Thursday, April 25, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Thursday, April 25, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Murder Victim’s Family Tells Evers’ Chief of Staff: ‘He Has to Make the Right Decision’ [VIDEO]

spot_img

“I do have concerns, absolutely. I am incredibly concerned,” – Gov. Tony Evers’ chief of staff Maggie Gau, referring to an Evers’ appointee’s decision to parole wife-killer Douglas Balsewicz. Evers, however, has yet to condemn the early release, which is scheduled for May 17.

The family of murder victim Johanna Balsewicz told Gov. Tony Evers’ chief of staff Maggie Gau in an emotional closed-door meeting on Thursday that they want the governor to remove the Parole Commission chairman he appointed and work to get the release of a convicted wife killer overturned.

They left with a promise that the governor, whom they had tried repeatedly to contact to no avail, would meet with them. That meeting is now scheduled for 10 a.m. on Friday, May 13, 2022.

See our exclusive video of Gau meeting with the family throughout this story.

“He (Evers) has to make the right decision,” said the victim’s brother Michael Binder to Gau. “Gov. Evers, who picked this guy, if I have to get on my hands and knees and beg the hell out him, this (stopping the release) is what needs to happen. You made a bad decision, you weren’t anticipating the family would kick all this dirt.”

Binder noted, “I know the governor candidates are all talking about this. This could be the undoing of Gov. Evers” if he doesn’t fire Tate.

“The way things are going and have exploded, this could be his undoing.”

Johanna’s sister Kim Binder Cornils told Gau of Evers’ appointee Parole Commission Chairman John Tate, who authorized the release: “This is to our bones. This is what I have left of my sister, the hair that I picked out of her carpet, the bloody hair (she showed Gau a locket)….This (Tate) is somebody Tony Evers wanted to put in there. This is a slap in the face from Tony Evers. He has the power, and he better do something because we are not going away.”

The family also wants Evers to suspend all paroles through the end of the year, including that of Douglas Balsewicz.

Cornils told Gau, “Evers has a hand in this. He can get rid of Tate. That’s his power. He needs to get rid of Tate, and he needs to stop all paroles from now until next year and that includes Doug Balsewicz, and I think what Evers and Tate need to do is read the transcripts” from the case.

At another point, she said, “Gov. Evers has the power to get Tate out of office and get this overturned…we are not going to stand for, ‘well, there’s nothing we can do.’ You put him in the office.”

Wisconsin Right Now was the only news outlet allowed in the meeting at Evers’ Capitol office. Gau tried to close the meeting to all press, but the family insisted that they wanted WRN to stay to document what was said. Later in the day, Evers refused to talk to Channels 4 and 12 about the parole, when they caught up with him at a Milwaukee-area event.

Evers is also trying to ban the media from the Friday meeting, the family told WRN.

WTMJ4News “tried to ask Gov. Evers about it (the parole) while he was at an event in Menomonee Falls, but he said he had to get going,” the television station wrote on Thursday night.

Evers walked away from a Channel 12 reporter who asked him about the parole.

On Thursday, Gau told the family Evers was not in Madison because of a morning event in Marinette and an afternoon event in the Milwaukee area. The powerful chief of staff met with the family instead; they told her they had repeatedly contacted the governor’s office and the Parole Commission to no avail. Previously, someone from the governor’s office even told them Evers would call them, but he never did, they said. They also say they found out he was being released through the grapevine. The office of victim’s rights with the Department of Corrections did not call them to let them know Balsewicz was being released until it was widely reported in the news media, the family says.

Maggie gau

Gau apologized to the family for the problems they outlined with the notifications and promised that they would be able to meet with the governor face-to-face. “I am not a liar, you have my word on this, and we will make this happen,” she told the family after a half-hour of heartfelt and heartbreaking accounts from family members about how Johanna’s murder and Balsewicz’s looming parole have devastated them.

Asked whether Evers would condemn the release, Gau would not say. Wisconsin Right Now was allowed to ask a question with the family’s permission. It was, “Why hasn’t Gov. Evers condemned this in the strongest of terms and why hasn’t he called on John Tate to reverse this?”

Gau responded by telling the family, “It’s really important for him to hear from you all, to hear from you directly. I have this document as well.” She did not answer the questions. The document referred to court records the family brought along.

So far, the governor’s only statement on the matter has been to claim he doesn’t have the power to overturn Tate’s decision. However, he does have the power to remove Tate, whom he appointed, and who serves at his pleasure. He also has the power to use his bully pulpit to condemn the release, which he has not done. For his part, Tate, who is also a Racine alderman, told the Racine Journal-Times that he won’t reverse his decision to release Balsewicz on May 17 because he’s afraid Balsewicz would sue. The family has tried repeatedly to speak with him to no avail, even traveling to the Parole Commission offices after their meeting with Gau. Tate’s cell phone has a voice message saying he won’t return calls relating to parole.

Maggie gau

Gau also declined the family’s request that she stand at their side before television cameras.

Theresa Cook, Johanna’s niece, told Gau, “It’s just not okay, and we’re not going to stop.”

Michael Binder, Johanna’s brother, put the emphasis back on the victim.

“All we are hearing about was the act…I want people to understand who Johanna Rose was,” he said. “Johanna Rose was a spunky little girl with a free spirit. She met this guy at a young age against my parents’ wishes… and she was adamant that he was her knight in shining armor.. she was trying to live the American dream; they bought a house, they had two beautiful children, she had presence of mind to go to Concordia University to get a degree as a medical assistant. And this guy because of his selfishness, his ignorance, because of the fact he couldn’t deal with being a father, and she gave him ultimatums, on his birthday he decides to break into her house and stab her 42 times.”

He continued, “I will never forget my father calling and asking me if I could go to the medical examiner’s office to identify her body. I thought by doing plea bargain this clown would be sitting there and would maybe pull 40 years when he would be 77 years, I might have been able to live with that, but he’s 54 and probably has 20 years ahead of him.”

Binder, a military veteran, concluded, “Right now I don’t have trust in our system; I don’t have trust in the parole board.”

Karen Kannenberg, another of Johanna’s sisters, told Gau: “Can you imagine these two little kids with their mom dying a slow death, from midnight until 8 in the morning…they were in this bed just clinging with fear, no one can even imagine what they went through all this time. This man stabs her, kills her and he leaves knowing his two kids are there as well.” One of the two toddlers, Christopher, then 4, later died in a car accident.

Cook called the pending release a “gross injustice.”

“I understand,” said Gau.

Michael Binder told Gau he served in the military for 30 years and retired as a command sergeant major. He said he had fired people who showed bad judgment or made major errors. “I’m smart enough and savvy enough to know this thing can be turned around and the right decision can be made,” he said.

As for the notion that Balsewicz might sue, Binder said, “So be it because no one can put a price tag on a loved one’s life.”

Gau told the family she was “so incredibly sorry on the notification piece in particular. That is not ok. That is not the system we have. You can mark my words, we are absolutely going to go back to have a conversation about that. I’m going to find out what the hell happened here.”

She told the family that parole is not like pardons, where the governor reviews testimony and is involved in the review and approval process.

“That is a decision made by John. We do not have an approval, the governor is not involved,” said Gau.

“Who is John’s superior?” Cook asked.

Gau said the Parole Commission is located within the Department of Corrections, but Cook asked, “Who is his boss?” Gau said, “John runs the commission.”

Cook responded, “We want to get to the meat of this. He (Tate) is not infallible, and he deserves to be disciplined for this.”

Gau said the family “have a commitment from us” that Evers would meet with them.

Cook asked why Evers’ office “never contacted us before.”

Gau said that in some situations families did not want contact, but Cook said the family had made it clear they did “in every message.”

Gau said that it wasn’t “passed on to me that there was a request for a meeting” but said she rearranged her schedule to meet with the family and would be “absolutely” having a conversation with the governor and work on getting a meeting set up between Evers and the family.

Cook told Gau, “I voted for Evers. I was a union member for MTEA, which is very close to his heart. It’s almost personal for how hard I knocked doors and worked for him.”

The family noted that the 25th anniversary of Johanna’s death is coming up.

Maggie gau

Cook said the family is “sickened” by past statements Tate made in the press about not wanting victims’ families to show pictures of victims in their coffins at parole hearings.

The family expressed that they have suffered great trauma that reignited after the news of the parole broke.

Gau said, “I am sorry for the trauma you all had to endure; from the bottom of my heart, I am truly, truly sorry.”
Cook touched her own chest and said, “This heart is not mended and this right here is just pouring acid on it….please hear our cry.”

“Can Tate reverse this?” asked Binder.

Gau stammered, “I’m not sure; I’m, I’m, I’m – I need to look.” [Experts have told Wisconsin Right Now that Tate could reverse himself by citing additional input or new concerns about the offender’s ability to reintegrate into the community, for example.]

Cornils said, “Tate is more for the criminal. He believes after 20 years of knifing, stabbing, gashing that they’re going to be good for society if they’re let out. They made a mistake.”

Cook told Gau she also did not have confidence in the decision-making of Jennifer Kramer, the parole commissioner who recommended Balsewicz’s release to Tate, who had the final say.

They described Balsewicz as controlling, jealous, and a drug user. “He would call her 50 times a day,” said Kannenberg. They also say he made up that she was dancing with black men, something the criminal complaint said angered him, giving him a racist motive.

Cornils said Johanna told her that Balsewicz told her, “If I can’t have you nobody will” and she told her sister, “he’s going to kill me.”

“If I have to go to Fox Lake and stand out there with JoJo’s picture, I will. I called Biden’s office. We’re not playing around,” said Cook.

Cook noted, “We have been calling this week non-stop; all of us called this office, the parole commission, John Tate, Victims’ rights of DOC, and I’ve actually talked to someone from this office three or four times… I voted for Evers. I worked for MPS for 15 years, and I am very disappointed and feel let down. This is not what I voted for him for. It is insensitive and disrespectful.”

trump waukesha

President Trump Will Hold Rally in Waukesha on May 1; How to Get Tickets

President Donald J. Trump will travel to Waukesha, Wisconsin, on May 1 "to contrast the...
barry braatz

Washington County DA Candidate Barry Braatz Promises to ‘Hold Criminals Accountable,’ Gets Big Endorsement

"I will work side-by-side with law enforcement to hold criminals accountable" - Barry Braatz. Barry Braatz,...
Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...

Rep. Janel Brandtjen: Threats to WEC Chief Don’t Help

(The Center Square) – One of the biggest critics of Wisconsin’s election administrator says no one should be threatening her and says threats don’t help fix election integrity issues.

State Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, on Tuesday offered her thoughts after the Wisconsin Elections Commission confirmed elections administrator Meagan Wolfe is receiving extra security protection.

"Threatening Administrator Meagan Wolfe, or any election official, is unacceptable and counterproductive. Venting frustrations on individuals like Wolfe, clerks, or poll workers is not only illegal but also harmful to rebuilding trust in our elections,” Brandtjen said. “Threats only undermine our republic and empower the courts and media. It's essential to address any concerns about election processes through legal channels. Threats have no place in our democracy.”

Brandtjen has been one of Wisconsin’s loudest critics of Wolfe. She led hearings as far back as 2021 into Wolfe’s role in the 2020 election. Brandtjen also led the push to get Wolfe removed from the Elections Commission.

“Wolfe’s term has indeed expired, and according to Wisconsin Statutes 15.61(1)(b)1, she should be removed, but Republicans are too worried about the press or too compromised to follow existing law.” Brandtjen said.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Monday clarified that Wolfe is receiving extra security but refused to offer any details.

“The Wisconsin Elections Commission has had productive conversations about safety and security with state leadership, including the governor’s office, which is tasked with approving security measures for state government officials,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind said in a statement. “Those conversations have resulted in additional security measures being approved for Administrator Wolfe and the WEC when the need arises.”

Brandtjen on Tuesday blamed Wisconsin Republicans, and once again blamed Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, for Wolfe’s continued time on the Elections Commission.

“It's disappointing that Sen. Dan Knodl and Rep. Scott Krug, chairs of the election committees, have not exercised their investigative and subpoena powers. This inaction has allowed the neglect of essential laws, such as providing ballots to individuals declared incompetent, lack of checks in military ballot requests, an insecure online system, and improper guidance on voting for homeless individuals without proper documentation,” she said. “The Legislature, particularly Speaker Vos' control, is responsible for the frustration caused by election irregularities due to their inaction.”

Wisconsin’s local election managers have reported an uptick in threats and angry rhetoric since the 2020 election, and some local election offices have taken extra precautions. But there haven’t been any cases in Wisconsin where someone has acted on an election threat.

Wisconsin’s Largest Business Group Sues Over Evers’ 400-year School Funding Veto

(The Center Square) – There is now a legal challenge to Gov. Tony Evers’ 400-year school funding veto.

The WMC Litigation Center on Monday asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take up their challenge to the governor’s summer veto that increased per-pupil funding for the next four centuries.

“At issue is Gov. Evers’ use of the so-called ‘Vanna White’ or ‘pick-a-letter’ veto,” the group said in a statement. “The governor creatively eliminated specific numbers in a portion of the budget bill that was meant to increase the property tax levy limit for school districts in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 fiscal years. By striking individual digits, the levy limit would instead be increased from the years 2023 to 2425 – or four centuries into the future.”

The WMC Litigation Center is an affiliate of Wisconsin Manufactures & Commerce (WMC), the combined state chamber and manufacturers’ association.

Litigation Center Executive Director Scott Rosenow said while Wisconsin’s governor has an incredibly powerful veto pen, there are limits.

“No Wisconsin governor has the authority to strike individual letters or digits to form a new word or number, except when reducing appropriations,” Rosenow said. “This action is not only unconstitutional on its face, but it is undemocratic because this specific partial veto allows school districts to raise property taxes for the next 400 years without voter approval.”

Wisconsin lawmakers and voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1990 that put limits on the governor’s veto power.

Rosenow and the WMC Litigation Center say the governor’s veto goes beyond those limits.

The legal challenge also raises the constitutional issue that all state spending has to originate with, and be approved by, the legislature.

“In no uncertain terms, 402 years is not less than or part of the two-year duration approved by the Legislature – it is far more,” concluded Rosenow. “The governor overstepped his authority with this partial veto, at the expense of taxpayers, and we believe oversight by the Court is necessary.”

The WMC Litigation Center is asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case as quickly as possible.

Let’s Thank Rep. August, Sen. Wimberger, & WI Voters For Ending Zuckerbucks

Remember when Elon Musk challenged Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match? That fight between Twitter/Threads billionaires...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

‘Scam Trial’: Trump Slams Judge, Says He May Not Let Him Go to Son’s Graduation, Campaign

"This is about election interference; that’s all it’s about" - former President Donald Trump. Former President...