Monday, September 9, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Monday, September 9, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

GOP County Chair Told Adam Steen He Wanted to ‘Wash’ Money for Trump’s Save America PAC [EXCLUSIVE]

spot_img

Why did Trump’s PAC, MyPillow’s Mike Lindell, and state Rep. Janel Brandtjen suddenly give thousands of dollars to a northern Wisconsin GOP county party that is deeply involved with Adam Steen’s campaign?

President Donald Trump’s Save America PAC and MyPillow’s Mike Lindell suddenly gave an obscure northern Wisconsin Republican county party a combined $9,000 in August 2022, and, a short time later, that county party’s chairman told election decertification and Trump-endorsed write-in candidate Adam Steen that he was looking for another county party to “wash” money for Save America to help Steen take out powerful GOP Assembly Speaker Robin Vos.

The comments about washing money came in a conversation recorded this September between Steen and Langlade County GOP Chairman Terry Brand. Recordings, which you can listen to throughout this article, show that Brand and his vice chair are deeply involved in Steen’s determined efforts to oust Vos, the powerful GOP Assembly Speaker based in southeastern Wisconsin who earned Trump’s ire after refusing to decertify the 2020 election.

In an attempt to get Steen elected to Vos’s seat, which narrowly failed, Trump called Vos a Democrat from a stage in Waukesha County this August, even though Vos has a 93% conservative “excellence” ranking as a state legislator by the national CPAC organization in 2021 and 92% over his entire career.

Starting in July, with the primary looming, and as recently as November 2, the Langlade County GOP has directed a steady stream of money to Steen, funneling him at least $25,000 in cash and in-kind printing donations, almost 1/5th of his fundraising. On Oct. 31, Steen reported raising just over $133,000. A large portion of Langlade’s spending this summer went to Steen, who is hoping voters now write in his name on the Nov. 8 ballot.

Trump even went to the extraordinary lengths of recording an endorsement robocall this month for Steen in the state legislative race, helping him target the Republican leader.

Lindell and Trump’s PAC aren’t the only big donations that flooded into rural Langlade. Another big donor in August and July was Alan Blair, an IT executive from Virginia who was described as one of the country’s top donors to election decertification candidates in multiple other states. He maxed out to Steen, giving the candidate $1,000 directly (another $1,100 was returned to him by Steen’s campaign). He gave Langlade County’s GOP $8,000.

Here’s the bottom line: Although it’s legal for individuals or PACS to give county parties money, and county parties may legally give candidates unlimited funds, it is against state law for a PAC or individual to earmark or designate funds to a county party for a specific political candidate.

PACS and individuals are limited by state law to giving a candidate for Assembly $1,000 directly.

The reason for the earmarking statute is so PACS and individuals can not circumvent campaign finance limits by laundering the money through county parties or something else; to boil it down, they can give money, but they can’t tell the party to give it to a specific candidate. Save America and Lindell were both limited by law to directly giving Steen $1,000 each. Neither donated to Steen directly, the latest reports available show. Instead, they gave the money to Langlade; Brand admits that some of it probably ended up with Steen.


Adam steen
Donations to langlade co

To be sure, taking on the entrenched Vos is no easy matter, especially when he controls Assembly purse strings and the opponent, Steen, is little known (at least until Trump endorsed him). Year-to-date, Vos has spent more than $400,000, his campaign finance reports show, including thousands of dollars in support from the state Republican Party. His supporters include lobbyists, GOP heavyweights, business people, and average folks. See his report here.

We started following the Steen money trail a few weeks ago when Wisconsin Right Now was given access to secret recordings that Steen made of phone calls between himself and top Republicans, including state Rep. Janel Brandtjen (R-Menomonee Falls), former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, and the chairs of two county parties, Langlade and Chippewa County. What they all share in common is a steadfast belief that there was serious fraud in the 2020 presidential election and that, as a result, the election should be decertified. Brandtjen called for decertification this July. Standing in the way: Robin Vos.


Adam Steen Talks with Michael Gableman


The phone calls reveal that Brandtjen and the two county party chairs were deeply involved in helping Steen’s campaign, discussing funding and strategy.

Adam steen

Our source is a whistleblower who was concerned that potential campaign finance crimes might be captured on the calls; the source was given access by Steen to the recordings via the source’s own electronic device. The calls do not appear edited. In these calls, Steen also disparaged his own campaign staff and women (we wrote about those conversations previously).

After staffers heard the calls last month, a number of them, including his campaign manager, suddenly quit, and some are raising questions about the campaign finances on the record. In a now-deleted Facebook post, an upset staffer made the dispute public, saying some staffers were going to other campaigns. One-party consent taping is legal in Wisconsin, although the whistleblower claims the app Steen was using also recorded two other people speaking without their knowledge – the whistleblower and another person.

Thomas Koenecke, Steen’s former campaign manager, who gave Vos $1,000 in late September, told Wisconsin Right Now that there was a “complete total lack of transparency” by Steen toward him about finances. “As time went on, I learned more and more about his lack of transparency spending money we didn’t have,” he said. “That was one of the reasons, that and the recordings, that I pulled the pin and got the hell away from it.” He claimed that Steen wanted donors who maxed out to be diverted to Langlade County.

“I said what do we do in a situation like that? He said, ‘you can run things through other county parties.’ I can’t give you the exact verbiage, but the conversation was that we can get around that by going to these other counties, no big deal. It’s not a problem; we can do that.”

We’ve also documented: Two other small northern Wisconsin county GOP parties – Chippewa and Florence – received $5,000 each from Save America in late August; Chippewa County gave the money back to Trump’s PAC after a contentious meeting in which Peter Farrow, the brother of the state Party Chair, and a failed Attorney General candidate, Karen Mueller, raised legal concerns about it.

Adam steen

This angered the Chippewa County Party Chair, Amanda Radle, according to a recorded phone call between her and Steen over printing costs that Chippewa County was going to help pay, exposing a fissure in that county party between traditional Republicans and pro-Trump upstarts. Chippewa County ended up giving Steen $4,000 for direct mail as an in-kind donation, which has angered some in the county party who want it to go to local candidates and don’t understand why the northern Wisconsin party is helping a write-in candidate down south. Steen, the phone calls reveal, has aggressively targeted Republicans in Vos’s district with mailings urging them to write his name in on Tuesday.

The three Wisconsin county parties each received $5,000 from Save America PAC on Aug. 31, 2022, FEC records show.

Neither Chippewa nor Langlade county is anywhere near Vos’s southeastern Wisconsin district; they’re about 150 and 220 miles away in the northern tier of the state. Langlade County’s GOP is based in Antigo, population 8,100, and the Chippewa County GOP is based in Chippewa Falls, population 14,371. Florence County is the second least populous county in the entire state of Wisconsin. There are only 4,558 people who live in the entire county. The county is so far north it borders Michigan. It’s 260 miles away from Burlington, the heart of Vos’s district.

A notation on a Chippewa County GOP treasurer’s document, which we obtained from a source, claims the $5,000 sent to that party by Save America was a “designated” donation. We received the document from a member of the county party, but we have not been able to speak with the person who wrote the notation. She was in attendance at the meeting where the money transfer was debated, we were told.


CamScanner 10-17-2022 20.32

Adam steen


Chippewa County GOP member Peter Farrow, who was at the meeting where the donation was discussed (one phone call reveals the debate was kept out of meeting minutes), recalled that Radle said “something along the lines of, ‘They asked us if they sent the Chippewa Party money, would the Chippewa party send it to blank.'” He said by “they” she was referring to the Trump organization.

He used the word “blank” because he said Radle was vague about who it would be sent to, although party members suspected Steen would be the beneficiary.

“She was vague. I don’t recall if she said where it was going. That was part of the question,” he told WRN. “Several members raised that it might not be legal. I was of a handful that cautioned that they should be very careful; this might be someone trying to skirt campaign finance rules.”

Florence County’s GOP’s money trail is even more curious; that party has not filed a campaign finance report. We traced the Save America donation to that county party only through Federal Election Commission filings for Save America. If that county has taken in or spent any other donations, they weren’t recorded in campaign finance reports.

Langlade County’s report indicates that Florence transferred $5,000 – the exact amount of the Trump donation – to Langlade County on Oct. 21, 2022.

In a recorded phone call with Langlade County GOP vice chair Leonard Boltz, Steen and Boltz went through a list of county parties that might help Steen. Then Steen mentioned Florence County.

“Terry was going to drive over there and talk to him,” said Steen, referring to Langlade chair Terry Brand and a Florence County GOP leader, describing it to Boltz as “the county you had found.”


Adam Steen Talks to Langlade County GOP Vice Chair Leonard Boltz


State Republican Party Chair Paul Farrow, Peter’s brother, told Wisconsin Right Now that the party is going to investigate the expenditures. We called Farrow to ask for comment.

“It appears to me that there may be county parties skirting ethical standards,” he told Wisconsin Right Now. “We will review what counties are doing and hold them accountable if any improprieties are found.”


The Numbers

According to Transparency.org, Blair, the Republican Party of Florence County, Save America, and Michael Lindell make up 4 of the top 6 donors to the Langlade County GOP.

$23,800.00 Jill and Karl Schulz INDIVIDUAL
$8,000.00 Alan Blair INDIVIDUAL
$5,000.00 Republican Party of Florence County ENTITY
$5,000.00 Save America ENTITY
$4,975.00 Leonard Boltz INDIVIDUAL
$4,000.00 Michael Lindell INDIVIDUAL

 

According to campaign finance reports filed with the state of Wisconsin, here is how the money trail flowed:

2/28/22 Kevin Adam Steen gave Steen $1,000

7/7/22 Steen received a $1,987 in-kind donation from Langlade County (BINA Printing in Antigo)

7/13/22 The Steen campaign returned $1,100 to Blair (Blair had given the Steen campaign at least $2,000. Campaign finance limits are $1,000)

7/16/22 Langlade County gave Steen $8,725

7/18/22 Alan Blair gave Langlade County’s GOP $6,000

7/20/22 Steen received a $2,560.05 in-kind donation from Langlade County (American Quik Print)

7/22/22 Steen received a $429.95 in-kind donation from Langlade County (American Quik Print)

7/29/22 Langlade County gave Steen $2,025

8/2/22 Alan Blair gave $2,000 to Langlade County

8/3/22 Mike Lindell gave $4,000 to Langlade County

8/5/22 Langlade County gave Steen $4,000

==Steen lost the Republican primary to Vos on 8/9/22==
==Steen announces a write-in campaign against Vos on 8/19/22==

8/31/22 Save America PAC gave $5,000 to Langlade County GOP

8/31/22 Save America PAC gave $5,000 to Chippewa County GOP

8/31/22 Save America PAC gave $5,000 to Florence County GOP

09/01/22 Langlade County paid $15,000.25 to American Quik Print in Menomonee Falls (it’s not clear what this was for from the reports. However, it’s a printing shop in Menomonee Falls, which is located in Brandtjen’s district in southeastern Wisconsin, hours away from Langlade county. Steen’s report also indicates he uses that print shop, and other in-kind donations from Langlade to Steen went to that print shop).

09/21/22 Langlade County gave Steen $3,000

09/23/22 Chippewa County gave an in-kind donation to Steen for $4,000 in direct mail

10/21/22 Florence County gave Langlade County $5,000 (but didn’t file a campaign finance report on it)

11/2/22 Brandtjen gave Langlade County $3,000

11/2/22 Steen received $3,100 from Langlade County

Langlade County also spent $1,700 in “gifts” to Harry Wait, the Racine County man accused of a felony for illegally obtaining Vos’s ballot to make a point about election integrity vulnerabilities. In the most recent campaign finance report, Langlade gave $7,500 to a variety of other campaign committees. $3,000 of that went to Steen, who got the biggest donation.

Chippewa County also paid $3,000 in September to a North Carolina consultant who spoke to Steen in a recorded phone call about doing social media marketing for him in Vos’s district. It’s not clear what that Chippewa expenditure was for exactly.

The Save America PAC has disbursed more than $68 million. The Wisconsin county party donations are among only 41 disbursements in that category by Save America, some of them big ticket items to places like the Smithsonian or groups in Arizona and Georgia, where there are hotly contested midterm races. There are some other disbursements to local candidates in other states, such as Michigan, but no other donations to county parties in the country.

What sets the Wisconsin effort apart: The money went to county parties, not the candidates; and Trump has endorsed a little-known write-in candidate who is trying to topple a powerful REPUBLICAN leader who opposed election decertification, with the help of the county parties.

Adam Steen lost the August Republican primary to Vos by only about 260 votes and promptly announced he was running in the general election as a write-in. It was almost a shocking upset against a candidate who used to run away with his races. Causing more controversy, Vos hired former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman to investigate state elections, generating piles of bad press in the liberal media, and then fired him after Gableman endorsed Steen. Steen also recorded a call with Gableman, in which Gableman strategizes with him and says he’s in contact with Trump.

Other recorded phone calls reveal that Chippewa County was paying some printing costs for Steen, who had lengthy recorded phone calls about the money with the chairs of Chippewa and Langlade Counties.

Koenecke, a plant manager for an agricultural center, was Steen’s campaign manager after the primary loss. He was one of multiple Adam Steen staffers who suddenly quit in early September.

“He (Steen) did talk about Langlade County,” Koenecke told Wisconsin Right Now.

Koenecke said he asked Steen what they should do if someone gave more than $1,000, over the legal limit, to his campaign.

It gets even more dramatic: Messages sent through Signal, which we have obtained, between Steen campaign workers in mid-August, allege that Steen specifically directed workers to send donors exceeding the $1,000 campaign finance limits to Langlade County’s GOP.


‘Going to Wash That Money’

In a recorded call, Adam Steen and Brand discussed how the Langlade and Chippewa County GOP parties would together pay for a $4,000 piece of direct mail for Steen’s write-in campaign against Vos. It appears the call took place in September 2022.


Adam Steen Talks to Langlade County GOP Chair Terry Brand


“We will worry about this $5,000 by identifying who that other county party is going to be that is going to wash that money for Save America,” Brand told Steen in a recorded conversation about who was going to pay for Steen’s campaign direct mail.

“Yeah,” Steen responded to Brand. Calls indicate the candidate was deeply involved with the county party funding issues.

“We’re playing musical money. You can report to the group so they can know exactly what their funding went to. I like telling people that. It’s beneficial for people to know what they’re doing with their money,” Steen told Brand.

The word before America was garbled because the men briefly spoke over each other in the call, but Brand acknowledged to us in an interview that he said Save America. In that interview, he added that using the word “wash” was inappropriate, and he should have used the word “process” instead.

“There is nothing in there I wouldn’t say at the steps of the Capitol,” he said of the calls with Steen. “I will say it over the PA system in the rotunda.”

He insisted, “I know there’s money laundering going on in places but not here,” calling the word “wash” a “play on words.”

Brand said: “We are processing money that is getting donated to my county party which an individual is able to contribute unlimited amounts of money to a county party.” He said donors to Langlade “support the things I do as a county chairman.”

We asked Brand what Save America’s representative said to him when they contacted him about transferring the money. “Sometimes they might mention some of the candidates they are supporting, ‘please use this to elect these conservative candidates in Wisconsin,'” he said at first, before later flatly denying that the Save America representative told Langlade where or to whom they wanted it spent.

Of donors in general, he said, “Some of the reason they send the money to a county party is they don’t really want people to know who they are supporting.”

“I think Trump is concerned about what happens in Wisconsin if we continue to allow Robin Vos to run roughshod over the Assembly,” said Brand. He acknowledged it was the first time his county party had received money from out-of-state, but he claimed that it’s because his county party has earned a name for itself with its pro-Trump pro-election integrity activism. He denied the money was earmarked.

As for the Lindell donation, Brand said a woman called and said, “I’ve been instructed to make a contribution to your local county party. I just need the process of how to do that.” Asked who did the instructing, he said he assumed Lindell.Adam steen

Brand said he’s “sure” that at least a percentage of the Save America and Lindell money went to Steen, but he said the Langlade party commingles all of its funds together so to “track any dollars directly would be difficult.”

He added that it’s “impossible to track the money.”

He said Steen “asked if we got a donation from Save America after the deposit had been made,” and he said he talks to Brandtjen but not about Save America.


A Contentious Meeting

This same dynamic is playing out in neighboring Chippewa County with different results.

Chippewa County’s party has fractured down the middle between old-school Republicans and people brought into the party by Trump; its current chair, Amanda Radle, is no traditional GOP figure.

In fact, Radle was once accused of running her husband over with a Dodge Durango, causing serious injury, because he was trying to stop her from voting against Republican Gov. Scott Walker in his hotly contested recall election years ago.

On Facebook, Radle says she is Owner Operator at High Fives Towing & Transport LLC.

Bizarrely, a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article at the time quotes Radle’s brother-in-law as saying of the incident, “These crazy liberal nuts are always pulling this crap,” revealing that Amanda’s husband backed Walker, but she did not. She was ultimately convicted of battery.

Adam Steen recorded some of his conversations with Radle too, who has resurfaced as the leader of the Chippewa County GOP to the dismay of the more traditional Republicans in the group, who include Peter Farrow, the brother of state GOP chair Paul Farrow.

In one phone call between Steen and Radle, she revealed that Farrow and former Attorney General candidate Karen Mueller had raised serious concerns about the $5,000 money transfer sent to that county by Trump’s Save America. The money was returned, but they discussed getting it back.

Adam steen

Steen told Radle, “…Don’t muddy the waters, if Save America dies, just let it die. We will use another county party.”


Adam Steen Talks to Chippewa County GOP Chair Amanda Radle


That call revealed that Republican state Rep. Janel Brandtjen was a conduit to Save America. Brandtjen, who was also recorded by Steen, was very involved in assisting Steen’s campaign, even helping design his direct mail and providing strategy.

“I am trying to play with some county parties that are really nice and friendly,” Steen told Brandtjen in one call. Brandtjen is known for her election integrity efforts and adamantly opposes Vos.

A campaign finance report for Langlade County, filed Nov. 5, 2022, shows that Brandtjen’s campaign committee gave the county party $3,000 on Nov. 2.


Adam steen


That same day, Langlade County gave Steen $3,100, according to a last-minute campaign finance report.

Campaign committees are also limited to giving Assembly candidates $1,000, according to the state Ethics Board.

We asked Brand about Brandtjen’s donation and whether any of it went to Steen, as it came in less than a week before the election. “She likes what we do, and we support her efforts,” he said on Nov. 6. “We have not yet allocated any funds that came in last week.”

We contacted Brandtjen when the calls first emerged, and she angrily insisted they were private conversations.

“Janel did tell me if I could get the executive committee on board, that she is sure that the PAC will send the money back,” Radle told Steen of Save America. “She understood, but she was frustrated.”


Adam Steen Talks to Rep. Janel Brandtjen


In phone calls, Brandtjen is so deeply involved in Steen’s campaign that she was even helping him word direct mail pieces. “The sooner we get out the word the better,” she said as they discussed who to send direct mail to using a list.

In one call, Steen expressed that he needed more money. He told Brandtjen “I have 4 sitting in Chippewa” but he wasn’t sure when he was actually getting the check, and he mentioned “Terry” being kind enough to offer him another $3,000. “Did Gableman write you anything?” Brandtjen asked, offering to “call a couple people…we should make the calls this weekend.”

In another call, Brandtjen told Steen she “talked to Amanda,” adding that she did not think the county parties understood how much power they had. “We’re teaching them right,” said Steen.

In yet another call between Steen and Brandtjen, he told her he was working with “one of Trump’s finance guys,” whose first name was Robert. The last name was hard to hear. “Robert’s been helping me a lot,” he said.

Brandtjen said in another tape that “Lenny and Terry” had “caught me at an event,” referring to Brand and Leonard “Lenny” Boltz, the Langlade Party’s vice chair. In that call, she expressed frustration that Radle and another woman were “under the impression that no longer we’re taking money from Save America.”

“So we are going to cut off the president’s money to fair and honest groups that get the opportunities for it?” she asked.

“Karen (Mueller) found out that there’s probes being done right now by Save America on donations,” Steen said, but Brandtjen responded that Save America had “worked really hard to make sure everything is on the up and up.”

In a call, Steen told Brandtjen, “I’m trying to play with some county parties that are really nice and friendly.” He said Chippewa was “a great county, but their board wants to have proof of life.. the board wanted to know that the mailer was ready…I’m trying to play the game.”

Boltz and Steen brainstormed about various county parties to approach. They were trying to remember the name of a county party that would help.

When Boltz noted that “Amanda, she fell through, right?” Steen responded, “I didn’t know that Paul Farrow’s brother was on her committee. That’s the sucky part.”

Boltz concurred that was a problem.

Steen told Boltz, speaking of Brandtjen, that “right after Lindell’s phone got taken, she started wiping everything daily.”

We reached out to Save America, Lindell, Brandtjen, Steen and Florence County. If we receive any comment, we will update this story.


A Fractured Party

The story of how Donald Trump’s PAC ended up giving money to three northern Wisconsin GOP county parties in August of 2022, including Brand’s, is an interesting one that is caught up in the former president’s war against the “establishment,” remnants of the tea party movement, and a desire by some to overturn the 2020 election and shift the power from Madison to the local parties.

Chippewa, Florence, and Langlade Counties are in “Trump country,” the rural parts of the state where Trump signs remain plentiful; Vos and the state party’s leaders are from the more populous southeast, where Trump never ran as strong. In fact, Trump’s presidency reactivated Langlade’s party; it was basically defunct for eight years, Brand told us, but revived, gaining 160 new members in eight months. That’s a lot for Antigo, its headquarters, population 7,779.

Brand describes the landscape this way: There is a battle, he says, for control of county parties between the “old establishment and the new conservatives who came out of the tea party.” In two counties, Chippewa and Langlade, the “tea party have taken over leadership,” he said.

Deeply involved in Steen’s efforts: Brandtjen, the Menomonee Falls Republican who has made election concerns a cottage industry and was recently in the news when she was mailed fake military ballots, allegedly by a deputy election clerk now charged with a felony.

On the other side are conservative leaders like Vos and Paul Farrow, the chairman of the State Republican Party. Decertification, those opposed to it argue, would cost the Republican Party every statewide election and is unconstitutional besides. They believe the best way to reform the state’s elections – which they acknowledge have issues – is to elect a Republican to the governor’s mansion. And therein lies the conflict.

The money transfers have caused rumblings among other county party chairs in Wisconsin, who noticed them too. One was Erin Decker, the chair of Kenosha County’s GOP down south. She is also a Kenosha County supervisor.

We started investigating the money transfers after hearing the Steen recordings with Brand, Radle and Brandtjen. However, we later discovered that Decker had noticed the same campaign finance record trail.

“The Republican Party of Wisconsin has offered numerous treasurer training classes, so any county party treasurer and chair should know the campaign finance laws,” she told us in an interview.

The Blair donations “sparked” her concern. “I noticed he was giving to a different county party up north, and Langlade was going to Steen,” she said.

Decker believed some of the money transfers in the Steen and Langlade reports looked like “earmarking and that’s a violation of campaign finance laws.”

Decker alleged: “It’s obvious that people were shopping around for county parties that had a bone to pick with Robin and don’t want to see him win.”

Although Brand and Radle deny doing so, Decker alleged: “They’re willing to break the law to see that Robin Vos loses. It gives the Republican Party a horrible name.”

She said that she called the state Republican Party of Wisconsin “when I discovered this.” She told the state party: “You have to tell them they can’t do this; it’s illegal.”

Brand and Radle deny that any money to Steen was earmarked.

To Brand, it’s perfectly understandable why a PAC run by the former Leader of the Free World and a well-known national personality like the “My Pillow Guy” would choose Langlade County for its sudden largesse.

“We don’t sit on our ass like the other 71 counties,” he told us. “They sit back and take the crap of Robin Vos. We get involved.” Asked how Save America and Lindell learned about Langlade County, Brand suggested that they probably Googled it.

In 2022, Brand’s county party passed a resolution saying Joe Biden was not “legitimately elected” and formally rejecting certification of the 2020 election results. His central beef with Vos, though, focuses less on the election and more on how the Republican speaker controls money, deciding which local candidates to help and which to dry up. Devil’s advocates would argue that this is how Vos keeps majorities, his central role as speaker, but Brand sees it as authoritarian control.

Trump and Lindell had not given to the county parties before, a review of campaign finance records shows.


Text Exchanges

Two former Steen campaign workers – including his campaign manager – told Wisconsin Right Now that Steen told them that any donations over the $1,000 legal limit should be run through county parties. One provided us with a text exchange through Signal from August 16 that indicates that donations over the limit should go to Langlade County’s GOP. They were written before multiple Steen staffers quit en masse after hearing the recordings.

“Adam, told me that RPLC info is not public and is only for people that donated over $1,000. I didn’t look at yesterday’s donations yet but up through the 13th everyone who donated more than a $1,000 has been given that info,” reads one message, sent over Signal. “He said for now Langlade…” said the response. RPLC refers to the Republican Party of Langlade County. Another text says “payable to RPLC…This is for anything donated over $1,000 in a calendar year.”

In a phone call, Steen and Radle spoke about the party helping pay a $4,000 invoice for printing. They said that money didn’t come from Save America, though. However, in the call, Radle told Steen the Save America money was being used to “pay an invoice.”

“I have to be honest I don’t know what Save America is; I know it’s some kind of PAC affiliated with Trump,” Radle told Steen. “…They sent us funds, and we were sending it somewhere else to pay an invoice, and Peter Farrow jumped all over that, and it sounds like campaign finance laws are trying to be broken, so, here is where the issue came in with my board.”


Adam Steen Talks to Chippewa County GOP Chair Amanda Radle


We asked Radle about all of this and she sent us this statement, “We had the opportunity to receive the funds from Save America, but ultimately we declined them. Receiving and distributing the funds is legally, ethically, and morally sound. Our decision was based on the lack of unanimity within the leadership.”

Another Adam Steen phone call captures the Langlade Chair indicating they expected Chippewa County to kick in $1,000 for Steen’s direct mail.

Steen and Brand trashed Peter Farrow by name in a phone call, and in another call Radle discussed the meeting where the Save America transfer became a hot topic.

After hearing this call, we contacted Peter Farrow and asked whether he was at that meeting, which occurred in September 2022. He said there were about 30 people in the room.

“At the meeting, I don’t remember who. Someone questioned the $5,000 that came in from that organization and where it went,” he said. “And she (Radle) told us the organization that it came from but was vague on where it went. It sounded like it had already been disbursed by the time we had our club meeting in the middle of September.”

We asked which organization gave the $5,000. “Amanda Radle, she said it was coming from one of the Trump organizations. It was clear it was coming from the Trump circle,” he said, adding, “That’s a huge amount for a county party. We never got a check from Save America before as far as I recall.”

When we told Peter Farrow that he was trashed by name in a recording, he said, “I obviously was enough of a pain that they talk about me by name, which is hysterical.”

Farrow said he was speaking out on the record because “campaign rules exist for a reason, and they are the same reasons that the election rules that many people have had concerns that were broken last time exist. There is no ends justifying any means. If people don’t follow rules, they don’t follow rules, and it’s all wrong. I’ve always been a stickler for the rules. Someone else breaking some rule is never justification for you to break something else.”

He added: “We should be spending all of our money to defeat Democrats.”

Farrow believes the money transfers to the Langlade County Republican Party don’t pass the smell test, either. It is inexplicable that a county party in northern Wisconsin would worry about a write-in campaign against a sitting Republican in another area of the state, he said.

Peter and Paul Farrow are the sons of former Lt. Gov. Margaret Farrow, an icon in GOP circles.

Paul Farrow said the allegations “sound as bad as the Zuckerbuck dollars.” If there was nothing improper going on, he said, why wouldn’t the PAC or individuals have just given the candidate the money, within limits? To be clear, we contacted the Farrows after being given access to the recordings by the whistleblower.

Koenecke, the campaign manager, said he thought it was “odd” when he learned Steen was recording so many phone conversations.

He added, “I was trusting him that he knew what he was doing as far as campaign finance laws go; that evaporated in short order.”

“My eyebrow was up from the very beginning. I am not quite sure what he was up to,” said the former campaign manager.

“I heard him having these conversations with people I call grifters, from South Carolina, California, North Carolina. I’m like, ‘You’re running a local campaign here. What the hell are you doing with all of these people. Where is all this money coming from? I am not comfortable. I can’t get a straight answer. I don’t know who is paying what. Where in the hell are you getting all this money?’”

He said Adam Steen kept saying “Lindell was going to give me money.” One of the recorded phone calls captures Steen speaking with a woman from Lindell’s office about the possibility of getting Lindell to Wisconsin to stump for him.

A long-time former Steen campaign volunteer told Wisconsin Right Now: “We were told specifically from Adam, and so I can recall he said it, it came out of his mouth, it’s 100% certain. He said all donations over $1,000 went to Langlade County. We were worried that a donation would come in and be too high. He said, ‘It’s got to go to Langlade County.’ He said it more than once and to multiple people.”

She does not want to be named in the story because she fears harassment from other Steen supporters. She said volunteers were aware of campaign finance limits of $1,000. “That was explained to us explicitly.”

She said that Chippewa County “took more the role of buying things with the money versus Langlade; we knew that’s where big money went.”


Brand & Adam Steen Discuss the Langlade County Party’s Role

After the washing comment, in their recorded phone call, Langlade’s chair Brand and Steen talked about a court hearing involving Gableman.

One comment Adam Steen made in the recording indicates that Janel Brandjten was a conduit back to Save America.

“I’ll leave that to you. That information needs to get to Janel so she can get it to Save America. Otherwise we’re not sweating too much,” said Steen, referring to Brandjen. It wasn’t clear whether that information was the Gableman hearing or the printing costs.

“I’ll take some checks with me, some envelopes and stamps, so I can get this in the mail to you,” Brand responded.

“Moving on boss, keep pounding this guy,” Steen told Brand, referring to Vos.

“Sounds good,” said Brand.

In the recording, Steen also said to Brand, “I talked to Amanda, and she’s having an executive meeting on Thursday. They have no problem with the money for me, the $4,000 they’re going to give me. I called the printer.” The conversation appears to have occurred before the meeting where some people wanted the Save America money refunded.


Adam Steen Talks to Langlade County GOP Chair Terry Brand


There are lengthy conversations between Steen and Brand about printing costs, some discussing what Amanda would contribute.

Adam Steen continued, “If you can kind of…either decide to hold on to your three or send it to us to the campaign and then we can use it for mailers or for sign material, Amanda Radle said they are okay with sending it out to the printer. It’s just not going to happen tomorrow. If you’re okay with sending it down by us that would be just fine.”

He said he was trying to get money to hold an event with Lindell. Steen then complained about the cost of big events.

“If I can recover the 5 grand and break even, I’ll be happy to give people a picture with Lindell,” he explained to Brand. “I didn’t realize how expensive these events are.”

“I’ll get that in the mail today,” said Brand.

In a second phone call, Steen said he spoke to Amanda, who “ended up talking to” Brandtjen.

Steen revealed to Brand that “apparently Paul Farrow’s brother Peter is in their group somewhere… I had no idea. I didn’t realize it was Paul Farrow’s brother.” He compared him to a “henhouse” and “fox.”

“He’s a pain in the butt,” said Brand.

Steen discussed Radle being willing to pay for printing costs.

Steen then said: “Is it easier for your purposes for accounting if we’re playing musical money here right? No one cares where the money goes, just whether it comes from.”


Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Loader Loading...
Ead logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
reagan movie review

Reagan Movie Review: Why the Elite, Snobby Film Critics Are Wrong

Was Ronald Reagan perfect? No. But he was the perfect man for the time. Was...
kamala dnc

How Kamalanomics Trickles Down [Up Against the Wall]

First, I have to say a word to President Trump. Dude, the next time you’re...
prairie du chien police

Suspected Venezuelan Gangster Attacked Wisconsin Juvenile, Prairie du Chien PD Says

A suspected Venezualan gang member who is not a U.S. citizen now has an ICE...

Communicating With Gen Z [Up Against the Wall]

This is an opinion column. I do feel kind of bad for Gen Z. They’ve had...

Milwaukee Police Respond to Call That Rioting Students Took Over a School

Milwaukee police responded en masse after a caller stated that rioting students "have taken over"...

BREAKING: Milwaukee Police Search for Suspect in Serious Hit & Run of 2 Pedestrians

Milwaukee Police are looking for a suspect wanted for recklessly endangering safety and hit &...
Rebecca Cooke

We’ve Recovered Leftist Political ‘Consultant’ Rebecca Cooke’s Deleted Website

Thank goodness for the Wayback Machine. It's captured the political website that leftist Wisconsin Congressional...
green bay packers brazil

Green Bay Packers Should Refuse to Play in Brazil in Support of Free Speech: State Rep

Wisconsin state Rep. John Macco is calling on the Green Bay Packers to move Friday's...

Report: Unions Pursue Law Changes to Boost Membership

Unions see a clear path through the legislature to boost membership after several legal challenges saw workers leave in droves.

This, according to a new report released Wednesday that grades public sector labor laws across the nation. The data was compiled by the Commonwealth Foundation, a policy group that focuses on fiscal conservancy.

David Osborne, senior fellow for labor policy at the foundation, said during a media briefing that government privatization, changing demographics and a 2018 Supreme Court decision, Janus v. AFSCME Council 31, have caused membership rates across the nation’s four largest public sector unions to fall more than 320,000 over the last five years.

The decline represents $106.8 million in annual dues and fees, according to the report.

“The overarching theme is that the unions have really responded to the membership losses since JANUS to drive up union membership,” Osborne said.

In the JANUS decision, courts held that unions could no longer collect “fair share” dues from non-members who benefit from collective bargaining agreements. Follow-up litigation has challenged the cumbersome process many former members had to overcome to leave the union and recoup dues improperly withheld.

In the report, states known as union “strongholds” scored lower than others that have enacted collective bargaining reforms.

Illinois, Michigan and Maryland stood out for unprecedented reforms that, in some cases, have constitutionally rooted union protections and tipped the scales in favor of executives, according to the report.

Illinois, for example, enshrined collective bargaining rights into the state constitution, which extended unionizing rights to every workplace, including those once considered inappropriate. Osborne said the “experiment could have really disastrous implications,” such as raising taxes to fund “outrageous” union demands.

He pointed to recent collective bargaining negotiations with Chicago Public Schools, during which leadership asked for abortion care access, affordable housing, homeless shelters in schools and all-electric bus fleets.

“The legislature wouldn’t have any opportunity to overrule that behavior,” Osborne said. “It would take a constitutional amendment to correct that balance.”

California, Pennsylvania and Vermont have considered similar amendments – the latter two more seriously, he added.

In Michigan, which slipped from a “B” to a “D” over the last two years, lawmakers repealed the“paycheck protection” law – which prevents public payroll systems from deducting union dues and political contributions – as was the state’s Right to Work provision. The state also gives unions access to employees’ personal information.

Some 13 other states give unions the same data collection power. In Hawaii, unions even store Social Security numbers to verify workers’ identities. The report says the practice leaves information vulnerable to ransomware attacks – like one that happened earlier this year in California.

Maryland, Delaware and California also offer tax incentives for union membership as way to boost recruits. While Delaware’s labor laws earned a "D" in the report, Maryland and Delaware – along with Illinois, Oregon and Washington – earned an “F” grading.

The nation’s four largest public sector unions – the American Federation of Teachers; the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the National Education Association; and the Service Employees International Union – collectively represent 6.6 million workers.

AFSCME, according to records submitted to the U.S. Department of Labor, has lost 7.5% of its members since 2017, outpacing the other three unions between 2.8 percentage points and 4 percentage points.

“I do think JANUS is playing a big role in this,” said Andrew Holman, a policy analyst at the Commonwealth Foundation. “And I think after the decision, people are becoming more and more aware of what their dollars are being put toward and are saying, 'I don’t want to be a part of this.'”

Osborne said 60% of membership fees, albeit funneled through outside organizations, support political causes. Even though members may be aligned ideologically, many feel “uncomfortable” with resolutions that take positions on issues like the war in Gaza or abortion rights.

Unions have refuted this claim in the past, such as the Pennsylvania State Education Association, which is under review by several state agencies for alleged funneling of union dues to support Gov. Josh Shapiro's 2022 campaign. The state's labor laws scored a "D" in the report.

“None of the issues seem to relate to what it is to be a teacher, for instance, so many of the members come home feeling like my union has really taken a stance on these political matters that have divided the workplace rather than united it,” Osborne said.

Of the highest-ranking states, Florida “sets a new gold standard,” according to the foundation. The most impactful reform, Osborne said, requires unions to run for “recertification” once membership drops below 60%. This means workers can decide whether to keep representation.

“We’ve seen a bunch of unions fail to file for reelection because they know they’ll lose,” Osborne said. “This ends up removing a union that never had majority support to begin with.”

Wisconsin and Iowa also require recertification. Unions in other states – like Pennsylvania, Illinois, New York and California – have never run for “reelection” since organizing in the 1970s.

full rfk jr video

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Files Lawsuit to Remove His Name From Wisconsin Ballot

(The Center Square) – Former Independent party presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Election Commission to remove his name from the state’s ballot this November, part of his ongoing battle to exit from races in swing states.

The case argues that, absent a compelling reason, different treatment for third party candidates violates the Equal Protection Clause and Kennedy’s First Amendment rights. It claims the different deadlines for ballot withdrawal for Democrat and Republican candidates versus third-party candidates–September 3 for the former and August 6 for the latter–are unlawfully discriminatory.

“Third parties can’t be treated differently and they can’t be discriminated against. Yet that’s what happened here. The Republicans and the Democrats have until today at 5 p.m. to withdraw their nominees and replace them with someone else,” the lawsuit argues. “But those rules don’t apply to independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr…He has not been treated fairly or equally with the other presidential candidates who declared and ran for the presidency and have since wanted to withdraw.”

In its certification of presidential candidates last week, the WEC voted 5-1 to put Kennedy on the ballot, despite his withdrawal and endorsement of Republican nominee and former president Donald Trump. Following the decision, county clerks were authorized to begin printing ballots.

But Kennedy has argued his request is not unreasonable since Wisconsin election law already provides exceptions for candidate removal post-certification, including in the case of candidate death or for personal and health reasons–provided the Democrat or Republican candidate meets the September 3rd deadline.

“Kennedy has (like President Biden) decided that for associational and expressive reasons, he does not want to run for President anymore. The deadlines prevent him from withdrawing, even though the Democratic and Republican Parties (at least in theory) could provide a different nominee to the Commission today,” the case says, arguing this proves “The Commission cannot claim any compelling state interest in forcing Independent candidates to file paperwork a month earlier.”

Due to these reasons, the lawsuit requests a stay on the WEC’s ruling and for Dane County Circuit Court to issue an order barring the agency from placing Kennedy’s name on the ballot.

Alexa Gives VERY Biased Responses, Pushing Kamala Harris’s Candidacy | WATCH

We asked Amazon's Alexa device: "Why should I vote for Donald Trump? Why should I...

Chad Richards: Suspect Identified in the Shooting Death of a UW-Whitewater Student Kara Welsh

UPDATE: Chad Richards appeared in court Tuesday, where a judge set a bond of $1...
american hostages still held by Hamas

BRING THEM HOME: These Are the 4 American Hostages Still Held by Hamas [FULL LIST]

An American hostage, Hersh Goldberg-Polin, was horrifically executed by Hamas while America's President, Joe Biden,...
kamala harris cnn interview

Yes, Kamala Harris’s CNN Interview Was a Total Train Wreck [VIDEO]

Kamala Harris and her emotional support governor, Tim Walz, sat down for her only interview...

Trump Echo: California Republicans Propose No Tax on Tips, Democrats Vote NO

In a mirror of national politics, California Republicans followed former President Donald Trump’s lead by proposing to end taxes on tips. While Vice President Kamala Harris, who formerly represented California in the U.S. Senate, embraced the measure, California Democrats said no, shooting down the proposed amendment in the California Senate.

“Even Trump and Harris both say we should eliminate the ‘tip tax,’” said the California Senate Republican Caucus in a statement.

Soon after Trump announced his proposal to a crowd in Nevada, which has the highest percentage of tipped workers in the nation, Harris also came out in favor of the proposal. The Budget Lab at Yale University reports there are approximately 4 million tipped workers — 2.5% of all workers nationwide. Many tipped workers earn less than the minimum wage, and thus earn the lion's share of their income from tips. Some higher-paid tipped professions such as barbers and hair stylists would also benefit from this rule change.

The bipartisan Committee for Responsible Federal Budget says this proposal would likely reduce government revenue by approximately $15 to $25 billion per year.

In the California Senate, Democrats — except for Senate President Pro Tempore Senator Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, and State Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, who abstained, voted to put aside the amendment, while all nine Republicans voted for it.

With the legislature having narrowly closed a $47 billion budget shortfall this year through cuts, deferrals, and shifts, it's unclear what additional measures the state would need to take to offset revenue losses from a potential state-level exemption.

kamala dnc

Flip-Flop? Harris Under Scrutiny for Changes to Past Stances

Vice President Kamala Harris was once anti-fracking and opposed to former President Donald Trump’s tough immigration policies.

Now, it’s apparently a different story.

In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash this week, Harris was asked about the change in her stance on fracking. Fracking is a major industry and economic driver in the swing state of Pennsylvania, a state where Harris is up a slim 0.8%, according to Real Clear Politics’ polling average.

Harris said during a town hall in 2019 that there is “no question” she supports banning fracking. During the CNN interview, Harris said she does not want to ban fracking and that she “made that clear on the debate stage in 2020.”

“As vice president I did not ban fracking, and as president I will not ban fracking,” Harris said.

Harris has previously said she supports a ban on fracking, offshore drilling, and plastic straws. She also said she supports passing the Green New Deal, which includes a treasure trove of far-left energy policies.

Harris’ inconsistency on the fracking issue has drawn criticism.

”If Kamala Harris can so quickly reject her firm energy positions from the past, there is no telling how quickly she’ll renounce today’s positions in the future,” Daniel Turner, who leads the energy workers advocacy group, Power the Future, said in a statement. “Just like Vice President Harris abandoned her support for Joe Biden after telling the American people he was perfectly fine, she will abandon any position she pretends to have now. Harris is bankrolled by green billionaires who want to ensure the funding of their pet projects continue, so it’s beyond clear that she doesn’t care about the truth of her energy positions, she cares only about keeping the tax dollars flowing.”

During the same CNN interview, Harris said those who illegally cross the border should face “consequences.”

“We have laws that have to be followed and enforced that address and deal with people who cross our border illegally,” Harris said. “And there should be consequence. And let’s be clear, in this race, I’m the only person who has prosecuted transnational criminal organizations who traffic in guns, drugs, and human beings. I’m the only person in this race who actually served a border state as attorney general to enforce our laws. And I would enforce our laws as president going forward. I recognize the problem.”

However, Harris posted on then-Twitter in 2017 that “an undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.”

Harris had also mocked Trump’s border wall during the Trump administration as a “vanity project” but has now expressed her support for a Senate immigration bill that allocates $650 million for building the border wall.

“Funding Trump’s unrealistic border wall would be a gross misuse of taxpayer money,” Harris wrote on Twitter in April of 2018.

A year earlier, Harris called Trump’s wall a “ stupid use of money” and pledged to “block any funding for it.”

It is possible the border wall funding was a concession Harris was willing to make rather than a policy goal.

However, any policy changes are notable since Harris has offered unusually few details on her platform if she were elected president.

Harris’ main campaign website offers no policy platform, and her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention largely avoided policy specifics.

Trump took a jab at Harris at a recent rally on this point.

“Now she’s saying ‘oh we want to build a strong border,’” Trump told his supporters. “Where has she been for three and a half years as we took in 20 million people, many of them horrible criminals?”

Harris is not alone in announcing new policy ideas, apparently to appeal to moderate voters. Trump announced at a recent rally that IVF treatments should be free to women, either paid for by insurers or the government.

trump vs harris

Poll: Trump Inches Ahead; Hovde Surges Forward in Wisconsin

(The Center Square) – A new Emerson College poll of likely voters reveals some changes in Midwest swing states.

Former President Donald Trump has a slim lead over Vice President Kamala Harris in Wisconsin, 49% to 48%, while Harris slightly widened her lead over Trump in Michigan at 50% to 47%.

Independent voters are largely veering towards Harris, with 46% of Michigan Independents choosing Harris, versus 43% for Trump. In Wisconsin, the divide is starker, with 52% choosing Harris and 43% Trump.

Defying previous trends, Republican U.S. Senate candidate for Wisconsin Eric Hovde has improved to 48%, only 1 percentage point behind incumbent Sen. Tammy Baldwin, his opponent.

“We’ve had huge movement in the last 30 days,” Hovde said in a video on X following the poll’s release. “Wisconsin is the number one battleground. Whoever wins Wisconsin will control the White House, and if I win, we’ll not only take control of the U.S. Senate for the next two years, but potentially for the next four years.”

Support for the U.S. Senate candidates in Michigan remains relatively stable, with Democrat Rep. Elissa Slotkin still leading Republican former Rep. Mike Rogers 47% to 41%.

While the economy remains all respondents’ top concern in both states, the issue of immigration has fallen in importance, replaced by “threats to democracy” and housing affordability.

Results also showed voters under 30 overwhelmingly favor the Democratic presidential candidate, with Harris pulling 62% of support in Michigan and 54% in Wisconsin, compared to Trump’s 32% and 41%, respectively.

The survey, conducted August 25-28, included 800 Michigan voters with a +/-3.4% margin of error, and 850 Wisconsin voters with a +/-3.3% margin of error.

zuckerberg censorship

Zuckerberg Censors Kamala Harris Criticism in Battleground Wisconsin After CNN Interview

Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook is actively censoring criticism of Vice President Kamala Harris's CNN interview in...
tammy baldwin

Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin Is in a Free Fall as Lead Shrinks to Only 1.2 percent: Poll

A new poll by Emerson College/The Hill shows that Senate Democrat Tammy Baldwin's lead over...
Milwaukee Public Schools Breakup Bill

Sen. John Jagler Frustrated With NO Officers in Milwaukee Public Schools

(The Center Square) – State Sen. John Jagler is frustrated Milwaukee Public Schools seems to be ignoring the state law that requires police officers in the city’s schools. But, he doesn’t expect any changes either.

Jagler, R-Watertown, last week wrote a letter to the MPS board, asking when the city’s schools plan to follow the law and return school resource officers to their buildings.

Republican lawmakers included the school resource officer in 2023’s shared revenue deal. It required MPS to add 25 officers by Jan. 1. That didn’t happen.

“Now, I know it didn't get done fast enough last year. And to be honest, I kind of, to be fair, just kind of assumed it would be done in August of this year,” Jagler said on News Talk 1130 WISN on Tuesday.

Jagler said he realized that Milwaukee Public Schools may never return the officers to their buildings after hearing MPS school board vice president Jilly Gokalghandi dismiss a question about officers in schools during a question-and-answer session last month.

“We're going to continue to focus on restorative justice as the main lever of serving our kids,” Gokalghandi said. “So that is my commitment. I've said that. I've gone on record and said that over and over again. And so that is what I will focus on.”

Jagler said he was taken back by Gokalghandi’s dismissive attitude.

“Yeah, ‘chuckle, chuckle, chuckle, we're breaking state law, and we don't care.’ That just infuriated me. And not just the answer, which I guess I appreciate the honesty, but the just a flippant nature of it,” Jagler added.

There is no way for the legislature to force MPS to return school resource officers to its schools. The shared revenue law doesn’t include any punishments. Jageler said neither Gov. Tony Evers nor Wisconsin’s attorney general will “touch” the law to enforce it.

But, Jagler said, MPS may be creating a bigger problem by thumbing their nose at the law.

“What it's going to do, going forward, as we look at anything with MPS, [maybe a] bailout with new funding, how can we trust them to do anything?” Jagler asked.

Jagler said MPS responded to his letter with a promise to have an update on its school resource officer program at this week’s school board meeting. But he said the district isn’t promising to actually return officers to school anytime soon.

“‘We have been in discussions with stakeholders, including the teachers union, and the police department the goal to develop a plan in partnership with MPD which redefines the previous role of school resource officers,” Jagler read from MPS’ response to his letter.