Milwaukee Public Museum’s Fuzzy Math: Are Officials Misleading Taxpayers About ‘Deferred Maintenance’? [EXCLUSIVE]

spot_img

Wisconsin Right Now, with a project-specific grant from No Better Friend Corp., Kevin Nicholson’s non-profit organization, is investigating the Milwaukee County Museum’s rhetoric, cost estimates and plans for a new museum. Read the entire series here. 

Is the museum misleading the public about deferred maintenance costs to justify a new $240 million building project?

We took a deep dive into the “deferred maintenance” numbers the Milwaukee Public Museum is using to justify its claim that building a new $240 million facility is the only option. We found a troubling lack of transparency, and numbers that have constantly shifted.

We also found that, if the museum simply fixed its maintenance needs, staying in the current building would be cheaper to county taxpayers than building a new museum, even though the museum’s CEO and the county executive have claimed the opposite.

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceTo put it simply, the museum has used ballooning numbers for deferred maintenance – their estimate increased from $30 million in 2015 to $100 million on its website today – to drive a narrative in Milwaukee’s indifferent media that backlogged maintenance costs make staying in the current facility unfeasible.

However, we’ve been able to document using public records that the museum’s so-called “deferred” maintenance costs appear to actually extend 20 years into the future; in other words, it’s the equivalent of you saying something like, “well, 18 years down the road, I’ll probably need a new roof, so I better tear down my entire current house and build a smaller one right now even though it will cost more. Even though I could just choose to budget responsibly instead, set money aside, and be fine when the repair comes.”

This all raises the legitimate question of why the county doesn’t just pay for the maintenance annually and stay in the current building, perhaps building off-site storage to better protect the collections. Off-site storage will be needed in the new building anyway, which is half the size. Building an off-site storage warehouse is estimated to only cost $2.3 million.

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceWisconsin Right Now put the shifting estimates for deferred maintenance in a timeline based on county documents and news articles. You can see it at the end of this story. The timeline  shows how Milwaukee’s media outlets have functioned as stenographers for museum officials, reporting shifting amounts without pressing museum and county leaders on how the estimates were reached, what they really mean, or why they were constantly changing.

The Museum’s Estimate Jumped $50 Million in Less Than a Year

What museum officials are telling the public now on their website  – a claim parroted in a January 2023 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel story – is not what they told the county less than a year ago. In less than one year’s time, the museum’s deferred maintenance estimate jumped by $50 million without detailed explanation.

Museum officials have refused to explain their deferred maintenance numbers to Wisconsin Right Now, and museum CEO Ellen Censky has refused to sit down for an interview. That’s despite pledging transparency and $85 million in public funding from the state and county.

This is a pattern. They’ve also refused to explain which exhibits will be featured in the new museum, including being specific about what will happen to the popular Streets of Old Milwaukee exhibit, although they do promise to have a “green roof” and “bird friendly glass.” Groundbreaking is scheduled for December 2023 on the new $240 million project.

Today, the museum claims on its website that it “has approximately $100 million deferred capital maintenance” as justification for needing the new $240 million museum project, funded in part by taxpayers. “Milwaukee County, despite its best efforts, simply does not have funds available to maintain the building,” they tell taxpayers.

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceWhy this matters: The museum claims it would cost $250 million to stay in the old building, in part due to deferred maintenance; conveniently, the figure is $10 million more than building a new facility, strengthening officials’ public argument for a new museum.

We did what other media have not. We have tried to pin down exactly how the museum is reaching that $250 million estimate, which ballooned from $131 million in a 2015 consultants’ report. A key part of it is the deferred maintenance claim.

Just three years ago, Censky told BizTimes that the museum didn’t even have $100 million in deferred maintenance costs projected “over the next 20 years.”

On the website, taxpayers are not told about the 20-year context.

“In all, the museum faces an estimated $87 million in deferred maintenance projected over the next 20 years,” the BizTimes reported that Censky told them in 2019.

In addition, We’ve previously revealed that top museum officials admit that $80-90 million of the $250 million cost for renovating the old museum comes from what they believe is a pressing need to update exhibits for racial and equity concerns, although, yet again, they won’t say which ones or why it’s needed.


Tracing the Museum’s ‘Fuzzy Math’

Tracing the museum’s deferred maintenance numbers is not easy since they won’t cooperate.

Through public records, we unearthed a document for the $87 million number that comes close to the $100 million deferred maintenance claim on the museum’s website if you take a lot of liberties in rounding it up. This is the estimate that is spread over the next 20 years.

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceIn February 2019, an appraisal report sent to Milwaukee County’s Department of Administrative Services by The Nicholson Group Inc. found that the “building and its mechanical systems are in deferred condition with a Facility Condition Assessment Report estimating $86.45 million for necessary replacements and capital needs over the next 20 years.” Read it here.

However, in a March 2022 meeting before a county committee that approved $45 million in public funding for the new project, Katie Sanders, the chief planning officer for the museum, told supervisors that a 2015 study put the museum’s deferred maintenance at $30 million and underestimated it by “at least $20 million.”

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenance
Katie sanders meeting slide in march 2022

That would bring her estimate for deferred maintenance to at least $50 million. She used the estimate to help convince supervisors to approve the funding.

In late 2021, a Milwaukee interoffice communication written by Aaron Hertzberg, Director, Department of Administrative Services, and Dr. Ellen Censky, President & CEO, Milwaukee Public Museum, to Marcelia Nicholson, Chairwoman, Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors, also suddenly used the more than $50 million figure.

“Overall high-level estimated deferred capital costs associated with the current building are in excess of $50,000,000,” it says.

It notes that a 2015 Gallagher and Associates report “underestimated the deferred maintenance of the building (at the time noting only $30,000,000) and did not account for the full cost of storage equipment.” The report then states that the Gallagher report only discussed updating two exhibits, which the memo says means the “concept of remaining in the building fails to achieve racial equity outcomes.” The document does not list the specific deferred maintenance needs.

It’s unclear why the museum is currently telling the public the deferred maintenance number has jumped to more than $100 million.

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceUsing Sanders’ number and the number in the memo, that would make the annual cost about $2.5 million a year over 20 years to clear up the deferred maintenance projects in the old building, although the amounts aren’t all spread evenly over each year. The county currently pays $3.5 million in operating costs to the museum each year. So that’s a grand total of $6 million per year to stay in the old museum, presuming the county couldn’t use some of the $3.5 million toward the deferred maintenance bills (or convince the county or state to use the public money they’ve already approved toward it).

We obtained a county document that shows the annual cost of moving to the new museum would cost the county $6.2 million a year – more than staying in the old facility. That figure counts the costs of maintaining the old building, which couldn’t simply be abandoned.

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenance

The state has already committed $40 million, and Milwaukee County has committed $45 million for a new building, ironically totaling almost the same amount as the Nicholson Group estimate – $85 million. [Note: The Nicholson Group is not tied to Kevin Nicholson.]

Could those funds instead be put towards the anticipated replacements and capital needs over the next 20 years, renovating the current building instead and saving beloved exhibits like the Streets of Old Milwaukee and the intricate artistic dioramas?

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceThe museum officials would likely argue that, in addition to deferred maintenance and racial/equity updates, renovating the old museum instead would accrue other costs. They’ve been vague about what however.

Concerns have been raised by an accreditation committee about the impact on collections from a supposedly deteriorating building.

However, as noted, a new off-site storage warehouse would only cost $2.3 million, according to Urban Milwaukee.

Sanders told a county committee it would also cost $20 million for moving the collections and storage equipment. In addition, in the $250 million cost for staying in the old building, she appears to have included the 2015 estimate of $131 million. That estimate included things some people might consider wants, like a new facade, and Vivarium (butterfly exhibit), a rooftop glass pavilion and patio, and a student lunchroom “connector.”

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceThe rest of the $240 million for the new museum is supposed to come from private donors. However, the new project has only raised $32 million from private donors – leaving it $118 million short with groundbreaking set for December, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (the museum has refused to give us the total amount of private donations raised so far). There has been no explanation of an alternative plan, should that figure not be met.

“The total cost of the project is $240 million—$90 million dollars in public funds ($45M from Milwaukee County, $40M from the State, $5M in other government funds); $150 million in private funding. We have raised more than half of the funds so far,” was all Madeline Anderson, the museum’s Earned Media director, would tell us.

Furthermore, the museum has received ongoing money for maintenance costs from the county over the years. In March 2022, Sanders told supervisors that the county had spent $15 million “in capital support in last 10 years” for the current building. That money would go down the drain with a move.

We asked the museum’s earned media director Madeline Anderson, and its public relations firm, Mueller Communications, to detail specifically what the deferred maintenance needs are. We sent a list of written questions, but most have gone unanswered. We have not received a detailed breakdown.

However, turning again toward public records, we unearthed the museum’s capital requests from 2019 through 2023. The total is only just over $21 million.

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenance

We found documents that break the maintenance needs down by year in county records. These documents show specifics for the $87 million in projected maintenance costs from 2018 to 2037; the figure is only $64 million from 2023 to 2037. That’s roughly close to Sanders’ estimate of “at least $50 million.”

The items are for capital improvements like stairs, roofs, HVAC, and electrical. Some years, very little money would be needed. In a couple years, large expenditures are budgeted.

See:

18-650 FUNDING NEEDS REPORT ALL REQUIREMENTS

18-650 FUNDING NEEDS REPORT BY SYSTEM

Milwaukee public museum deferred maintenanceWe wrote Milwaukee County Comptroller Scott Manske, asking him to detail the museum’s deferred maintenance needs from the county’s perspective. He didn’t respond, continuing the culture of non-transparency.


Shifting Deferred Maintenance Costs Timeline

2012

$30 million. The museum’s deferred maintenance needs were estimated by the museum’s chief financial officer at $30 million, according to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

2013

A county document says the county agreed to provide $4 million from 2014-2017 in capital project funding for deferred maintenance costs.

2015

$30 million.

Gallagher and Associates, the consulting firm hired by the museum to investigate the feasibility of staying in the current building, gave this number for its deferred maintenance needs. We have asked the museum for the full Gallagher report, but they have not provided it. We have also asked Gallagher whether they dispute the museum’s claims that they underestimated the museum’s true deferred maintenance needs in this report by $20 million, as stated by Sanders in March 2022. They have not responded.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that, in 2015, Milwaukee County “estimated that repairs and upgrades alone would cost $89 million in the coming 20 years.”

2018

$40 million.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that the current building had “about $40 million in deferred maintenance,” according to then museum President Dennis Kois.


2018

Nearly $100 million.

In 2019, a Strategic Plan 2018 – 2022 for the museum noted that “a study done in 2015 and then updated in 2018 reported nearly $100M in deferred maintenance on the Museum building.”

September 2018

$30 Million

A major report by the Wisconsin Policy Forum into Milwaukee cultural institutions noted, “Despite receiving nearly $10 million for repairs and updates in the past five years, the MPM building faces $30 million in deferred maintenance.”

2019

$30 million.

A 2019 feasibility study conducted by Gallagher and Associates on combining the museum with the Domes listed “repairs and maintenance” as $747,560 for the Milwaukee Public Museum for that year.

Urban Milwaukee reported that the museum had “approximately $30 million in deferred maintenance.”

In 2019, Ryan O’Desky, the museum’s chief operating officer and chief financial officer, told the county that the two largest issues “facing the museum are an aging air conditioning system and water leaks throughout the building.” He said that a chiller needed to be replaced that cools people in the summer as well as the museum’s collections. The cost was estimated at $850,000. The other issue cited was a fourth-floor roof with a price tag at $750,000.

April 2019

BizTimes reported that “the museum faces an estimated $87 million in deferred maintenance projected over the next 20 years,” according to museum CEO Censky.

February 2021

$30 million.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel notes in an article about state funding that the current museum was “in need of $30 million in deferred maintenance projects.”

March 2021

$30 million.

The Journal Sentinel repeats the $30 million deferred maintenance claim.

June 2021 – $40 million in state funding is approved

November 2021

More than $50 Million.

A Milwaukee interoffice communication written by Aaron Hertzberg, Director, Department of Administrative Services, and Dr. Ellen Censky, President & CEO, Milwaukee Public Museum, to Marcelia Nicholson, Chairwoman, Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors, suddenly uses the more than $50 million figure.

“Overall high-level estimated deferred capital costs associated with the current building are in excess of $50,000,000,” it says.

It notes that the Gallagher report “underestimated the deferred maintenance of the building (at the time noting only $30,000,000) and did not account for the full cost of storage equipment.” The report then states that the Gallagher report only discussed updating two exhibits, which the memo says means the “concept of remaining in the building fails to achieve racial equity outcomes.” The document does not list the specific deferred maintenance needs.

March 2022 – $45 million in county funding is approved

March 2022

More than $50 million.

WTMJ-TV reported that museum CEO “Censky says there is more than $50 million in deferred maintenance.”

Katie Sanders tells a county committee that the museum has at least $50 million in deferred maintenance.

March 2022

$70 million.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, in a story on the Milwaukee County Board approving $45 million in funding for the new museum, reports that the museum is “in need of $70 million in deferred maintenance projects.”

March 2022

WTMJ 620 AM reported “Since its construction in the 1960s, the museum has gained approximately $100 million in deferred capital maintenance.”

July 2022

$100 million.

BizTimes reported that the museum has $100 million in deferred maintenance.

January 2023

$100 million. The museum’s website currently claims that the museum “has approximately $100 million deferred capital maintenance.”

spot_img

Ted Oswald, Other Felons Are Seeking Commutations, Waukesha DA Says

Ted Oswald, who was convicted with his father in the execution of a Waukesha police captain, a hostage taking, bank robbery, shootout with police,...
Wisconsin Flat Tax Wisconsin's Social Security wisconsin charter schools

13.7% April Wisconsin Tax Collections Increase Led to Higher Revenue Estimate

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin collected $2.4 billion in general purpose revenue taxes in April, a 13.7% increase from the year before.

Those numbers matched the revenue estimates released before last week’s failure of a $1.8 billion surplus spending bill in the Wisconsin Senate.

The April numbers showed that state collections through April were up 5.2% year over year to nearly $17.4 billion in the fiscal year compared to $16.5 billion in collections in fiscal 2025.

That increase led to the Department of Administration’s new economic forecast showing that it expects the state to collect $300 to $350 million more in taxes from Wisconsin residents than its revised estimates in January showed.

More than half of that total, between $175 and $185 million, will come from individual income tax collection increases while $70 to $80 million will come from corporate tax collections.

“While a portion of the gain in individual income tax collections results from a favorable comparison due to processing season anomalies in fiscal year 2024-25, growth has significantly exceeded the 1.4 percent growth rate estimated in January for fiscal year 2025-26,” the Department of Administration wrote in a memo.

Part of the processing season anomalies were noted in the April revenue report for the state.

“Individual income taxes and Total GPR in Fiscal Year 2025 were negatively impacted by third-party check receiving and processing delays in April,” the report noted. “Those check payments, estimated at over $200 million, are included in the May revenue report.”

Racine DA Patricia Hanson Expresses Fury at Tony Evers as 3 Killers, Gun Offender, Repeat Drunk Driver Seek Commutation

The Racine County District Attorney, Patricia Hanson, is raising serious concern about Gov. Tony Evers' newly announced commutation process after three convicted killers, a...

Before There Was a ‘Karen’, There Was a ‘Hanoi Jane’

With the recent passing of cable mogul Ted Turner, it was mentioned that this 85-year-old CNN creator, who changed the future of news broadcasting,...
rebecca cooke

3rd Congressional District: A Navy SEAL (Derrick Van Orden) and That ‘Political Operative’ in a Broken Down Car (Rebecca Cooke)

I knew there was something off about Rebecca Cooke’s campaign for Congress in the 3rd congressional district the LAST time she ran, and lost....
rebecca cooke

Rebecca Cooke’s Business Closed & Her Nonprofit Spent More on Employees Than Grants in Recent Tax Form

Leftist congressional candidate Rebecca Cooke touts her nonprofit and small business leadership on the campaign trail. However, a closer look at Red Letter Grant...

Democrats Come for Tony Evers Like Walkers in the ‘Walking Dead,’ Tom Tiffany Delivers on Virgal’s Pickles at State GOP Convention, and More

Democrats came at Tony Evers like walkers in the "Walking Dead," hungry for flesh. They now despise the popular governor of their own party...

SURPLUS DEAL GOES DOWN: Fran Hong Takes Your Tips, Tony Evers Crashes Out

You know, if Tony Evers wasn’t about to empty the state prisons of dangerous criminals with his new nefarious commutation scheme, I might have...
mark born

Republican Legislators Tout Deal to Eliminate Tax on Tips, Overtime, Give Taxpayers Back Their Own Money NOW

State Assembly Republicans touted the bipartisan deal that was crafted by GOP legislative leaders and Gov. Tony Evers to immediately return more than $800...
Ana Berrios

Fraternal Order of Police Slams Milwaukee Judge Ana Berrios for Prioritizing Inmate’s Communication ‘Privileges’ Over Victim’s Safety

The FOP "is calling for an immediate review of policies governing inmate communication privileges within the Milwaukee County Jail, particularly in cases involving repeated...
tony evers

SURPLUS MELTDOWN! Democrats Turn On Evers & Other Crazy Stuff That Happened Today

Democrat Gov. Tony Evers and Republican leaders Robin Vos and Devin LeMahieu released a bipartisan plan over how to use the massive budget surplus....
tim kay

Judge Tim Kay Threatened to Put Accused Speeder in Jail for Leaving 1-Star Google Review, Records Say

"I didn't realize it was against the law to leave a one-star review on a law firm" - accused speeder Matt Kolb. "And don't you...

DEI Led to Ex-Sun Prairie School Leader’s Child Porn Crimes Says Attorney

(The Center Square) – There are accusations of DEI in the child pornography case that earned a former Sun Prairie school official almost two decades in prison.

A federal judge sentenced Robert Gilkey-Meisegeier to 18 years in prison for possessing child pornography. Gilkey-Meisegeier pleaded guilty earlier this year.

Prosecutors say he had sexual and explicit pictures of at least two students at Sun Prairie West High School. Gilkey-Meisegeier was the school’s dean of students.

He initially denied having a relationship with the students, but later admitted to what he did, including that he bought one student a car, and bought another student alcohol.

WMTV in Madison reported Gilkey-Meisegeier’s lawyer said to reporters outside the courtroom that his client was a victim of both of fetal-alcohol syndrome, and of Sun Prairie Schools’ lax hiring and supervision policies.

“What qualifications did he have for that? What training did he have for that? What supervision did he get for that? None,” the station reported attorney Chris Van Wagner said after the sentencing.

Van Wagner said Gilkey-Meisegeier was promoted to dean of students despite not having the qualifications for the job.

“They didn’t really look. Why? Because they had a person of color who had a degree. It was in the post-George Floyd era. It was in the DEI era. And the last thing they were going to do was remove a young black man who they viewed as a professional staffer who was apparently popular with and supported by the young people of color in the high school in a district where young people of color were becoming more numerous,” Van Wagner said.

Sun Prairie Schools denied those claims.

"[The district] never condones behavior that could endanger the welfare of a child by any employee and continues to reinforce with all staff the collective expectation that student safety remains paramount at all times," Sun Prairie Schools said in a statement.

Gilkey-Meisegeier did not have a teaching license. He was working while that license was being processed. He also had a criminal recording, including drunk driving convictions.

Gilkey-Meisegeier is not the only one facing charges in the case. Sun Prairie West's now-former principal is facing state charges for failing to report child abuse. She is challenging those charges in Dane County.

Wisconsin Congressmen Push For End to Vehicle Emissions Testing

(The Center Square) – A group of Wisconsin congressmen have introduced a bill that would allow Wisconsin to petition to have its air quality designation change and remove the requirement for vehicle emissions testing in Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Sheboygan, Washington and Waukesha counties.

A group of Wisconsin state representatives sent a letter to Wisconsin’s congressional delegation in December and Congressman Tom Tiffany stood with state leaders in late March stating he would push the Environmental Protection Agency to change Clean Air Act rules to remove the emissions testing requirements.

The seven counties are part of a nonattainment area that the lawmakers said shows pollution from Chicago and outside the state with no more than 10% of the pollution measured coming from Wisconsin.

Tiffany, R-7th Congressional, along with Reps. Bryan Steil, R-1st Congressional, Scott Fitzgerald R-5th Congressional and Glenn Grothman, R-6th Congressional, introduced the Fair Air Standards Act to allow states to petition to remove themselves from the status based upon where the pollution originates.

“This is a topic we’ve been working on for 25 years, as the poorly drafted Clean Air Act has punished industries in Wisconsin, making them less competitive, especially compared to other states and factories around the world,” Grothman said in a statement.

The testing is funded through a 1-cent per gallon petroleum tax with an estimated $271.4 million spent by Wisconsin residents from 1984 to 2022-23 on testing.

Lawmakers have cited advanced technology and a low failure rate of 3.1% and 3% in 2021 and 2022.

“Because of outdated federal rules, hundreds of thousands of Wisconsin drivers in seven counties are forced to complete emissions tests every two years just to renew their registration,” Tiffany said. “Wisconsin families should not be punished with costly and time-consuming mandates because of pollution drifting in from Illinois and Indiana.

"Four decades later and with cleaner vehicles on the road, it is time to end this non-attainment zone mandate and stop burdening drivers with a system that cannot prove it works.”

Paul Dedinsky

Paul Dedinsky Announces Run For Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge

Longtime Prosecutor Paul Dedinsky announced his campaign for a seat on the Waukesha County Circuit Court, Branch 3, with the endorsements of Wisconsin Supreme...

Outrage Grows Over Minocqua Brewing Company’s Post About Trump Assassination Attempt

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate Tom Tiffany is asking that Democratic candidate Francesca Hong comment on a post by fellow Democrat Kirk Bangstad and Minocqua Brewing that said a “a brother or sister in the Resistance needs to work on their marksmanship” after a shooter attempted to run past security at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

Bangstad’s company posted that it would be a free beer day if President Donald Trump dies.

Hong reportedly donated $25 to Bangstad’s 2020 campaign for state assembly.

Congressional candidate Rebecca Cooke, running again against incumbent Derrick Van Orden, reportedly previously did work for Bangstad’s campaign.

Bangstad’s post caught the attention of social media accounts such as Libs of TikTok and media outlets across the country. In response, Bangstad made several posts about reporters who reached out for comment, posting their cellphone numbers and criticizing the outlets, including Newsweek, Fox News and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.

Rep. Tusler: Wisconsin Tribes Agreed to Microbetting Ban, Self-exclusion Practices

(The Center Square) - Wisconsin’s tribes agreed to a ban on micro betting on small events such as the result of an individual pitch in a baseball game along with several responsible gaming concessions in order to get the votes necessary to pass the state’s new sports wagering bill, according to Rep. Ron Tusler, R-Harrison.

Tusler said on Thursday that the tribes first declined the requests but ultimately agreed with a group of Wisconsin legislators to ban the use of credit cards, use an age verification system, allow self-exclusion and allowing users to put a cap on daily deposits.

“I shared these concerns with many of my Republican colleagues, who expressed similar hesitation,” Tusler said. “For that reason, I opposed the bill throughout most of the legislative process. However, I realize that unregulated sports gambling is already occurring in Wisconsin, unchecked, on sites like FanDuel and DraftKings. Further, there has been no effort to enforce our laws on these sites.”

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers signed the sports wagering bill into law April 9 and is negotiating compacts with Wisconsin’s 11 tribes to send revenue from gaming from the tribes to the state. Those compacts must be approved by the federal government.

“Although not perfect, these limitations are better than unregulated and unchecked betting in this state," Tusler said. "I will be watching closely as the tribes amend the sports gambling compact to include these provisions and work vigorously to provide more resources to help problem gamblers. Our goal should be to reduce the amount of people gambling, and I will work with both Republicans and Democrats to achieve this.”

The law changed the state’s definition of “bet” to allow the state’s tribes to offer mobile sports wagering if the bettor is in Wisconsin and the sportsbook servers are on tribal land, an amendment to current compacts allowing for casino gambling and sports wagering on tribal lands despite the state’s ban on betting.

The law allows for a similar sports wagering model as Florida, where the state’s sportsbook operators have servers on federally recognized tribal lands while users can be in the state of Wisconsin.

“I have long been against sports betting in Wisconsin,” Tusler said. “In 2018, the Supreme Court struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which made sports betting illegal in the United States. Since then, I have had the unfortunate opportunity to see the effects of unchecked, legalized sports betting across the country.

“From what I have seen, unregulated, legalized sports betting has caused more harm than good in these states.”

Prices Continue to Rise, Home Sales Up in Wisconsin in March

(The Center Square) – Rising prices are not scaring Wisconsin home buyers away.

The latest Wisconsin Realtors Report, for March, shows another increase in prices. But it also shows a sizable jump in sales.

“Sales rebounded in March after a slow start in January and February. As we enter the peak period for sales, it’s good to see this bounce in closings, and hopefully it continues into the summer," Realtors chairwoman Amy Curler said.

March 2026 home sales jumped 7% compared to March of 2025. The real estate agends said they closed on 4,750 homes last month, compared to 4,441 last March.

Since January, home sales in Wisconsin have steadily grown.

According to the report, sales were up more than 2% for the first quarter of 2026. That is noteworthy, particularly because prices are growing as well.

"The annual appreciation of home prices ticked up, rising 6.5%, and the modest improvements in family income and mortgage rates just kept pace with that price increase. Supply remains tight, so we really need to see consistent reductions in mortgage rates for affordability to improve," Realtors CEO Tom Larson added.

The median price for a home in Wisconsin increased last month, jumping to $330,000. That's a 6.5% increase from March of last year.

That is, of course, the statewide median price. Homes in the Madison-area remain more expensive. The median price for a house in south central Wisconsin hit $395,000 last month. Homes in southeast Wisconsin, which includes Milwaukee, saw a median price of $340,000.

Homes in central and northern Wisconsin remain the only ones with a median price less than $300,000. The Realtors report said the median price there is $272,000. The median price in northern Wisconsin saw a median price of $275,000.

The report adds that interest rates on 30-year mortgages have fallen, but the real estate agents said there continues to be not enough homes for sales.

White House Correspondents’ Dinner Shooter Faces Formal Charges

The California man accused of charging security and shooting a Secret Service officer at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner Saturday night will appear Monday in federal court.

Among other possible charges, the 31-year-old suspect, Cole Tomas Allen, is facing two counts of using a firearm during a crime of violence and one count of assault on a federal officer using a dangerous weapon, media outlets reported.

“It is clear that this individual was intent on doing as much harm as he could,” U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro posted on social media. “Thank God for our law enforcement who acted so quickly to prevent what could have been a horrific event.”

President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, and members of Trump's cabinet were at the event and were rushed out of the banquet hall of the Washington, D.C. Hilton., less than two miles from the White House.

The Hilton was also the place where John Hinckley Jr. shot President Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981.

A long gun and shell casings were recovered at the scene, where Allen was detained. No one else but the Secret Service agent, who Trump said he spoke to and was doing OK, sustained injuries during the incident.

The Center Square's White House Bureau Chief Sarah Roderick-Fitch was in attendance at the event, and said she heard a loud noise before attendees started screaming. Secret Service agents then stormed the room and began escorting people out, Roderick-Fitch said.

Federal law enforcement officers searched the suspect's California home and interviewed members of his family.

According to reports from media outlets, Allen was an amateur video game developer and a tutor from Torrence, California. He graduated from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena in 2017 and donated $50 to the campaign of then presidential candidate Kamala Harris through ActBlue.

Allen’s “manifesto” sent to family members before the attack, which the New York Post reported Sunday, said he wanted to minimize casualties at the hotel but, "I would still go though most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most "chose" to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn't come to that."

Allen may enter a plea during his Monday arraignment.

sara rodriguez

It’s Obvious Tony Evers Can’t Stand Sara Rodriguez…But Why?

It's the weirdest story in Wisconsin politics right now, and among the least covered. Tony Evers can't stand his own lieutenant governor, Sara Rodriguez. Well,...