Saturday, November 15, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Saturday, November 15, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

10 Awful Things Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers Did to the State Today

spot_img

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers went on a veto binge on March 29. Because it was the Friday afternoon right before Easter, you knew it would be bad.

In veto-after-veto of common-sense legislation passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature (41 vetoes in all), Evers chose a radical agenda over the best interests of the state. He threw taxpayers under the bus. Threw cops under the bus. Threw hunters and farmers under the bus. Threw the mentally ill under the bus. Threw daycare providers under the bus!

Here are 10 awful things Evers did with his veto pen today:

1. He Threw Wisconsin Cops Under the Bus

Evers vetoed a bill that would have narrowed the state’s John Doe law so liberal judges (like the slew of former public defenders he’s appointed to the bench) can’t issue criminal complaints against cops in old shooting cases already ruled justified by DAs.

In so doing, he threw Wisconsin’s law enforcement officers under the bus, exposing them to the potentially endless dredging up of already decided old use-of-force cases.

Here’s why the veto is bad: The law has been exploited by anti-cop activists to target cops. It allowed them to dredge back up an old shooting case against former Wauwatosa police officer Joseph Mensah even though the DA had long ago exonerated him, dragging the case back into court before a liberal judge. Luckily, he didn’t end up charged, but the possibilities are nightmarish.

2. Evers Threw Retirees and Taxpayers Under the Bus, Vetoing a $3 Billion Tax Cut

Evers vetoed a bill that would have reduced the tax rate for the third individual tax bracket from 5.3 percent to 4.4 percent beginning with tax year 2023. The bill would have expanded the current retirement income exclusion. Altogether, it was a $3 billion tax cut.

Here’s why the veto is bad: You won’t get to keep more of your money despite those rising grocery store costs.

In continuing his fiscal insanity, Evers also vetoed a bill that “requires a bidding process for school district contracts costing more than $150,000 w/ exception for cases where public health is endangered,” according to reporter AJ Bayatpour.

3. He Wants Non-Citizens to Be Able to Raise Your Taxes

Yes, you read that right. Evers vetoed a bill requiring members of technical school district boards to be citizens.

Here’s why the veto is bad: Those boards have the authority to tax and spend. Thus, Evers thinks non-citizens should be able to raise your taxes, which is an exercise of governmental authority over the citizenry.

4. He’s Okay With Universities Demanding Loyalty Pledges for DEI or Political Ideologies

Evers vetoed a bill that would have banned higher education loyalty tests for faculty and staff.  The bill would prohibit universities from requiring loyalty pledges of allegiance “to support for, or opposition to  a political ideology or movement, including with respect to diversity, equity or inclusion.”

Here’s why the veto is bad: So much for free speech. Universities are hardly havens of ideological tolerance as it is.

5. He Doesn’t Want College Students to Be Exempted From Immunization Requirements Due to Religious Beliefs

The bill Evers vetoed also would ban college students from being exempted for health reasons or personal conviction.

Here’s why the veto is bad: So much for bodily autonomy and freedom of religion.

6. Evers Wants to Limit Who Can Be a School Superintendent

Evers ensured the centralized power of the State Department of Public Instruction’s liberal-controlled bureaucracy, vetoing a bill that would allow school boards to hire superintendents who don’t have a DPI license.

Here’s why the veto is bad: We need more superintendents who come from the business world. There’s also a shortage. We should pick the best person to run school districts and consider a wealth of past experiences. Milwaukee Public Schools already has an exemption.

“As a result, we remain locked in with some of the strictest licensing requirements in the region, which exacerbates our workforce problems,” bill co-author state Sen. Duey Stroebel said to the Journal Sentinel. “Being superintendent is like being the CEO of a company. One does not need to have spent a lifetime in the field to effectively manage the professionals working for you. There are probably thousands of Wisconsinites who would do a great job serving their communities in this role who have not spent their entire careers licensed in a classroom. This veto maintains the absolute prohibition on locally elected officials considering anyone outside the box.”

7. Evers Vetoed a Bill to Help Solve Wisconsin’s Teacher Shortage

According to the Institute for Reforming Government, the bill, Senate Bill (SB) 917 – the teacher apprenticeship bill – “would have given every four-year college in Wisconsin another tool to help solve the teacher shortage.”

Here’s why the veto is bad: “Wisconsin needs to graduate more great teachers. 18% of the teachers we do get quit before their third year. 30 states and counting are fixing it with ‘teacher apprenticeships’ – integrating two years of real-life, mentor-led classroom training into the college experience. This quadruples student teaching practice while lowering debt,” IRG explains.

“SB 917 would have gotten more teachers into the classroom by raising teaching standards and lowering other barriers to graduation. All four-year colleges could have opted into solving the teacher shortage crisis.”

Although Evers will “introduce a teacher apprenticeship pilot program in 2024,” students “in Milwaukee, Madison, Wisconsin Rapids, and rural western Wisconsin will not be able to access this affordable, experience-based program at their local technical colleges. Those are the highest-need regions in the state!” IRG adds.

8. Evers Vetoed a Bill to Allow Wisconsinites to Have Greater Options for Mental Health Services

According to IRG, Assembly Bill (AB) 541 – the tele-mental health bill – would have “allowed Wisconsinites greater options to access services from telehealth providers from out of state. This bill had strong bipartisan support in both the Senate and the Assembly and would have dramatically expanded the pool of providers available to those who need it most.”

Here’s why the veto is bad: The bill “would have made mental health care more accessible for Wisconsinites across the state by allowing people to access treatments across state lines,” IRG says. That’s especially true in “rural and underserved areas of the state, and it allowed college students from other states to keep their previous providers remotely.”

9. Evers Threw Hunters & Farmers Under the Bus

According to Fox News, Evers vetoed a bill that “would have required state wildlife managers to set a firm numeric goal for the state’s wolf population.”

Here’s why the veto is bad: “Hunting advocates support setting a population limit, saying the lack of a goal leaves both wolves and people unprotected,” Fox News reported.

This matters to Wisconsin farmers – a lot – because they’re losing livestock and dogs to the wolves. According to the Associated Press, the wolves sometimes attack pets and livestock. See the list of wolf depredations in Wisconsin for 2013 here.

But that’s not all. Evers also vetoed a bill that would have allowed people in specific areas to use dogs to hunt free-roaming wild animals.

Republican Rep. Chanz Green wrote, “My message to these vetoes: Gov. Evers doesn’t represent Northern Wisconsin hunters! The DNR should listen to hunters in Northern Wisconsin, not the other way around.”

10. Evers Rejected an Opportunity to Help Child Care Providers in Wisconsin

Evers has been incessantly whining about the “childcare crisis” and demanding to hand over millions of dollars in checks to daycares in Wisconsin. But now he’s vetoed a “$15 million loan program for child care providers. Evers says it doesn’t do enough to help providers, says they should grants, not loans,” wrote reporter AJ Bayatpour.

Why the veto is bad: Childcare providers could have used the money, but Evers wants, instead, to hand over big checks in the manner done during COVID. We previously documented how millions of dollars went to an out-of-state daycare chain founded by a junk bond king and financed by wealthy Swiss backers. Money also went to daycares with serious child abuse allegations or that operate is affluent areas. The Republican plan was better.

Here’s a round-up of some of Evers’ other Friday afternoon vetoes:

waukesha

City of Waukesha Honors 60 Employees Who Are Veterans

The City of Waukesha, Wisconsin is honoring its 60 employees who are veterans. "Today, we proudly honor all Veterans and give special thanks to the...
oak creek

Oak Creek Fire Department Honors Its Veterans

The Oak Creek Fire Department in Wisconsin is honoring its veterans on Veterans Day 2025. "Happy Veterans Day! The OCFD thanks all of those who...
glendale police

Glendale Police Department Honors Its Veterans

The Glendale, Wisconsin, Police Department is honoring its veterans on Veterans Day 2025. "In honor of #VeteransDay we would like to thank all veterans for...

Elm Grove Police Department Honors Its Veterans

The Elm Grove Police Department is honoring its law enforcement officers who are veterans on Veterans Day 2025. "On Veteran’s Day, the Elm Grove Police...
will martin

11 Interesting Facts About Will Martin, Republican Candidate for Wisconsin Lieutenant Governor

In 2022, there were nine candidates in the Lt. Governor race. After traveling 100,000 miles across Wisconsin over the last 3.5 years championing county...
wisconsin fake electors

Wisconsin ‘Fake Electors’: 11 Facts That Exonerate Them

Here are 11 facts that exonerate the so-called Wisconsin "fake electors." We are republishing this story due to President Donald Trump pardoning 77 people,...
cool joyce studio

‘Cool Joyce Studio’ in Okauchee Is One-of-a-Kind – Just Like Joyce

This story is part of Wisconsin Right Now's effort to champion small businesses and entrepreneurship. If you have an idea for a story, please...
UWM Protesters

Why the Far Left Opposes a Law Defining Antisemitism and Why Wisconsin Needs It

By: Shale Horowitz The Wisconsin legislature will soon vote on a proposed law that the IHRA definition of antisemitism be considered in applying existing Wisconsin...
wisconsin anti-slapp

Republicans Introduce Legislation to Protect Free Speech & Crack Down on Frivolous “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation”

State Senator Eric Wimberger and State Rep. Jim Piwowarczyk introduced legislation Wednesday that they say will protect free speech and help stop frivolous lawsuits...
Governor’s Veto Powers Wisconsin Republicans Parental Bill of Rights Outlaw Child Sex Dolls Embrace Them Both Unemployment Reforms Wisconsin’s Professional Licensing Bail Reform Amendment wisconsin covid-19

Poll: Voters Have a Lack of Name Recognition of Wisconsin Governor Candidates

(The Center Square) – Most voers in Wisconsin haven’t decided who they support to be the state’s next governor, according to a new Marquette Law School poll.

The poll showed that 81% of Democrats and 70% of Republicans have not made their choice in a crowded field to replace Gov. Tony Evers in the Aug. 11, 2026, primary. The general election is Nov. 3, 2026.

Those polled were asked which candidates they knew about with 39% saying they recognize and have an opinion of Rep. Tom Tiffany while 17% recognize Washington County Executive Josh Schoemann and 11% recognize medical service technician Andy Manske.

Of the Democrats Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley has the highest recognition at 26%,with Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez at 25%, State Rep. Francesca Hong at 22%, state Sen. Kelda Roys at 17%, former Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. CEO Missy Hughes at 16%; former state Rep. Brett Hulsey at 15% and Milwaukee beer vendor Ryan Strnad at 11%.

The poll asked 846 registered voters the questions between Oct. 15-22.

The poll had similar responses related to supreme court candidates Maria Lazar and Chris Taylor, with 86% saying they don’t have enough information on Lazar and 84% saying the same about Taylor while 69% of those polled said they did not have enough information on what each candidate stands for.

Report Clearing Biden Biden Approval Rating Americore Biden Acknowledge Hamas Biden Tells Israel Not to Occupy Gaza Biden impeachment Supreme Court Strikes Down Biden’s Student Loan Cancellation

‘Outrageous’: Lawmakers Trash Biden Administration for Targeting, Surveilling 156 Republicans

(The Center Square) – The Biden administration’s probe into President Donald Trump’s 2020 election loss progressed far beyond investigating potential fraud and potentially targeted 156 conservatives and conservative organizations.

Whistleblower-sourced records, made public Wednesday by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, show that the Arctic Frost probe, pushed by Biden administration special counsel Jack Smith, conducted extensive and legally dubious investigations into Trump-supporting Republicans nationwide.

Smith, the FBI, and the Department of Justice spent thousands of taxpayer dollars to collect personal cellular phone data, conduct dozens of interviews, and issue 197 subpoenas to 34 individuals and 163 businesses.

“Arctic Frost was the vehicle by which FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors could improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus. Contrary to what Smith has said publicly, this was clearly a fishing expedition,” Grassley told reporters Wednesday.

“If this had happened to Democrats, they’d be as rightly outraged as we are outraged,” he added. “We’re making these records public in the interest of transparency and so that the American people can draw their own conclusions.”

The records reveal some of the targets on page 60, including multiple state Republican party chairs or former chairs; many state lawmakers and attorneys; individuals believed at the time to be “fake electors;” and conservatives involved in election integrity efforts.

Records of additional individuals and organizations targeted, beginning on page 101, list everyone from Trump campaign staffers to former senior White House advisor Stephen Miller and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino. The list spans multiple states and includes some significant redactions.

The Arctic Frost team also collected phone records of at least nine Republican senators without notifying them, and attempted but failed to collect phone data on others.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., called the records “nothing short of a Biden administration enemies list” and deemed it “far worse, orders of magnitude worse” than the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.

“People need to realize how politicized the Biden administration turned all these agencies,” Johnson said. “It’s outrageous, it should shock every American…we need to get to the bottom of this…so that this doesn’t happen again in America.”

The revelations build on previous documents showing that the Biden administration targeted 92 conservative groups, including the Republican National Committee; Republican Attorneys General Association; the America First Policy Institute; and Turning Point USA, the organization previously headed by political commentator Charlie Kirk, who was fatally shot in September.

In a Truth Social post Wednesday, Trump called the investigators a “disgrace to humanity.”

“These thugs should all be investigated and put in prison,” he said. “Deranged Jack Smith is a criminal!!!”

wisconsin school bus driver

Poll: Wisconsin Voters Prepared to Vote Against Public School Referenda

(The Center Square) – For the first time in the past 10 years of polling, more Wisconsin voters said they would vote against a school referendum than for it.

Fifty-seven percent of voters said they would vote against a referendum in the new Marquette Law School poll.

That compares to 52% in June, 57% in February and 55% in January saying they would vote for a school referendum if it was proposed by a local school board.

The poll asked 846 registered voters the questions between Oct. 15-22.

“This is one to keep an eye on to see if this trend continues or it’s just a fluke of this sample,” Law School Poll Director Charles Franklin said.

The poll also showed that 56% said they believe reducing property taxes is more important than increasing spending on public schools.

That compared to 57% in June, 58% in February and 55% in January who said the same.

Historical Marquette polling showed that 50% first said they would prioritize reducing property taxes in June 2023 after years of polling showing that spending more on public schools was more important to voters.

That total has trended up since the 2023 polling.

“People have gotten more concerned about school spending and property taxes in particular,” Franklin said.

The polling comes after Milwaukee voters said they would prefer consolidating schools over another property tax referendum increase when Embold Research asked 535 likely Milwaukee voters in 2026 the questions between Oct. 6-10 on behalf of City Forward Collective and CFC Action Fund.

Legislators are currently discussing a bill that would require districts to file the required paperwork before being eligible for a referendum.

There also are a set of bills in the works on school consolidation.

Public school enrollment in Wisconsin is expected to decline by 10,000 students annually for the five-year period that began in 2023-24 and the trend is expected to continue.

The bill would provide a consolidation model process, funding for consolidation or shared service feasibility studies and assistance for schools as they try to match up differing levies and determine school board positions when consolidation occurs.

eric toney

Why AG Josh Kaul Should Be Running Scared of Eric Toney 2.0

Eric Toney 2.0 should keep Josh Kaul up at night. Toney, the Fond du Lac County DA, narrowly lost to Kaul last time around by...
eric toney

DA Eric Toney Announces Run for AG, Stresses Crime Lab, Border Enforcement & Bipartisanship

"As Attorney General, I will serve all of you. I will defend the law equally, no matter who holds power, and it's time to...
josh kaul

Josh Kaul’s Record as Attorney General: Crime Lab Mess, Botched Victims’ Audit & Angry Mom

Democrat Josh Kaul announced on October 7 that he is running for state Attorney General again, and Republican DA Eric Toney announced on October...
eric toney

Eric Toney Will Have Broad Statewide Support for WI Attorney General. Look for a Tuesday Announcement

Eric Toney, district attorney of Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin, will once again be running for Attorney General of Wisconsin. Our sources say that on...
barbara dittrich

Hate Has No Home HERE? No Kings Protester’s ‘Is He Dead Yet?’ Shirt Is Sign of Perilous Times

"I was aghast when a constituent texted me the photo of a woman at the October 18th, 'No Kings' protest in my city smiling...

Person Cited for Allegedly Spitting on Table of Turning Point Students at UW-Milwaukee, Campus Says

The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee has cited a person for disorderly conduct who is accused of spitting on the table of Turning Point Action students...
Wisconsin Flat Tax Wisconsin's Social Security wisconsin charter schools

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Legalizing Mobile Sports Wagering

(The Center Square) – A group of Wisconsin lawmakers are proposing a law that would allow mobile sports wagering across the state through the state’s current tribal operators.

The law would allow for a similar sports wagering model as Florida where the state’s sportsbook operators have servers on federally recognized tribal lands while users can be in the state of Wisconsin.

The proposal cites the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 decision not to hear a challenge to the sports wagering pact between Florida and the Seminole tribe of the hub-and-spoke sports wagering model.

Legal sports wagering is currently only allowed on tribal lands in Wisconsin while prediction markets such as Kalshi are now legal across the U.S.

The Ho-Chunk Nation currently has a lawsuit filed against Kalshi for operating in the state.

The bill is being proposed by Reps. Tyler August, R-Walworth, and Kalan Haywood, D-Milwaukee, along with Sens. Howard Marklein, R-Spring Green, and Kristin Dassler-Alfheim, D-Appleton.

“This legislation is an important step to bring Wisconsin in alignment with the majority of the country in regards to sports wagering," Haywood said in a statement. "For too long, illegal, offshore entities have profited from consumers through unregulated sports wagering, without generating revenue for local economies.

"By regulating this multi-billion-dollar industry, we can provide a safer mobile wagering experience for Wisconsin consumers, and generate much needed revenue to invest into our communities.”

Wisconsin receives payments that are a portion of the net win from tribal casinos but does not separately reports sports wagering payments.

In 2024, the state received more than $66 million in shared revenue payments with nearly $66 million in 2023 and nearly $57 million in 2022.

Sports wagering is legal in 39 states with 31 allowing mobile sports wagering.

Sponsors sent out the proposed legislation to fellow lawmakers this week asking for co-sponsors before Oct. 22.

“This bill does not authorize gambling on its own; it only is one part in a multi-step process to create the legal framework necessary for Wisconsin to participate in mobile sports wagering under tribal compacts,” the proposal said. “Gaming compacts between states and tribes need to be federally approved by the U.S. Department of Interior before going into effect.”

Making a sports bet in the state is currently a misdemeanor offense and the bill would exclude from the legal term “bet” any mobile sports wager with an approved sportsbook with servers located on tribal lands.

The bill estimates it will bring hundreds of millions of illegal bets into legal sportsbooks in the state, stating the change “generates new revenue through tribal gaming compacts and reduces consumer risk from offshore operators.”

Jill Underly

Thursday Hearing Set on Sexual Misconduct, Grooming in Wisconsin Schools

(The Center Square) – A hearing is scheduled for 11 a.m. on Thursday to address concerns about sexual misconduct and grooming in schools.

Committee on Government Operations, Accountability and Operations Chair Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, scheduled the hearing and invited State School Superintendent Jill Underly, along with law enforcement.

Nedweski announced Thursday night she would be introducing three bills related to the case including a grooming law, standards for communication between students and faculty and to end a "loophole" where educators can surrender their teaching license rather than facing further investigation.

She had previously been working on the grooming law and bill on communications standards after the case of Kenosha teacher Christian Enwright, who pleaded guilty to 12 misdemeanors for his conduct sending hundreds of Snapchat messages to a student that resulted in a sentence of 450 days in jail and three years of probation.

“Since the Kenosha County Eye exposed Christian Enwright’s predatory behavior toward a student, I have been working on anti-grooming legislation that will establish harsh penalties for any adult convicted of grooming a minor for sexual activity,” Nedweski said in a statement. “This proposal will be modeled after comprehensive laws passed in other states and will give our law enforcement and prosecutors the tools they need to keep children safe.”

Senate Committee on Education Chair John Jagler and Vice Chair Romaine Quinn asked a series of 12 questions of Underly and demanded to get a response within 24 hours of the Thursday afternoon letter on if she will be willing to testify before the committee.

The Senate committee leaders had not heard back from Underly or her office as of 11:30 a.m. on Friday.

The Capital Times report showed that 200 investigations into teachers for sexual misconduct and grooming were shielded from the public by DPI and that accused teachers were able to forfeit their teaching license to avoid further investigation into alleged grooming.

The Center Square was unable to get comment from Underly or Gov. Tony Evers before publication.