Monday, April 29, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Monday, April 29, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

I Am Mama Bear, Hear Me Roar: Reclaiming Feminism to Protect Women and Girls [WRN VOICES]

spot_img

There will be a public hearing today at the capitol in Madison, Wisconsin on Assembly Bill 377 and Assembly Bill 378 Protect Women’s Sports. These bills would protect girls’ athletic opportunities, physical safety, and emotional well-being by ensuring that only biological females can compete in all-female sports competitions both in K-12 public schools.

“Whatever happened to I am woman, hear me roar?!” Asked an exasperated Representative Lisa McClain, chair of the House Oversight Committee Hearing on Protecting Female Athletics and Title IX. She, like many of us, is mad as hell that the definition of ‘sex’ under Title IX will soon include ‘gender identity,’ thereby eliminating female-only athletics in schools and universities and rewinding decades of progress in women’s rights.

Former NCAA Division I swimmer Riley Gaines also wants to know where the ‘feminists’ are ready to stand with female athletes and protect women’s sports. “I think it’s extremely ironic that the people advocating for this are the same party, the same people who were once advocating for women’s empowerment,” Gaines said to a crowd of over 200 at the “Courage Unleashed” event held in Milwaukee this Fall. “Where are the people who once believed that women, real women in all of their uniqueness, could conquer the world and deserve respect and equal opportunities?”

Gaines, a 12-time All-American and three-time Southeastern Conference champion, became a national hero when she made the courageous decision to publicly criticize the National Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA) ‘Gender Inclusion’ guidelines, which allowed for a biological male, Lia Thomas, to compete in all-female competitive athletics after just one year of hormone replacement therapy.

Because the NCAA doesn’t have the stones to do the right thing, “Thomas’ rank skyrocketed from 65th for men to 1st in the female 500-yard freestyle, and from 554th for men to 5th for women in the 200-yard freestyle.” Women’s sports are not a consolation category where mediocre male competitors – with the advantage of going through male puberty – can identify as a female, transition to the women’s category, and crush the competition. But that’s exactly what is happening, and it’s simply not fair.

Though deeply divided, I am old enough to remember a time when women on the political left and right could all agree that a crowning achievement of ‘feminism’ was Title IX, which ensured women and girls had the same educational opportunities and a level playing field in athletic sports.

To the surprise of many, including the infamous “Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling, so-called feminists are now more committed to woke identity politics than they are to the protection and safety of women and girls. As it turns out, the rise of false compassion for men identifying as transgender is a means to the end of censorship and control.

Woke ‘feminists’ would prefer a middle school in Vermont ban an entire group of embarrassed female students from the girls’ locker room than hurt the feelings of a boy who identifies as a girl.

Title IX is About Biological Sex, Not Gender Identity

The progressive playbook requires activists to make identity, even self-declared identities, the responsibility of the law. We must steadfastly reject this if we are to maintain civilizational sanity. We cannot pretend differences between men and women don’t exist, and there exists no fairy dust with which to simply wish biological sex away. Title IX deals with biological reality, not gender fluidity.

Title IX ensures that no one is denied equal access to educational opportunities based on sex. It played a significant role in ensuring girls can fairly compete in sports. Before the creation of Title IX, even the most talented female athletes wouldn’t have the same opportunities given to male athletes at school or university. Their teams might lack funding, be relegated to a recreation-only team, or sometimes not even have a competitive team on which to play.

With the dawn of Title IX, women could finally compete on a level playing field against other women, with similar opportunities as their male counterparts. Under the law, biological males are ineligible to compete on all female athletic teams, even those who identify as transgender “girls.”

In her testimony before the Committee on Education, Sarah Perry, the Senior Legal Fellow for the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation said,” While Title IX does not define “sex,” the term as used in that law was in the biological sense because its very purpose was to promote equality between the sexes.”

According to Perry, “Principles of fundamental fairness and equal opportunity must prevail over arguments for the ‘inclusion’ of males as females. They must if girls’ sports are to continue to exist at all.” Sports are competitive, and fair competition requires a level playing field. There are divisions, age brackets, and weight classes for a reason. College sports are for college athletes—professional sports are for pro athletes, and female sports should be for female athletes.

The Weaponizing of Title IX to Co-Opt and Invade Women’s Spaces

The Biden administration is poised to change the definition of sex in Title IX to include gender identity as a protected class and thus bring the 50-year-old law in line with the cultural zeitgeist of our day: Gender Ideology. The transgender craze isn’t lost on Democrats in Wisconsin either; they enthusiastically support gutting Title IX, even as Wisconsinites are still reeling from a recent locker room incident (that continues to make national news) in which an 18-year-old biological male in Sun Prairie showered naked next to four horrified freshman girls, exposing his male genitalia, telling them, “I’m trans, by the way.”

Engineers and architects cannot dismiss gravity or other measurable realities of a material world; legislators charged with crafting our laws cannot dismiss the measurable realities of biological sex. Denial of objective truth in favor of a lie, however noble and well-intentioned that lie may be, will create an unfair and potentially dangerous playing field for Wisconsin females engaged in sports. It already has.

When parents complained about their daughters’ unusual number of bruises, welts, and injuries, as well as fears of changing in the locker room with a biological male, the WIAA (Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association), the superintendent, and the board refused to intervene. Like the NCAA, the WIAA operates as if Biden’s reimagined definition of “sex” under Title IX is already in effect, as do most school districts.

A year of hormone suppression accompanied by a self-declaration like “I’m Trans, by the way,” and abracadabra; a biological male can compete as a woman or girl, enter their private spaces, and rob females of accolades, opportunities, and sense of well-being.

The WIAA is not alone. In North Carolina, a transgender athlete on an all-female team spiked the ball, hitting an opposing player in the face, causing a concussion and neck injury severe enough to end her athletic career.

A 17-year-old female athlete in California suffered a similar injury after a trans-identifying opponent spiked a ball into her face. In November, a Massachusetts female high school field hockey player literally got her teeth knocked out by a male player. “The shrieks and screams of fear and pain that projected from her after being hit filled the stadium,” according to a teammate.

Shockingly, the left’s ability to warp language and redefine ‘sex’ to include men who self-identify as women has real-world consequences- males now enjoy a competitive advantage that enables them to physically dominate their female counterparts.

Follow the Science

The science is clear: one year of testosterone suppression therapy does not meaningfully change the faster muscle twitch response, greater bone density, greater muscle mass, and higher lung capacity that biological boys possess when compared to girls. Such biological distinctions, which give biological males a decided, if not overwhelming, advantage over females in athletic competition, cannot be suppressed. These advantages in contact sports will lead to physical harm. We cannot pretend biological reality away just because that truth conflicts with the political ideology of a zealous few.

A systematic review of 24 studies concluded that while trans-identifying males do experience a decrease in muscle mass, values for strength and muscle area in transwomen remain above those of biological women, even after 36 months of hormone therapy.

Girlhood and womanhood cannot be achieved with estrogen injections. Longer hair, lipstick, and wearing a sports bra do not define womanhood. No matter how distressed a young person feels, caring adults must tell them the truth and AFFIRM REALITY.

We cannot play make-believe and pretend males do not have a biological advantage over females regarding a higher cardiovascular capacity, greater bone density, and significantly more muscle mass. Sex is an immutable, biological, chromosomal reality that endocrinologists, pharmaceutical companies, or a wish upon a star cannot overcome.

They are Gaslighting Us

Objective people think that girls should not have to compete against boys in sports, nor should they have to use the same bathroom. Reasonable and concerned parents know that males and females should not be taking showers naked together in a high school locker room after gym class or a game. That’s a recipe for utter disaster.

All elected representatives should stand with parents committed to upholding girls’ and women’s rights. We are the feminists Now. Leftist radicals who tell us to ignore our lying eyes are experts at weaponizing compassion. Please don’t allow yourself or your community to fall prey to their gaslighting.

In a time when a majority of Americans can’t come to a consensus on anything, several recent polls show a walloping 70% of U.S. adults agree that transgender athletes should not be allowed to compete on sports teams that do not correspond with their biological sex; translation: Biological males should not invade all-female athletics in K-12 schools or at the collegiate level.

Democrats on the ‘transgender or bust’ bandwagon know their radical ideology is deeply unpopular, so they resort to emotional blackmail and scare tactics to extract the natural, self-preserving instincts from women and girls…and shame on them for doing it.

On December 5th, 2023, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez testified that the ability of transgender-identifying males to play on all-female teams results in higher female participation. The implication is that girls can’t wait to shower in locker rooms next to biological men with fully intact genitalia. They are thrilled with the prospect of being dominated by men (pretending to be women) in a sport that they have spent their whole lives trying to master.

This is the most offensive gaslighting on the issue of women’s sports I’ve seen yet. Don’t believe the woke narrative. In fact, girls are dropping out of sports at unprecedented rates, which is what happens when ideologues erase women out of women’s sports. Pubescent girls already had higher drop-out rates in athletics compared to boys. Add the AOC transgender cheerleading squad to the mix, and the result is demoralization and avoidance.

Female competitors don’t want to contend with or against dudes in “all-female” athletic categories, and they don’t want to shower with them either. Females don’t play sports to provide a sense of belonging for biological boys, who feel really sad. Women and girls don’t play sports to make friends and braid each other’s hair; they want to compete. They want to win, but not with the deck stacked against them.

Truth Matters

In the end, this issue is about so much more than sports. According to Sarah Perry, Senior Legal Counsel for the Heritage Foundation, a sex binary—male and female—the understanding that there are only two sexes and that the opportunities for both must be equal under the law is the foundation upon which sex discrimination protections exist. “The entire canon of American civil rights law endures to protect the interests of all Americans, not elevate certain Americans to superior, privileged positions over others.

To allow space for female sports to open the door to biological males identifying as transgender women promotes a few, only to destroy the educational and athletic opportunities of the many. All but guaranteeing unfair outcomes for females. The inclusion of men means the exclusion of women. Celebrating trans males leads to denigrating biological females.”

Defending the Indefensible: False Compassion is Currency

Why are women willing to jump on the transgender rights bandwagon? Currency. Modern feminists on the left compete to see who can be the quickest to give women’s rights away and have the currency, or false status claim, of appearing ‘nice.’ This is the very definition of woke ‘virtue signaling.’ Woke women use’ kindness’ to score a political win against traditional, sane women.

According to Jordan Peterson, studies show that anti-social behavior among women often devolves into malicious slander and reputation destruction. Peterson also suggests that the maternal instinct leftist radicals are so desperate to suppress only transferred from caregiving for infants and children to mothering the “oppressed,” and at this moment, the oppressed include anyone who identifies as transgender and non-binary.

Now we can see why drag queens, men who are traditionally classified as autogynephiles (males sexually aroused by the idea of being a woman), are being welcomed into family-friendly events by predominately progressive females. The woke mind virus is so strong that radicalized mothers are suppressing their natural instinct to protect their own children and instead prioritize the feelings of the oppressed. Sacrificing their child’s well-being for the greater good is the ultimate sacrifice and renders a significant amount of currency.

This Faustian Bargain must be exposed, disrupted, and firmly rejected by sane Americans. Parents should never be required to create a space of ‘welcoming and belonging’ for those who would potentially cause their child, or any child, harm.

Have ‘We The People’ Lost Our Minds? No, we haven’t. Biden’s Title IX revisions, allowing men to play pretend in women’s and girls’ athletics, will radically undermine female sports and lead to the erasure of women and girls. We can’t let that happen. In such a time as this, we must protect our children from woke identity schemes. I know I will not stop fighting to protect the systematic elimination of my daughter’s rights, and there is an army of moms and dads behind me. I am Mama Bear, hear me roar.

You Can Help Protect Women’s Sports Right Now

“So-called feminists have abandoned us.” This sentiment of too many young women indicates that our support is needed now more than ever. Twenty-three states realize that PROACTIVE measures are necessary in order to prevent biological girls from being injured. They passed legislation that prohibits biological boys from playing on female athletic teams and protects the private changing areas of women and girls. We should not wait for more Wisconsin females to incur injury and/or have their safe space violated then act REACTIVELY with legislation.

Assembly Bill 377 and Assembly Bill 378 Protect Women’s Sports bills would protect girls’ athletic opportunities, physical safety, and emotional well-being by ensuring that only biological females can compete in all-female sports competitions both in K-12 public schools (and private schools that participate in the Parental Choice Program) as well as at the collegiate level. Please call and email your State Senators and Governor Evers and tell them to support AB 377 AND AB 378, as they are commonsense bills ensuring the fairness and safety of Wisconsin females participating in school athletics.

Public Hearing TODAY At the capitol in Madison, Wisconsin. Written testimony in support of these bills can be sent to the offices of Representative Dittrich and Senator Dan Knodl.

sen tammy baldwin

Sen. Tammy Baldwin Slips ‘Through the Back Door’ During UW-Green Bay Student Protest: Report

U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, under growing fire from the left, slipped out of a room...
solar energy

Destroying Your Ability to Finance Solar [Up Against the Wall]

The PSC is now considering the issue of net metering, which is when electric utilities...
trump vs biden

Trump Leads Biden by SIX PERCENT in New CNN Poll, Pulls Ahead With Women

Trump vs. Biden: The widening lead comes as Democrats are trying to jail the Republican...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Redistricting Hearing Wisconsin should soon have an answer about ballot drop boxes and just who can return absentee ballots. wisconsin supreme court

Wisconsin Pro-life Groups Tell Supreme Court There’s No Right to Abortion

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s pro-life groups are unified in telling the Wisconsin Supreme Court it is not the court’s job to create a right to abortion.

Wisconsin Right to Life, Wisconsin Family Action and Pro-Life Wisconsin all filed a joint brief with the court that argues there is no right to abortion and add that if there is to be one, that decision is up to lawmakers.

“The Supreme Court is not the proper venue to create health and safety law nor the proper mechanism to add a constitutional amendment. The legislature is the proper body to weigh the policy considerations and create law, not the court,” Wisconsin Family Action president Christine File said.

“Finding a right to abortion in our state constitution, where there clearly is none, would be the most extreme form of legislating from the bench,” Dan Miller, state director at Pro-Life Wisconsin, said. “The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled in Dobbs that there is no federal constitutional right to abortion. Nothing in Wisconsin’s constitution or the history of our state would remotely suggest such a right. We implore the Wisconsin Supreme Court to reject Planned Parenthood’s radical and self-serving plans.”

Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin in February asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide if there is a right to abortion in the state.

The Supreme Court has accepted the case, and the filing from Wisconsin’s pro-life groups is in response to that case.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty also filed a brief in the case.

“There is no right to an abortion in Wisconsin’s Constitution. No judge, justice, or lawyer should be creating policy for Wisconsinites out of thin air. Reversing Roe v. Wade through the Dobbs decision rightfully placed the abortion issue back where it should have been all along – in the halls of state legislatures,” WILL Deputy Counsel Luke Berg said. “That’s where the debate and conversation must remain.”

The court is expecting responses from everyone involved in the case by today. The court has not said when it expects to hear oral arguments.

trump waukesha

President Trump Will Hold Rally in Waukesha on May 1; How to Get Tickets

President Donald J. Trump will travel to Waukesha, Wisconsin, on May 1 "to contrast the...
barry braatz

Washington County DA Candidate Barry Braatz Promises to ‘Hold Criminals Accountable,’ Gets Big Endorsement

"I will work side-by-side with law enforcement to hold criminals accountable" - Barry Braatz. Barry Braatz,...
Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...