Wednesday, April 24, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Gov. Evers & Kenosha Leaders: You Failed Us [OPINION]

spot_img

On the eve of President Trump visiting Kenosha to meet with law enforcement and survey damage after riots tore Kenosha apart, Wisconsin Gov. Evers had the stones to write a letter to the President asking him to reconsider visiting. We find this appalling.

In a letter obtained by the The Associated Press, Evers stated, “I, along with other community leaders who have reached out, are concerned about what your presence will mean for Kenosha and our state,” and “I am concerned your presence will only hinder our healing. I am concerned your presence will only delay our work to overcome division and move forward together.”

Of course Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, who has been all but absent during the riots, tweeted: “President Trump should rethink his plans and give Kenosha residents space to heal.”

Wisconsin Right Now was in Kenosha several days last week. We witnessed day after day of abhorrent leadership by Gov. Evers and Kenosha leaders. Day after day, law enforcement pushed protestors and counter protesters, many armed, out of Civic Center Park and into the neighborhoods and business district, where they were then allowed free rein to get in clashes, vandalize and burn without any push back. This failed strategy led to the mass fires, destruction and fatal shootings. Those responsible need to own their disastrous response to the violence and criminal activity that erupted in that city. The Kenosha anarchy response is a textbook case of what not to do in such a situation. Officials handed over their city to criminal lawbreakers. The failure to immediately accept federal aid created a scenario that made it impossible for the rank-and-file officers to stop the mayhem. As a result, the citizens and businesses of Kenosha suffered great losses.

It’s not just us saying this. It’s business owners and residents of all races – like David Prill and Corvette Thompson – who told us they felt government pushed rioters into their neighborhoods and then abandoned them and left them to fend for themselves. As rioters burned the building across the street and then tried to smash the door of his used car business, Prill, who called police to no avail, was left to fend criminals off himself.

“Everyone was up at the park up there protesting and then the police tear gassed everybody, which I don’t think that was a great idea at all,” said Prill. “All that did was flush everybody over here to the businesses. All these people flood us after being tear gassed and pepper sprayed and now they’re already agitated…The cops stayed back there. They just let them come all the way up here. They didn’t stop them, and they ran through, and everywhere they ran through, they messed up…The police watched it happen. They had squads going up and down the road. They saw it going on.”

“Why are you going to push that into my front yard? I have my kids up here. Why are you also going to push them into a residential area?” asked Thompson.


Gov. Evers, Kenosha Leaders: The Perfect Storm of Failure

Evers kenosha
Credit: jim piwowarczyk

We hold Gov. Evers responsible for setting the stage when he made the initial premature statement about the Kenosha police shooting of Jacob Blake, which is still under investigation: “While we do not have all of the details yet, what we know for certain is that he is not the first Black man or person to have been shot or injured or mercilessly killed at the hands of individuals in law enforcement in our state or our country.”

According to JSOnline: White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows stated Evers turned down an offer of federal help from President Donald Trump. However, Evers spokeswoman Britt Cudaback stated, “The governor informed them that we would be increasing Wisconsin National Guard support in Kenosha and therefore would not need federal assistance in response to protests but would welcome additional federal support and resources for our state’s response to COVID-19,”

There were miscommunications and delayed requests for help. According to JSOnline: Sheriff David “Beth said on Sunday night, there was a miscommunication between Kenosha County officials over who requested assistance from Evers and it turned out no one had. Since then, he said, he’s been working with the National Guard’s leader on getting more troops.”

After the fatal shooting late Wednesday night,  Governor Evers finally accepted help from President Trump. We saw the immediate response of federal officers the next day. Arrests were made and riots were squashed before they could begin. Peace was brought back to the streets overnight. The more aggressive, but arguably less visible, law enforcement intervention paid off. People congregated in the park again, and they marched down the street, but they did so peacefully, which is an American right we wholeheartedly support.

 

Evers kenosha
Credit: jim piwowarczyk

 

We spoke to several businesses owners last week. No one from the City of Kenosha or the State of Wisconsin has been in contact with them. Federal authorities did make contact with at least one business owner we are aware of to obtain evidence of the riots.

We witnessed the utter failure of government to get a handle on the disorder for days. We think people should be held responsible for it. They include the governor, mayor, sheriff – whoever was responsible for making law enforcement stand down in the face of anarchy.

To be clear, we are not blaming the rank-and-file law enforcement officers. They performed valiantly in exceptionally tough circumstances, standing in riot gear for hours as they were called names and pelted with fireworks and bottles. We’re blaming the people who created the strategy. Or non-strategy as it appeared. They were made to essentially stand down.

 

Evers kenosha
Credit: jim piwowarczyk

 

As a result, desperate citizens took things into their own hands. We witnessed a subdivision entrance being guarded by heavily armed citizens who erected a barricade to protect it. We witnessed a gas station being guarded by heavily armed people for the same reason. We saw a car dealership being guarded by people in similar fashion. We watched the video of an elderly businessman trying in vain to protect his burning business with a fire extinguisher all by himself, only to get beaten for it. Stating the obvious, but people should be able to rely on government to protect them, and they couldn’t in Kenosha. That’s completely unacceptable. Of course, a 17-year-old from Illinois, Kyle Rittenhouse, then came armed to defend person and property, and two people lost their lives in two shootings on the streets (prosecutors have charged him with criminal homicide; his lawyers say he was using self defense in the face of a vicious mob attack).

Beth said, in a Aug. 26 press conference, that, on the first day after the Jacob Blake shooting, rocks were thrown at officers, and a police officer was hit in the head. On Monday, he said the numbers of people grew, so Kenosha put out an all-call request from the state to other law enforcement agencies, and he says they showed up in the hundreds. On Monday, “we thought we put it out to the National Guard but we had our wires crossed… we didn’t actually request the National Guard the first night because we had our wires crossed,” he said. On Tuesday, they put up a fence around the courthouse, which he called a “focal point.” He said there were a “few hundred” National Guard in Kenosha. He said officers “tried to get people to leave” and then “many were taken into custody,” some for curfew violations.

All of that rhetoric sounds great on TV, except for the inexcusable bumbling failure to call the Guard in, but it doesn’t match what we saw on the streets or the ultimate destruction that occurred.

Evers kenosha
Credit: jim piwowarczyk

Government officials let Kenosha burn. Literally. You can watch our live stream from Tuesday night below and see for yourself. Business were burned down with impunity. Windows were smashed and cars destroyed. Graffiti was everywhere, including writing blatantly saying “kill cops.”

One Washington Post reporter we spoke to equated the unfolding scene to the movie, The Purge. He was shocked by the government response, and he said it’s done a lot differently – and better – in Chicago, where law enforcement marches alongside people and keeps general order (although what happened at the Magnificent Mile recently wasn’t very orderly.)

In Kenosha, we walked down darkened downtown streets where people were openly engaged in criminal vandalism with no law enforcement presence to try to stop or deter them. We saw people smashing windows and burning down a credit union. We lost count of the damaged and destroyed cars. Businesses boarded up and closed shop.

However, we saw no National Guard troops in the area with the greatest destruction; if they were there, they certainly weren’t visible. Where is the Guard? we kept asking (we did see a contingent Saturday. Too late.) We saw a completely inert law enforcement response. We saw violent anarchists allowed to destroy a city’s downtown, to wreck people’s businesses and livelihoods, without push back. We thought of Portland. We thought of Seattle. Downtown Kenosha was for all practical purposes an anarchist police-free zone. The only officers we saw other than those lined up at the courthouse were protecting fire scenes so the Fire Department could safely put out blazes or were driving by quickly in their squad cars.


The Kenosha Anarchy Was Visible for All to See

The mayor, John Antaramian, said on Wednesday, Aug. 26 that the city made a request “to the state for support and Gov. Evers granted for the Guard to come in…to deal with the looting and violence that had occurred. We have called for a curfew. That curfew is there to protect the public. We need to make sure people are off the streets.”

However, the new approach didn’t work.

The government’s tactics changed that night but were also disastrous. This time, people still milled in the park across from the courthouse in open violation of curfew, but we could see many openly carrying firearms – on both sides. Counter protesters, who showed up because they were upset that government allowed the city to basically burn, mixed with protesters. It was a volatile situation. Protesters threw fireworks and bottles at officers who, again, were lined up in front of the courthouse.

The curfew was a joke. We saw zero enforcement of the curfew. Some side streets were blocked off, basically funneling people downtown in the blocks around the courthouse areas. The freeway exits were blocked all the way to Illinois. That part was smart, but people just drove around that and found a way in anyhow.

It might have just petered out. Instead, law enforcement began pushing people back and out of the park, using military style vehicles and pepper spray.

https://www.facebook.com/jessica.mcbride100/videos/348294299687534/

This pushed the increasingly volatile crowd into city and side streets, disbursing them but doing nothing to deter the growing lawlessness or to make them go home. This disastrously culminated in volatile clashes between different groups, both heavily armed, and, ultimately, Rittenhouse shot three people, killing two of them, while being chased and attacked.

On the third day, the day after the shooting, government finally got it right. President Donald Trump announced he was sending federal law enforcement into the city, Governor Evers didn’t try to stop it, and we saw them there. The tactics had changed. The cops in riot gear were no longer lined up in front of the courthouse (a fence protected that). Instead, we saw teams of federal and local officers riding around in unmarked vehicles and stopping people they thought constituted a threat. We saw them take a person with a broken stop sign into custody. They arrested 9 people in a bus and bread truck from out-of-state who police say had vehicles filled with suspicious items, like fireworks, and were getting fuel. Is that why there were no arson fires that night?

https://www.facebook.com/jessica.mcbride100/videos/1716928851788275/

Shame on Gov. Evers, Kenosha Leaders and Lt. Gov. Barnes for their abysmal leadership during this crisis which was focused more on scoring cheap political points than public safety. It is our hope the citizens of Kenosha and Wisconsin show their anger at the response at upcoming elections and throw these people out of office.

Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...

Rep. Janel Brandtjen: Threats to WEC Chief Don’t Help

(The Center Square) – One of the biggest critics of Wisconsin’s election administrator says no one should be threatening her and says threats don’t help fix election integrity issues.

State Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, on Tuesday offered her thoughts after the Wisconsin Elections Commission confirmed elections administrator Meagan Wolfe is receiving extra security protection.

"Threatening Administrator Meagan Wolfe, or any election official, is unacceptable and counterproductive. Venting frustrations on individuals like Wolfe, clerks, or poll workers is not only illegal but also harmful to rebuilding trust in our elections,” Brandtjen said. “Threats only undermine our republic and empower the courts and media. It's essential to address any concerns about election processes through legal channels. Threats have no place in our democracy.”

Brandtjen has been one of Wisconsin’s loudest critics of Wolfe. She led hearings as far back as 2021 into Wolfe’s role in the 2020 election. Brandtjen also led the push to get Wolfe removed from the Elections Commission.

“Wolfe’s term has indeed expired, and according to Wisconsin Statutes 15.61(1)(b)1, she should be removed, but Republicans are too worried about the press or too compromised to follow existing law.” Brandtjen said.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Monday clarified that Wolfe is receiving extra security but refused to offer any details.

“The Wisconsin Elections Commission has had productive conversations about safety and security with state leadership, including the governor’s office, which is tasked with approving security measures for state government officials,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind said in a statement. “Those conversations have resulted in additional security measures being approved for Administrator Wolfe and the WEC when the need arises.”

Brandtjen on Tuesday blamed Wisconsin Republicans, and once again blamed Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, for Wolfe’s continued time on the Elections Commission.

“It's disappointing that Sen. Dan Knodl and Rep. Scott Krug, chairs of the election committees, have not exercised their investigative and subpoena powers. This inaction has allowed the neglect of essential laws, such as providing ballots to individuals declared incompetent, lack of checks in military ballot requests, an insecure online system, and improper guidance on voting for homeless individuals without proper documentation,” she said. “The Legislature, particularly Speaker Vos' control, is responsible for the frustration caused by election irregularities due to their inaction.”

Wisconsin’s local election managers have reported an uptick in threats and angry rhetoric since the 2020 election, and some local election offices have taken extra precautions. But there haven’t been any cases in Wisconsin where someone has acted on an election threat.

Wisconsin’s Largest Business Group Sues Over Evers’ 400-year School Funding Veto

(The Center Square) – There is now a legal challenge to Gov. Tony Evers’ 400-year school funding veto.

The WMC Litigation Center on Monday asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take up their challenge to the governor’s summer veto that increased per-pupil funding for the next four centuries.

“At issue is Gov. Evers’ use of the so-called ‘Vanna White’ or ‘pick-a-letter’ veto,” the group said in a statement. “The governor creatively eliminated specific numbers in a portion of the budget bill that was meant to increase the property tax levy limit for school districts in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 fiscal years. By striking individual digits, the levy limit would instead be increased from the years 2023 to 2425 – or four centuries into the future.”

The WMC Litigation Center is an affiliate of Wisconsin Manufactures & Commerce (WMC), the combined state chamber and manufacturers’ association.

Litigation Center Executive Director Scott Rosenow said while Wisconsin’s governor has an incredibly powerful veto pen, there are limits.

“No Wisconsin governor has the authority to strike individual letters or digits to form a new word or number, except when reducing appropriations,” Rosenow said. “This action is not only unconstitutional on its face, but it is undemocratic because this specific partial veto allows school districts to raise property taxes for the next 400 years without voter approval.”

Wisconsin lawmakers and voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1990 that put limits on the governor’s veto power.

Rosenow and the WMC Litigation Center say the governor’s veto goes beyond those limits.

The legal challenge also raises the constitutional issue that all state spending has to originate with, and be approved by, the legislature.

“In no uncertain terms, 402 years is not less than or part of the two-year duration approved by the Legislature – it is far more,” concluded Rosenow. “The governor overstepped his authority with this partial veto, at the expense of taxpayers, and we believe oversight by the Court is necessary.”

The WMC Litigation Center is asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case as quickly as possible.

Let’s Thank Rep. August, Sen. Wimberger, & WI Voters For Ending Zuckerbucks

Remember when Elon Musk challenged Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match? That fight between Twitter/Threads billionaires...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

‘Scam Trial’: Trump Slams Judge, Says He May Not Let Him Go to Son’s Graduation, Campaign

"This is about election interference; that’s all it’s about" - former President Donald Trump. Former President...
Tammy Baldwin's History

Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin’s History of Going Soft on Iran Draws Renewed Scrunity

In 2012, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, then a U.S....
Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

WILL Says State Agency Acted ‘Unlawfully’ Against Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

"State agency acting unlawfully, enforcing illegally adopted policy to his detriment and potentially hundreds of...