s memory. The murder occurred in 1996.

Evers' parole

Today Conners, 66, lives in DeForest. He was freed on a discretionary parole in February.


In a case somewhat reminiscent of the Darrell Brooks’ Christmas parade attack, another killer freed in 2022, Shannon Bailey, roared down the sidewalk and drove his car into a crowd outside a pool hall at 50 miles per hour in 1999, injuring 30 people. Doris Lemon, 29, died. Then 24, Bailey was convicted of homicide and six counts of first-degree reckless injury. Bailey, now 47, was paroled in a discretionary release in March. His mandatory release date was not until 12/05/2057. He lives today in Milwaukee.

Shannon bailey
Shannon bailey

In a horrific child abuse death, Dennis Steele, then 21, beat a 3-week-old baby boy, Cody Wayne Meinke, to death when the child would not stop crying. Old newspaper articles say Steele crushed the toddler’s skull “like an eggshell.” He received a life sentence.

Steele “lost it” when the child’s mother went to the store and the toddler wouldn’t stop crying. “He swung the baby by an ankle and smashed him into a hard object fracturing his skull and breaking his ribs, arm and leg,” old newspaper articles say.

The baby was hit repeatedly in the face with enough force to cause the crushing of the skull, eight fractured ribs, jaw and leg and arm fractures. Steele, 54, lives today in Madison. He was released on discretionary parole in February.

Craig Vannieuwenhoven’s wife Louwellen predicted her own death in a restraining order, according to the Green Bay Press-Gazette in a 1997 article.

It says he had threatened to stab her, saying, “there’s going to be another dead woman on Western Avenue.” He then stabbed her to death, one of several domestic murders on the list.

Doug stream
Doug stream

Douglas Stream is also on the list. He was hired by a friend to kill the friend’s foster father, Theodore Agnello, and he did so with close-range shotgun blasts to the chest and head. Paroled on June 14, 2022, from a life sentence, he’s 47 and lives in Milwaukee.


Some of the violent criminals on the 2022 list endangered police officers, including attempted murderer Brian Lawhon, who engaged in a violent shoot-out with New Berlin cops inside a Kohl’s grocery store. His mandatory release date was not until 2048. He was paroled in March 2022. His address is listed by DOC as “none reported.” It appears he moved out of state.

Brian lawhon
Brian lawhon

Some of the released criminals had very problematic histories behind bars. One injured sheriff’s deputies trying to escape. One later struck a correctional officer. Another was involved in a major prison uprising.

These were not model inmates in many cases.


There are many other horrific cases on the list.

Joseph Michalkiewicz, convicted in the murder of George Moore, a 40-year-old Clark gas station clerk in Racine, was another killer freed. Michalkiewiz, then 18, “hacked” the victim “to death with a hatchet,” an old newspaper article says. The murder was a cold case for years; it was solved in 2001 due to new blood tests. The motive was robbery. Michalkiewicz falsely blamed fictional black men for the crime, court records say.  A screwdriver was embedded in the victim’s clothes, and Moore suffered severe injury to the back of his head. George Moore “was savagely murdered in the south side gas station” according to Racine Journal Times.

Victoriano Heredia was one of the men convicted in the high-profile murder of Marshall, Wisconsin, diner owner Charlie Counsell. According to court documents, Heredia, then 17, participated in the murder and was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide, party to a crime. He was part of a gang. At the time, the Capital Times quoted Court Commissioner Howard Hippman as saying the “crime is horrendous, the facts situation is disgusting and the likelihood that (Heredia) would try to flee is absolutely strong.”

Co-defendant Sean White beat Counsell and put a plastic bag over his head, killing him. The article says Heredia admitted to being the person who bound Counsell’s hands and ankles and was present when he was suffocated. The victim’s body was found in a stairwell at his restaurant.

“We will forever have this pain our hearts,” Charlotte Counsell, the victim’s mother, said at the time.” Marshall will never be the same again.” Counsell, a volunteer firefighter and civic leader, owned Marshall Diner, a popular breakfast stop, for 21 years as well as other businesses. He was also a civic leader. Counsell received probation in 1992 after he was convicted of luring teenage boys to the diner basement for sexual activity. He had fired the co-defendant from his dishwashing job before the murder.

“Victoriano Heredia helped (the co-defendant) White beat Charlie. His death was due to a blunt blow to the head and suffocation. Victoriano is just as guilty as White and he deserves a life sentence without parole too,” Charlotte said at the time.

“I feel the State of Wisconsin needs to get capital punishment back in order to stop violent crimes. These men don’t deserve to live. They all admitted they were involved in Charlie’s death. Any one of them could have stopped it. They all deserve life in prison never to walk as free men again. I hope they see Charlie’s face as he pleaded and cried for his life from the first thing in the morning until the last thing at night as they shut their eyes to sleep. That is the only way they will know the pain they have caused us.”

These Were Discretionary Paroles.

Altogether, there are more than 40 killers and rapists on the partial 2022 list, including child molesters. That’s in addition to attempted killers and other violent criminals.

Killers who are serving life sentences do not qualify for mandatory release. Those who were not serving life sentences had not yet reached their mandatory release dates when freed, we confirmed with DOC records. Discretionary paroles under Evers are occurring at a faster rate than they did under Scott Walker, and his appointee paroled more killers in three years than Walker’s appointee did in eight.

Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...

Rep. Janel Brandtjen: Threats to WEC Chief Don’t Help

(The Center Square) – One of the biggest critics of Wisconsin’s election administrator says no one should be threatening her and says threats don’t help fix election integrity issues.

State Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, on Tuesday offered her thoughts after the Wisconsin Elections Commission confirmed elections administrator Meagan Wolfe is receiving extra security protection.

"Threatening Administrator Meagan Wolfe, or any election official, is unacceptable and counterproductive. Venting frustrations on individuals like Wolfe, clerks, or poll workers is not only illegal but also harmful to rebuilding trust in our elections,” Brandtjen said. “Threats only undermine our republic and empower the courts and media. It's essential to address any concerns about election processes through legal channels. Threats have no place in our democracy.”

Brandtjen has been one of Wisconsin’s loudest critics of Wolfe. She led hearings as far back as 2021 into Wolfe’s role in the 2020 election. Brandtjen also led the push to get Wolfe removed from the Elections Commission.

“Wolfe’s term has indeed expired, and according to Wisconsin Statutes 15.61(1)(b)1, she should be removed, but Republicans are too worried about the press or too compromised to follow existing law.” Brandtjen said.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Monday clarified that Wolfe is receiving extra security but refused to offer any details.

“The Wisconsin Elections Commission has had productive conversations about safety and security with state leadership, including the governor’s office, which is tasked with approving security measures for state government officials,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind said in a statement. “Those conversations have resulted in additional security measures being approved for Administrator Wolfe and the WEC when the need arises.”

Brandtjen on Tuesday blamed Wisconsin Republicans, and once again blamed Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, for Wolfe’s continued time on the Elections Commission.

“It's disappointing that Sen. Dan Knodl and Rep. Scott Krug, chairs of the election committees, have not exercised their investigative and subpoena powers. This inaction has allowed the neglect of essential laws, such as providing ballots to individuals declared incompetent, lack of checks in military ballot requests, an insecure online system, and improper guidance on voting for homeless individuals without proper documentation,” she said. “The Legislature, particularly Speaker Vos' control, is responsible for the frustration caused by election irregularities due to their inaction.”

Wisconsin’s local election managers have reported an uptick in threats and angry rhetoric since the 2020 election, and some local election offices have taken extra precautions. But there haven’t been any cases in Wisconsin where someone has acted on an election threat.

Wisconsin’s Largest Business Group Sues Over Evers’ 400-year School Funding Veto

(The Center Square) – There is now a legal challenge to Gov. Tony Evers’ 400-year school funding veto.

The WMC Litigation Center on Monday asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take up their challenge to the governor’s summer veto that increased per-pupil funding for the next four centuries.

“At issue is Gov. Evers’ use of the so-called ‘Vanna White’ or ‘pick-a-letter’ veto,” the group said in a statement. “The governor creatively eliminated specific numbers in a portion of the budget bill that was meant to increase the property tax levy limit for school districts in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 fiscal years. By striking individual digits, the levy limit would instead be increased from the years 2023 to 2425 – or four centuries into the future.”

The WMC Litigation Center is an affiliate of Wisconsin Manufactures & Commerce (WMC), the combined state chamber and manufacturers’ association.

Litigation Center Executive Director Scott Rosenow said while Wisconsin’s governor has an incredibly powerful veto pen, there are limits.

“No Wisconsin governor has the authority to strike individual letters or digits to form a new word or number, except when reducing appropriations,” Rosenow said. “This action is not only unconstitutional on its face, but it is undemocratic because this specific partial veto allows school districts to raise property taxes for the next 400 years without voter approval.”

Wisconsin lawmakers and voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1990 that put limits on the governor’s veto power.

Rosenow and the WMC Litigation Center say the governor’s veto goes beyond those limits.

The legal challenge also raises the constitutional issue that all state spending has to originate with, and be approved by, the legislature.

“In no uncertain terms, 402 years is not less than or part of the two-year duration approved by the Legislature – it is far more,” concluded Rosenow. “The governor overstepped his authority with this partial veto, at the expense of taxpayers, and we believe oversight by the Court is necessary.”

The WMC Litigation Center is asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case as quickly as possible.

Let’s Thank Rep. August, Sen. Wimberger, & WI Voters For Ending Zuckerbucks

Remember when Elon Musk challenged Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match? That fight between Twitter/Threads billionaires...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

‘Scam Trial’: Trump Slams Judge, Says He May Not Let Him Go to Son’s Graduation, Campaign

"This is about election interference; that’s all it’s about" - former President Donald Trump. Former President...
Tammy Baldwin's History

Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin’s History of Going Soft on Iran Draws Renewed Scrunity

In 2012, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, then a U.S....
Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

WILL Says State Agency Acted ‘Unlawfully’ Against Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

"State agency acting unlawfully, enforcing illegally adopted policy to his detriment and potentially hundreds of...