Saturday, April 27, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Saturday, April 27, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Milwaukee Judges to Close Court for Racial Equity Conference Featuring Snoop Dogg Film & Anti-Prison Speaker

spot_img

The conference attendees will be treated to a documentary film, executive produced by Snoop Dogg, about Attorney Kimberley Motley’s husband, Claude Motley’s struggles after he was injured during a shooting.

Milwaukee County’s judges and court commissioners are being urged by top court officials to attend a race and equity conference in which the key speaker is a woman who pushes defunding and abolishing police and prisons and advocates “redistribution of resources” to render enforcement “obsolete,” even in cases of violent and gun crime.

How radical is keynote speaker Danielle Sered? She doesn’t even support criminal justice approaches that involve social services AND police/prisons. She opposes the latter entirely, arguing that they are racist and increase violence.

Deputy Chief Judge Carl Ashley, who sent an email to all Milwaukee Judges and Court Commissioners, asked them to clear their court calendars for the day so they and/or attorneys can attend, writing, “We are committed and focused on long-term solutions to criminal behavior and public safety from a racial justice perspective.” We’re told that prosecutors and public defenders are usually among those who attend as well.

The judges and others will watch a documentary movie named “Claude is Shot.” It’s a documentary executive produced by Snoop Dogg, which is about the shooting of Attorney Kimberley Motley’s husband, Claude Motley. Motley is currently involved in a high-profile Milwaukee County case involving former Wauwatosa police officer Joseph Mensah in which a perceived conflict of interest already exists.

The talk is funded through a grant that focuses on “reimagining and rebuilding local criminal justice systems — reducing jail incarceration and increasing equity for all.” Its goal is to reduce jail populations across the county by 50%. This comes at a time when the Milwaukee County Jail is in a staffing crisis, leaving police district stations to house arrestees, sometimes for days, and tying up police resources as a result.

This comes despite the court system facing lengthy backlogs, including in felony cases, that have repeatedly imperiled public safety as defendants are released on the street as violent crime cases dating to 2020 languish with repeated delays. It also comes at a time of skyrocketing violent crime and homicide, which is outpacing even last year’s record high. The event also features a panel with the former and current directors of the City of Milwaukee Office of Violence Prevention.

Previous Milwaukee County “Race, Equity and Procedural Justice Conferences” have featured such topics as “the shared history of racial division in America,” “the science of implicit bias,” a performance called “White Privilege,” and more.

In an email to all Milwaukee County judges and court commissioners on Feb. 11, 2022, Milwaukee County Judge Carl Ashley, wrote,

“Our Race, Equity and Procedural Justice Conference is scheduled for Friday, April 8th at the Milwaukee Library’s Centennial Hall, 733 N. Eighth Street. At this time, we are planning on our conference being in-person in the morning and virtual in the afternoon. Please note that our featured presenter, Danielle Sered (author of ‘Until We Reckon’) will appear virtually in the morning session as well as a panel discussion after her presentation. This will be the seventh conference since 2014. See attached PowerPoint that outlines our previous programs. If COVID for whatever reason prevents any in-person programming, we will proceed virtually.”

Ashley referenced the backlog, saying,

“The planning committee is keenly aware of the backlog of cases and the rise in violence in our community, but we are committed and focused on long-term solutions to criminal behavior and public safety from a racial justice perspective. Although, I sent a notice, back in November to some of you, I should have sent an additional reminder sooner. If you have a calendar on April 8th, we would ask that you consider clearing same because it impacts others who would like to attend and participate in the conference, particularly attorneys.”

(Full email is at the bottom of the article)

A 2019 article by the State Bar of Wisconsin called Ashley a “leader in evidence-based diversion programs in the justice system.” He’s a former public defender who became a Milwaukee County judge in 1999.

Who is Danielle Sered, the keynote speaker?


Danielle Sered: Anti-Police & Prisons

Danielle Sered is featured prominently in the report, “Solutions to Violence: Creating Safety Without Prisons or Policing.” Her group, Common Justice, argues that police and prisons don’t keep people safe. The group works to “foster racial equity without relying on incarceration.” Her group doesn’t even believe more police will help stop the surge in gun violence.

In October, her group wrote, “A system that incarcerates Black children for nothing is a system that will never keep us safe. We have to reimagine public safety without police and prisons, the future of our youth depends on it.”

Danielle sered
Danielle sered

Of incarceration, Danielle Sered tweeted, “I recognize that my standard for what entitles a society to put its own people in cages is higher than average.” Of police, she tweeted, “Enforcement-focused responses to violence presume incorrectly that people involved in crime will be deterred by threat.” Her group also pushes “supervised injection sites” for drug users.

She wrote recently, “Cooperating with the police should not be a prerequisite for access to basic medical, safety, and healing resources for survivors.” On Twitter, Sered referred to Kyle Rittenhouse as “dishonest, racist, excuse-ridden, victim-blaming.” She wrote, “Jacob Blake is beginning to heal through the trauma and violence he endured at the hands of police,” even though a District Attorney later cleared the officer.

In June, she wrote, “This past year we have seen a growing appetite for safety solutions that do not rely on police and prisons. As we see a painful increase in gun violence nationwide, it is critical we do not turn backward. We have to double down on the solutions that will keep people alive.”

On January 5, Danielle Sered tweeted that she wasn’t in favor even of the “social services PLUS incarceration approach to gun violence…it fails to account for the ways incarceration GENERATES violence. It’s like having a water PLUS lighter fluid approach to fire.”

“Danielle thinks some people who are concerned that defunding the police will lead to a rise in violence fundamentally misunderstand what most policing does: a recent study
found that an average of 4 percent of police time was spent addressing violent crime,” read a report by her organization.

In Danielle’s view, “This vision of safety, to be fully realized, includes and requires the
redistribution of resources from the criminal penal methods to more productive, reliable
measures of producing safety: investments in health care, in education, in housing, in living wages, in violence interrupters and intergenerational interventions that draw on the moral authority of those most respected by their neighbors, in conflict resolution and restorative and transformative justice, and in a social service infrastructure and safety net that “in time will render enforcement not just less dominant, but obsolete.”


The Chief Judge & Deputy Chief Judge Respond

We asked Chief Judge Mary Triggiano and Judge Carl Ashley how the conference is funded. They said it was funded by a MacArthur Safety & Justice Challenge Grant. They estimated the cost would be “anywhere from $1,150-$2,500 including Sered, movie panelists, movie screening fee.” There is not public money involved. Sered is being paid between $500-$1,500.

We asked, “Who chose her and why?”

The answer: “The Race Equity and Procedural Justice Committee – a multi-stakeholder, criminal justice group- has put on conferences over the past 7 years touching on a variety of topics. The committee tries to have a variety of individuals present with differing viewpoints to spark dialogue. The conversation engendered has been broad, deep and, at times, contentious. Ms. Sered spoke at Turner Hall and a committee member suggested that she present.”

We asked, “She’s a big advocate of opposing incarceration even for violent crimes. Is that the right message to send judges and prosecutors in an era of historic crime highs? Why?”

They wrote: “As a survivor of violence, Ms. Sered is a proponent of restorative justice and that any response to violence should adhere to four core principles: our responses should be survivor-centered, accountability-based, safety-driven, and racially equitable. This is what peaked the committee’s interest in her. The conference also will feature the movie, ‘When Claude Got Shot’ about a shooting victim from an attempted carjacking in Milwaukee and his medical, financial and emotional struggles.”

We looked up “When Claude Got Shot.”

“Persisting through multiple surgeries, catastrophic health care bills, and the lingering emotional aftermath of that traumatic night, Claude finds himself torn between punishment for Nathan and the injustice of mass incarceration for Black men and boys. For Claude, the path to recovery ultimately leads to forgiveness. But that path proves to be a fraught one, paved with all the complexities that race, violence, justice, and healthcare can possibly present,” the filmmakers’ website explains.


Judge Carl Ashley Email

Subject: RE: Reminder of Our Race, Equity and Procedural Justice Conference on Friday, April 8, 2022

Good morning Colleagues,

Our Race, Equity and Procedural Justice Conference is scheduled for Friday, April 8th at the Milwaukee Library’s Centennial Hall, 733 N. Eighth Street. At this time, we are planning on our conference being in-person in the morning and virtual in the afternoon. Please note that our featured presenter, Danielle Sered ( author of “Until We Reckon”) will appear virtually in the morning session as well as a panel discussion after her presentation. This will be the seventh conference since 2014. See attached PowerPoint that outlines our previous programs. If COVID for whatever reason prevents any in-person programming, we will proceed virtually.

The planning committee is keenly aware of the backlog of cases and the rise in violence in our community, but we are committed and focused on long-term solutions to criminal behavior and public safety from a racial justice perspective. Although, I sent a notice, back in November to some of you, I should have sent an additional reminder sooner. If you have a calendar on April 8th, we would ask that you consider clearing same because it impacts others who would like to attend and participate in the conference, particularly attorneys.

Here’s a tentative program schedule:

8:30 Opening (Carl)

8:35 Chief Judge Triggiano Welcome

8:40 Library Representative

8:45 to 8:55 built-in-extra time

8:55-9:00 Intro for Danielle Sered

9:00-9:45 Danielle presentation

9:45-10:30 Panel with Danielle, Secretary Kevin Carr, Reggie Moore, Arnitta Holliman & one additional panelist

10:30-10:45 Break

10:45-11:45 Panel with a victims and system involved persons

11:45-12:00 Arthur Byas Award Presentation

12:00-1:00 Lunch on your own

1:00-2:40 Intro & Movie “When Claude Got Shot” Run Time 96 minutes

2:45-3:00 Break

3:00-3:30 Talkback Panel for When Claude Got Shot

3:30-4:30 Breakout Sessions

4:30-4:45 Reconvene, Closing

Please feel free to reach out to me regarding any concerns or issues.

Thanks in advance for your support,

Carl

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wisconsin Supreme Court Redistricting Hearing Wisconsin should soon have an answer about ballot drop boxes and just who can return absentee ballots. wisconsin supreme court

Wisconsin Pro-life Groups Tell Supreme Court There’s No Right to Abortion

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s pro-life groups are unified in telling the Wisconsin Supreme Court it is not the court’s job to create a right to abortion.

Wisconsin Right to Life, Wisconsin Family Action and Pro-Life Wisconsin all filed a joint brief with the court that argues there is no right to abortion and add that if there is to be one, that decision is up to lawmakers.

“The Supreme Court is not the proper venue to create health and safety law nor the proper mechanism to add a constitutional amendment. The legislature is the proper body to weigh the policy considerations and create law, not the court,” Wisconsin Family Action president Christine File said.

“Finding a right to abortion in our state constitution, where there clearly is none, would be the most extreme form of legislating from the bench,” Dan Miller, state director at Pro-Life Wisconsin, said. “The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled in Dobbs that there is no federal constitutional right to abortion. Nothing in Wisconsin’s constitution or the history of our state would remotely suggest such a right. We implore the Wisconsin Supreme Court to reject Planned Parenthood’s radical and self-serving plans.”

Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin in February asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide if there is a right to abortion in the state.

The Supreme Court has accepted the case, and the filing from Wisconsin’s pro-life groups is in response to that case.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty also filed a brief in the case.

“There is no right to an abortion in Wisconsin’s Constitution. No judge, justice, or lawyer should be creating policy for Wisconsinites out of thin air. Reversing Roe v. Wade through the Dobbs decision rightfully placed the abortion issue back where it should have been all along – in the halls of state legislatures,” WILL Deputy Counsel Luke Berg said. “That’s where the debate and conversation must remain.”

The court is expecting responses from everyone involved in the case by today. The court has not said when it expects to hear oral arguments.

trump waukesha

President Trump Will Hold Rally in Waukesha on May 1; How to Get Tickets

President Donald J. Trump will travel to Waukesha, Wisconsin, on May 1 "to contrast the...
barry braatz

Washington County DA Candidate Barry Braatz Promises to ‘Hold Criminals Accountable,’ Gets Big Endorsement

"I will work side-by-side with law enforcement to hold criminals accountable" - Barry Braatz. Barry Braatz,...
Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...

Rep. Janel Brandtjen: Threats to WEC Chief Don’t Help

(The Center Square) – One of the biggest critics of Wisconsin’s election administrator says no one should be threatening her and says threats don’t help fix election integrity issues.

State Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, on Tuesday offered her thoughts after the Wisconsin Elections Commission confirmed elections administrator Meagan Wolfe is receiving extra security protection.

"Threatening Administrator Meagan Wolfe, or any election official, is unacceptable and counterproductive. Venting frustrations on individuals like Wolfe, clerks, or poll workers is not only illegal but also harmful to rebuilding trust in our elections,” Brandtjen said. “Threats only undermine our republic and empower the courts and media. It's essential to address any concerns about election processes through legal channels. Threats have no place in our democracy.”

Brandtjen has been one of Wisconsin’s loudest critics of Wolfe. She led hearings as far back as 2021 into Wolfe’s role in the 2020 election. Brandtjen also led the push to get Wolfe removed from the Elections Commission.

“Wolfe’s term has indeed expired, and according to Wisconsin Statutes 15.61(1)(b)1, she should be removed, but Republicans are too worried about the press or too compromised to follow existing law.” Brandtjen said.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Monday clarified that Wolfe is receiving extra security but refused to offer any details.

“The Wisconsin Elections Commission has had productive conversations about safety and security with state leadership, including the governor’s office, which is tasked with approving security measures for state government officials,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind said in a statement. “Those conversations have resulted in additional security measures being approved for Administrator Wolfe and the WEC when the need arises.”

Brandtjen on Tuesday blamed Wisconsin Republicans, and once again blamed Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, for Wolfe’s continued time on the Elections Commission.

“It's disappointing that Sen. Dan Knodl and Rep. Scott Krug, chairs of the election committees, have not exercised their investigative and subpoena powers. This inaction has allowed the neglect of essential laws, such as providing ballots to individuals declared incompetent, lack of checks in military ballot requests, an insecure online system, and improper guidance on voting for homeless individuals without proper documentation,” she said. “The Legislature, particularly Speaker Vos' control, is responsible for the frustration caused by election irregularities due to their inaction.”

Wisconsin’s local election managers have reported an uptick in threats and angry rhetoric since the 2020 election, and some local election offices have taken extra precautions. But there haven’t been any cases in Wisconsin where someone has acted on an election threat.

Wisconsin’s Largest Business Group Sues Over Evers’ 400-year School Funding Veto

(The Center Square) – There is now a legal challenge to Gov. Tony Evers’ 400-year school funding veto.

The WMC Litigation Center on Monday asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take up their challenge to the governor’s summer veto that increased per-pupil funding for the next four centuries.

“At issue is Gov. Evers’ use of the so-called ‘Vanna White’ or ‘pick-a-letter’ veto,” the group said in a statement. “The governor creatively eliminated specific numbers in a portion of the budget bill that was meant to increase the property tax levy limit for school districts in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 fiscal years. By striking individual digits, the levy limit would instead be increased from the years 2023 to 2425 – or four centuries into the future.”

The WMC Litigation Center is an affiliate of Wisconsin Manufactures & Commerce (WMC), the combined state chamber and manufacturers’ association.

Litigation Center Executive Director Scott Rosenow said while Wisconsin’s governor has an incredibly powerful veto pen, there are limits.

“No Wisconsin governor has the authority to strike individual letters or digits to form a new word or number, except when reducing appropriations,” Rosenow said. “This action is not only unconstitutional on its face, but it is undemocratic because this specific partial veto allows school districts to raise property taxes for the next 400 years without voter approval.”

Wisconsin lawmakers and voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1990 that put limits on the governor’s veto power.

Rosenow and the WMC Litigation Center say the governor’s veto goes beyond those limits.

The legal challenge also raises the constitutional issue that all state spending has to originate with, and be approved by, the legislature.

“In no uncertain terms, 402 years is not less than or part of the two-year duration approved by the Legislature – it is far more,” concluded Rosenow. “The governor overstepped his authority with this partial veto, at the expense of taxpayers, and we believe oversight by the Court is necessary.”

The WMC Litigation Center is asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case as quickly as possible.

Let’s Thank Rep. August, Sen. Wimberger, & WI Voters For Ending Zuckerbucks

Remember when Elon Musk challenged Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match? That fight between Twitter/Threads billionaires...