Tuesday, September 10, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Tuesday, September 10, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

REPUBLISHED: Kenosha Affordable Auto Sales Owner Discusses Arsons

spot_img

We are republishing articles from the Kenosha riots to remind voters what occurred that week. Tony Evers, Mandela Barnes, and Josh Kaul – as well as weak local leadership – must be held accountable for surrendering the city to a criminal mob. 

We were there. We witnessed a credit union being torched in front of us by arsonists and a government building and businesses ablaze with zero pushback by police and no presence by the National Guard. The mainstream media were nowhere to be found amidst the mayhem. It was the second day Kenosha burned. Evers and Barnes were inciting the violence with reckless statements, and Kaul stood negligently silent.

David Prill, the owner of Affordable Auto Sales in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was guarding his own business the night that arsonists lit a series of buildings on fire throughout downtown Kenosha. The suspects burned down an office furniture store and then walked across the street and tried to smash in Prill’s door.

When they saw Prill was there, armed, they left and walked in the direction of a Department of Corrections building that started on fire next.

David Prill caught them on video, which you can see below.

On Tuesday, Sept. 1, President Donald Trump stopped at a burned business across the street from Prill’s shop in the riot-torn city.

Exclusive video obtained by Wisconsin Right Now captures the moment the arson suspects lit a major fire that destroyed the office furniture store on Tuesday, Aug. 25, in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Prill, who shared the video with the news site, believes it shows the four arson suspects methodically start the store on fire before trying to break into his used car business across the street. It was the first video and information about arson suspects to emerge publicly from Kenosha since a series of arson fires destroyed businesses and buildings in that community.

“These guys are walking with a purpose…They’re on a mission,” said David Prill, the owner of Affordable Auto Sales, of the suspects. His business is located at 1118 60th St., directly across the street from the blaze.

In addition, another witness described to Wisconsin Right Now seeing a man, armed with a walkie talkie, appearing to organize a heavily armed group of people in cars, right before the fires broke out.

Prill allowed Wisconsin Right Now journalists Jessica McBride and Jim Piwowarczyk to record the surveillance video, a recording of which he said is also in the possession of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which is investigating the arson fires that exploded throughout Kenosha on Monday and Tuesday. The fires ignited right as police pushed crowds of Black Lives Matter protesters out of a courthouse park and into city streets. The suspects first appear on the video along with the BLM protest crowd before focusing on B & L Office Furniture.

A GoFundMe page set up to help B & L Office Furniture has raised almost $45,000 as of Aug. 30.

Watch the surveillance video provided to Wisconsin Right Now here. It includes Prill’s narration with Jessica McBride and Jim Piwowarczyk of Wisconsin Right Now:

This is a longer version of Prill narrating his surveillance video. This version starts with the people spilling into the streets, and it also shows more people damaging his cars.

Prill, in analyzing the video with the journalists, said he believes that four Black male suspects started the fire at the office furniture store before trying to smash the door and enter his business across the street. However, Prill and others were armed inside his own business, guarding it, and when they made that known to the men, they left. He said they then walked in the direction of the Community Corrections building that, a few minutes later, also erupted in flames. “We were inside and we chased them off,” he said of his own business.

Prill said that other suspects used bats and bricks to break windows on his cars, and one also had a shield. But the arson suspects were different. “Those guys had no interest in destroying cars, no interest in breaking windows,” he said. “They’re not breaking any windows or cars. They were just here to burn stuff. They came prepared to burn stuff. They didn’t smash one window. They didn’t take one thing…You can trail them. Right after they set it, they come over here. These guys are walking with a purpose…They’re on a mission.” They then threw rocks at and tried to come through his door.

When police pushed protesters out of the courthouse park, a “big wave” of them came down the street. “You’ll see some guys over there on the corner,” he said. “They’re there messing around, and they light something with what appears to be a roman candle…The roman candle, they throw it in.” He said the office furniture store that was set on fire is “a third-generation” store.”

He said about “5% of the people” on the streets that night “did 100% of the damage.”

“All had masks on,” Prill said of the men he believes set the fire based on tracking them in the surveillance video footage from his business.

“There were four individuals, young Black males. There were four altogether in the group…We watched them light it up, and they did just throw it in the furniture place and from there they directly came over here. They busted down the front door…as soon as they made entry, we made them aware we were there, and they left pretty fast.”

He was armed. “I had to. The police watched it happen. They had squads going up and down the road. They saw it going on. I called the police. I called the fire department,” Prill said. He said he believes the men who damaged his door lit the furniture store on fire because he can trail their path in the video and see the fire start at the store. He said that’s what his “eyes tell me,” although he admitted he can’t say 100 percent.

The video, which is being published for the first time here and which was recorded on Aug. 25, also shows other people damaging and jumping on Prill’s cars in his lot.

Abdul Adaoud is the manager of a gas station in the area where the arson fires occurred, although that business didn’t burn. He told Wisconsin Right Now that he’s also seen video of the arson suspects. He described them as “like four people, maybe outsiders.” He said the arsonists and vandals are “destroying Kenosha.” Before the damage, the gas station was “booming,” he said, but now “it’s dead. People don’t want to stop.” He, too, felt the police “could have reacted way faster. They left it for us to protect ourselves. That’s not our job.”

“That was actually not Kenosha,” alleged Kenosha resident, Corvette Thompson, a military veteran, in an interview with Wisconsin Right Now on Aug. 29. “Those were out of town people.”

“I was up here at this gas station. There was a guy,” he said of Aug. 25, the night of the arson fires.

“They were organized. I didn’t know what they were going to do…They was like man, ‘We’re going to go here…’ He (the leader) gave them orders. They took off and left. Like eight cars. They went down here to 63rd. They turned right. The next thing I know, all uptown was on fire,” he said, referring to Aug. 25. “Most of them giving the orders was Black guys. They was like bullet proof stuff and walkie talkies. They was organized as hell. There was like eight cars of them…” He said they were saying, “You be the first one to go, you be second, you be third… the next thing I knew uptown was on fire.”

He said he has lived in the area for 30 years and knows everyone in the area, and he didn’t recognize any of the people. “He (the leader) was lining the cars up…he had a walkie talkie… I didn’t know who the hell he was,” Thompson said. He said they were wearing all black and black Army pants. “Everybody had weapons. They had a lot.” He said the lead organizer was a “Black male, medium built, clean shaved and everything. Actually, to be honest with you a decent looking guy.”

He’s also upset police pushed the protesters out of the park. “Why you going to push that into my front yard. I have my kids up here. Why are you also going to push them into a residential area?”

We did a live stream of the arson fires, which also captured Prill’s business, the night of the blazes. Our Aug. 25 live stream started shortly after the fires were already set.

The following day, police again pushed protesters out of the park. Clashes ensued between different groups, including people who came to protect people and property. A pro-police teenager from Illinois, Kyle Rittenhouse, is now charged with homicide in the shooting deaths of two men; his attorney says he acted in self defense in the face of a “vicious” “mob attack,” but prosecutors argue otherwise.


David Prill Believes the Kenosha Police Pushed Protesters Toward the Businesses & Plans a Civil Lawsuit Against the City

Kenosha arson suspects
A credit union burns that night.

The small business owner described what happened that night as “chaos. Everyone was up at the park up there protesting and then the police tear gassed everybody, which I don’t think that was a great idea at all. All that did was flush everybody over here to the businesses. All these people flood us after being tear gassed and pepper sprayed and now they’re already agitated…The cops stayed back there. They just let them come all the way up here. They didn’t stop them, and they ran through, and everywhere they ran through, they messed up. I don’t understand why they can’t be in the park; there’s nothing to wreck in the park. That’s a public park. If they’re going to be somewhere, that’s where they’re going to be.”

Prill said he and other business owners want to file a class action civil lawsuit against the city. He also said no one from city government has extended a hand, but federal ATF agents have spoken to him several times.

Prill said his insurance company is coming to his business to assess the damage on Aug. 31. “I’ll never be whole from this,” he said. “Every car has a deductible, not just one, and I’ll never be able to get insurance again.” He said 62 cars were damaged on his lot, including multiple vehicles that were burned, and he has a $1,000 deductible on each car capped at $50,000 total.

“This is all I’ve ever done,” said the Burlington, Wisconsin-raised Prill. “My dad had a lot. I’ve always wanted a lot. We just bought this building six months ago…This is all I’ve ever done, and this is where I wanted to be at this point in my life too.”

Kenosha arson suspects
Prill showing the video to jim piwowarczyk and jessica mcbride.

He added: “I am not rich. I work 80 hours a week. I have my bad months; I have my good months. I’m the same as everyone else who punches a clock. The big misconception is that business owners will be OK. No, man, this might put me out of business.”

He brought up the homicide charges against 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse and claimed Rittenhouse was part of a group that was “hired by the car lot that got torched… these were hired protection.” He said that owner has several businesses and after the first one was burned on Monday, he brought in protection on Tuesday.

Prill rejects media coverage labeling Rittenhouse a “vigilante,” saying, “He was being chased. They surrounded the kid. In the morning, he was cleaning graffiti…they were over here, walking up and down. They didn’t have their guns on them during the day.” He believes the charges “will be dropped. They did it to save face.”

But because of the charges, he doesn’t feel comfortable guarding his own business while armed anymore. “Ever since Kyle was charged, you can’t even protect your own things,” said Prill. “The cops won’t protect it, and they won’t let us protect it.”

Comments Governor Tony Evers made after the police shooting of Jacob Blake “undermined the police” and almost gave a “green light” to people to cause trouble, he said.

“I’ll go forward. I always go forward. This is a great city; it’s going to continue be a great city,” he said.

Prill added, “No one reached out from Kenosha police, and they know I have cameras.”


The ATF’s National Response Team Came to Kenosha

Kenosha riots
Photo: jim piwowarczyk

According to a press release from the ATF, its National Response Team arrived in Kenosha to “assist investigating arson cases.”

“The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Milwaukee Field Office, the Kenosha Police Department, the Kenosha Fire Department, the Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation, and the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Office, in conjunction with the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin are seeking to speak to persons of interest who could advance the arson investigations of over 20 businesses and approximately 12 government owned vehicles that were set ablaze between August 24 and 25 in Kenosha,” the release says.

“We welcome the additional resources of ATF’s National Response Team, as they work in coordination with our officers to review surveillance video and follow leads to identify persons of interest,” said Kenosha Police Chief Daniel Miskinis. “We now need the public’s help to identify and hold these individuals accountable for the victimization of the business owners and members of our community who were affected by these arsons.”

Kenosha arson suspects
Photo: jim piwowarczyk

“Partnership is key in investigating these arsons,” said Special Agent in Charge Kristen de Tineo, of the ATF Chicago Field Division, which oversees the Milwaukee Field Office. “The members of ATF’s National Response Team bring specialized talent and resources to assist the local police and fire departments in determining who is responsible for setting these fires. The expertise of the local departments, with assistance not only from the NRT but also the community, will bring resolution to these investigations. We need the public’s assistance in identifying those responsible, so we can bring them to justice.”

hartford union high school students

Hartford Union High School Students Plant 2,977 Flags to Remember Sept. 11

By Madeline Mazur, Hartford Union High School student On Sunday, Sept. 8, high schoolers at Hartford...
trump debates harris

As Trump Debates Harris, the Economy Remains Top of Mind in Wisconsin

"Are you better off now than you were four years ago?" This is an opinion piece...
reagan movie review

Reagan Movie Review: Why the Elite, Snobby Film Critics Are Wrong

Was Ronald Reagan perfect? No. But he was the perfect man for the time. Was...
kamala dnc

How Kamalanomics Trickles Down [Up Against the Wall]

First, I have to say a word to President Trump. Dude, the next time you’re...
prairie du chien police

Suspected Venezuelan Gangster Attacked Wisconsin Juvenile, Prairie du Chien PD Says

A suspected Venezualan gang member who is not a U.S. citizen now has an ICE...

Communicating With Gen Z [Up Against the Wall]

This is an opinion column. I do feel kind of bad for Gen Z. They’ve had...

Milwaukee Police Respond to Call That Rioting Students Took Over a School

Milwaukee police responded en masse after a caller stated that rioting students "have taken over"...

BREAKING: Milwaukee Police Search for Suspect in Serious Hit & Run of 2 Pedestrians

Milwaukee Police are looking for a suspect wanted for recklessly endangering safety and hit &...
Rebecca Cooke

We’ve Recovered Leftist Political ‘Consultant’ Rebecca Cooke’s Deleted Website

Thank goodness for the Wayback Machine. It's captured the political website that leftist Wisconsin Congressional...
green bay packers brazil

Green Bay Packers Should Refuse to Play in Brazil in Support of Free Speech: State Rep

Wisconsin state Rep. John Macco is calling on the Green Bay Packers to move Friday's...

Report: Unions Pursue Law Changes to Boost Membership

Unions see a clear path through the legislature to boost membership after several legal challenges saw workers leave in droves.

This, according to a new report released Wednesday that grades public sector labor laws across the nation. The data was compiled by the Commonwealth Foundation, a policy group that focuses on fiscal conservancy.

David Osborne, senior fellow for labor policy at the foundation, said during a media briefing that government privatization, changing demographics and a 2018 Supreme Court decision, Janus v. AFSCME Council 31, have caused membership rates across the nation’s four largest public sector unions to fall more than 320,000 over the last five years.

The decline represents $106.8 million in annual dues and fees, according to the report.

“The overarching theme is that the unions have really responded to the membership losses since JANUS to drive up union membership,” Osborne said.

In the JANUS decision, courts held that unions could no longer collect “fair share” dues from non-members who benefit from collective bargaining agreements. Follow-up litigation has challenged the cumbersome process many former members had to overcome to leave the union and recoup dues improperly withheld.

In the report, states known as union “strongholds” scored lower than others that have enacted collective bargaining reforms.

Illinois, Michigan and Maryland stood out for unprecedented reforms that, in some cases, have constitutionally rooted union protections and tipped the scales in favor of executives, according to the report.

Illinois, for example, enshrined collective bargaining rights into the state constitution, which extended unionizing rights to every workplace, including those once considered inappropriate. Osborne said the “experiment could have really disastrous implications,” such as raising taxes to fund “outrageous” union demands.

He pointed to recent collective bargaining negotiations with Chicago Public Schools, during which leadership asked for abortion care access, affordable housing, homeless shelters in schools and all-electric bus fleets.

“The legislature wouldn’t have any opportunity to overrule that behavior,” Osborne said. “It would take a constitutional amendment to correct that balance.”

California, Pennsylvania and Vermont have considered similar amendments – the latter two more seriously, he added.

In Michigan, which slipped from a “B” to a “D” over the last two years, lawmakers repealed the“paycheck protection” law – which prevents public payroll systems from deducting union dues and political contributions – as was the state’s Right to Work provision. The state also gives unions access to employees’ personal information.

Some 13 other states give unions the same data collection power. In Hawaii, unions even store Social Security numbers to verify workers’ identities. The report says the practice leaves information vulnerable to ransomware attacks – like one that happened earlier this year in California.

Maryland, Delaware and California also offer tax incentives for union membership as way to boost recruits. While Delaware’s labor laws earned a "D" in the report, Maryland and Delaware – along with Illinois, Oregon and Washington – earned an “F” grading.

The nation’s four largest public sector unions – the American Federation of Teachers; the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the National Education Association; and the Service Employees International Union – collectively represent 6.6 million workers.

AFSCME, according to records submitted to the U.S. Department of Labor, has lost 7.5% of its members since 2017, outpacing the other three unions between 2.8 percentage points and 4 percentage points.

“I do think JANUS is playing a big role in this,” said Andrew Holman, a policy analyst at the Commonwealth Foundation. “And I think after the decision, people are becoming more and more aware of what their dollars are being put toward and are saying, 'I don’t want to be a part of this.'”

Osborne said 60% of membership fees, albeit funneled through outside organizations, support political causes. Even though members may be aligned ideologically, many feel “uncomfortable” with resolutions that take positions on issues like the war in Gaza or abortion rights.

Unions have refuted this claim in the past, such as the Pennsylvania State Education Association, which is under review by several state agencies for alleged funneling of union dues to support Gov. Josh Shapiro's 2022 campaign. The state's labor laws scored a "D" in the report.

“None of the issues seem to relate to what it is to be a teacher, for instance, so many of the members come home feeling like my union has really taken a stance on these political matters that have divided the workplace rather than united it,” Osborne said.

Of the highest-ranking states, Florida “sets a new gold standard,” according to the foundation. The most impactful reform, Osborne said, requires unions to run for “recertification” once membership drops below 60%. This means workers can decide whether to keep representation.

“We’ve seen a bunch of unions fail to file for reelection because they know they’ll lose,” Osborne said. “This ends up removing a union that never had majority support to begin with.”

Wisconsin and Iowa also require recertification. Unions in other states – like Pennsylvania, Illinois, New York and California – have never run for “reelection” since organizing in the 1970s.

full rfk jr video

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Files Lawsuit to Remove His Name From Wisconsin Ballot

(The Center Square) – Former Independent party presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Election Commission to remove his name from the state’s ballot this November, part of his ongoing battle to exit from races in swing states.

The case argues that, absent a compelling reason, different treatment for third party candidates violates the Equal Protection Clause and Kennedy’s First Amendment rights. It claims the different deadlines for ballot withdrawal for Democrat and Republican candidates versus third-party candidates–September 3 for the former and August 6 for the latter–are unlawfully discriminatory.

“Third parties can’t be treated differently and they can’t be discriminated against. Yet that’s what happened here. The Republicans and the Democrats have until today at 5 p.m. to withdraw their nominees and replace them with someone else,” the lawsuit argues. “But those rules don’t apply to independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr…He has not been treated fairly or equally with the other presidential candidates who declared and ran for the presidency and have since wanted to withdraw.”

In its certification of presidential candidates last week, the WEC voted 5-1 to put Kennedy on the ballot, despite his withdrawal and endorsement of Republican nominee and former president Donald Trump. Following the decision, county clerks were authorized to begin printing ballots.

But Kennedy has argued his request is not unreasonable since Wisconsin election law already provides exceptions for candidate removal post-certification, including in the case of candidate death or for personal and health reasons–provided the Democrat or Republican candidate meets the September 3rd deadline.

“Kennedy has (like President Biden) decided that for associational and expressive reasons, he does not want to run for President anymore. The deadlines prevent him from withdrawing, even though the Democratic and Republican Parties (at least in theory) could provide a different nominee to the Commission today,” the case says, arguing this proves “The Commission cannot claim any compelling state interest in forcing Independent candidates to file paperwork a month earlier.”

Due to these reasons, the lawsuit requests a stay on the WEC’s ruling and for Dane County Circuit Court to issue an order barring the agency from placing Kennedy’s name on the ballot.

Alexa Gives VERY Biased Responses, Pushing Kamala Harris’s Candidacy | WATCH

We asked Amazon's Alexa device: "Why should I vote for Donald Trump? Why should I...

Chad Richards: Suspect Identified in the Shooting Death of a UW-Whitewater Student Kara Welsh

UPDATE: Chad Richards appeared in court Tuesday, where a judge set a bond of $1...
american hostages still held by Hamas

BRING THEM HOME: These Are the 4 American Hostages Still Held by Hamas [FULL LIST]

An American hostage, Hersh Goldberg-Polin, was horrifically executed by Hamas while America's President, Joe Biden,...
kamala harris cnn interview

Yes, Kamala Harris’s CNN Interview Was a Total Train Wreck [VIDEO]

Kamala Harris and her emotional support governor, Tim Walz, sat down for her only interview...

Trump Echo: California Republicans Propose No Tax on Tips, Democrats Vote NO

In a mirror of national politics, California Republicans followed former President Donald Trump’s lead by proposing to end taxes on tips. While Vice President Kamala Harris, who formerly represented California in the U.S. Senate, embraced the measure, California Democrats said no, shooting down the proposed amendment in the California Senate.

“Even Trump and Harris both say we should eliminate the ‘tip tax,’” said the California Senate Republican Caucus in a statement.

Soon after Trump announced his proposal to a crowd in Nevada, which has the highest percentage of tipped workers in the nation, Harris also came out in favor of the proposal. The Budget Lab at Yale University reports there are approximately 4 million tipped workers — 2.5% of all workers nationwide. Many tipped workers earn less than the minimum wage, and thus earn the lion's share of their income from tips. Some higher-paid tipped professions such as barbers and hair stylists would also benefit from this rule change.

The bipartisan Committee for Responsible Federal Budget says this proposal would likely reduce government revenue by approximately $15 to $25 billion per year.

In the California Senate, Democrats — except for Senate President Pro Tempore Senator Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, and State Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, who abstained, voted to put aside the amendment, while all nine Republicans voted for it.

With the legislature having narrowly closed a $47 billion budget shortfall this year through cuts, deferrals, and shifts, it's unclear what additional measures the state would need to take to offset revenue losses from a potential state-level exemption.

kamala dnc

Flip-Flop? Harris Under Scrutiny for Changes to Past Stances

Vice President Kamala Harris was once anti-fracking and opposed to former President Donald Trump’s tough immigration policies.

Now, it’s apparently a different story.

In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash this week, Harris was asked about the change in her stance on fracking. Fracking is a major industry and economic driver in the swing state of Pennsylvania, a state where Harris is up a slim 0.8%, according to Real Clear Politics’ polling average.

Harris said during a town hall in 2019 that there is “no question” she supports banning fracking. During the CNN interview, Harris said she does not want to ban fracking and that she “made that clear on the debate stage in 2020.”

“As vice president I did not ban fracking, and as president I will not ban fracking,” Harris said.

Harris has previously said she supports a ban on fracking, offshore drilling, and plastic straws. She also said she supports passing the Green New Deal, which includes a treasure trove of far-left energy policies.

Harris’ inconsistency on the fracking issue has drawn criticism.

”If Kamala Harris can so quickly reject her firm energy positions from the past, there is no telling how quickly she’ll renounce today’s positions in the future,” Daniel Turner, who leads the energy workers advocacy group, Power the Future, said in a statement. “Just like Vice President Harris abandoned her support for Joe Biden after telling the American people he was perfectly fine, she will abandon any position she pretends to have now. Harris is bankrolled by green billionaires who want to ensure the funding of their pet projects continue, so it’s beyond clear that she doesn’t care about the truth of her energy positions, she cares only about keeping the tax dollars flowing.”

During the same CNN interview, Harris said those who illegally cross the border should face “consequences.”

“We have laws that have to be followed and enforced that address and deal with people who cross our border illegally,” Harris said. “And there should be consequence. And let’s be clear, in this race, I’m the only person who has prosecuted transnational criminal organizations who traffic in guns, drugs, and human beings. I’m the only person in this race who actually served a border state as attorney general to enforce our laws. And I would enforce our laws as president going forward. I recognize the problem.”

However, Harris posted on then-Twitter in 2017 that “an undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.”

Harris had also mocked Trump’s border wall during the Trump administration as a “vanity project” but has now expressed her support for a Senate immigration bill that allocates $650 million for building the border wall.

“Funding Trump’s unrealistic border wall would be a gross misuse of taxpayer money,” Harris wrote on Twitter in April of 2018.

A year earlier, Harris called Trump’s wall a “ stupid use of money” and pledged to “block any funding for it.”

It is possible the border wall funding was a concession Harris was willing to make rather than a policy goal.

However, any policy changes are notable since Harris has offered unusually few details on her platform if she were elected president.

Harris’ main campaign website offers no policy platform, and her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention largely avoided policy specifics.

Trump took a jab at Harris at a recent rally on this point.

“Now she’s saying ‘oh we want to build a strong border,’” Trump told his supporters. “Where has she been for three and a half years as we took in 20 million people, many of them horrible criminals?”

Harris is not alone in announcing new policy ideas, apparently to appeal to moderate voters. Trump announced at a recent rally that IVF treatments should be free to women, either paid for by insurers or the government.

trump vs harris

Poll: Trump Inches Ahead; Hovde Surges Forward in Wisconsin

(The Center Square) – A new Emerson College poll of likely voters reveals some changes in Midwest swing states.

Former President Donald Trump has a slim lead over Vice President Kamala Harris in Wisconsin, 49% to 48%, while Harris slightly widened her lead over Trump in Michigan at 50% to 47%.

Independent voters are largely veering towards Harris, with 46% of Michigan Independents choosing Harris, versus 43% for Trump. In Wisconsin, the divide is starker, with 52% choosing Harris and 43% Trump.

Defying previous trends, Republican U.S. Senate candidate for Wisconsin Eric Hovde has improved to 48%, only 1 percentage point behind incumbent Sen. Tammy Baldwin, his opponent.

“We’ve had huge movement in the last 30 days,” Hovde said in a video on X following the poll’s release. “Wisconsin is the number one battleground. Whoever wins Wisconsin will control the White House, and if I win, we’ll not only take control of the U.S. Senate for the next two years, but potentially for the next four years.”

Support for the U.S. Senate candidates in Michigan remains relatively stable, with Democrat Rep. Elissa Slotkin still leading Republican former Rep. Mike Rogers 47% to 41%.

While the economy remains all respondents’ top concern in both states, the issue of immigration has fallen in importance, replaced by “threats to democracy” and housing affordability.

Results also showed voters under 30 overwhelmingly favor the Democratic presidential candidate, with Harris pulling 62% of support in Michigan and 54% in Wisconsin, compared to Trump’s 32% and 41%, respectively.

The survey, conducted August 25-28, included 800 Michigan voters with a +/-3.4% margin of error, and 850 Wisconsin voters with a +/-3.3% margin of error.

zuckerberg censorship

Zuckerberg Censors Kamala Harris Criticism in Battleground Wisconsin After CNN Interview

Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook is actively censoring criticism of Vice President Kamala Harris's CNN interview in...