Sunday, April 28, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Sunday, April 28, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Franklin City Meeting on the Rock Gets Testy Fast [VIDEO]

spot_img

At times, the meeting grew testy. However, speakers also stressed a need to improve communication going forward.

Neighbors and aldermen raised questions about a proposed “memorandum of understanding” between the City of Franklin and the Rock sports and entertainment complex at a Tuesday Common Council meeting, with several residents expressing concern about a provision that includes a near-blanket assurance granting future permits for special events at the Rock without any specific new decibel-limit being reached.

“I’m here as one of the seniors in this city…You people aren’t taking good care of us. I’m 95 years old, and I don’t like putting up with some of this stuff,” an affected neighbor, Le Roy Lewandowski, told city officials. “Please, we have to do something. I feel like I’m in a city that I don’t have the power to do anything.” He said the Rock’s developer, Mike Zimmerman, is a friend of his.

Lewandowski said the recent noise scared a 90-year-old woman who lives next to him.

Neighbors are especially upset that Franklin’s earlier agreement with the Rock set the allowed decibel levels much higher (79) than the regular city noise ordinance allows.

The Rock was represented at the meeting by Zimmerman and Milwaukee County Supervisor Steve Taylor, who works for the Rock. Zimmerman said the provision on permits was important to the Rock. “If we are going to negotiate with the city in good faith, what we do ask for is terms that allow for us to run our business,” he said.

Alderman Mike Barber said he wanted to mitigate the adversarial roles. “We still have to have methods to protect our citizens and that is something that I as an alderman would not want to give up,” he told Zimmerman.

Mike barber
Ald. Mike barber

However, despite the at times-collaborative language, tensions still flared, especially when Zimmerman and Taylor first spoke to the Council after a lengthy and emotional public comment session. Several speakers claimed Franklin is getting a black eye on talk radio because the sound issues haven’t been fixed.

Taylor called a citizen, Orville Seymer, a “goof” during one exchange, and Zimmerman got into a brief heated exchange with a neighbor in the audience when Zimmerman sarcastically referred to the man’s wife by her first name, Joy, while saying some of his critics were ignorant. Watch:

The Rock’s representatives and city officials stressed the MOU was a work in progress, not a final document. The document represents an attempt by the city to resolve neighbors’ long-standing noise concerns, which they say are destroying their quality of life.

The controversial passage on extraordinary events in the MOU says,

“Extraordinary Events. The City of Franklin agrees to support the entertainment efforts of Ballpark Commons for extraordinary events such as concerts, fireworks, and seasonal events (Hill Has Eyes, Enchant). The City of Franklin will not withhold permits and approvals unless there are direct violations of sound ordinance and/or reasonable compliance concerns with city departments (fire, police, health, etc.) and municipal codes as outlined in the new PDD (city agreement with the Rock).”

That concerns some neighbors, who think it means the city will lose all leverage.

Neighbors have contended that the city’s development agreement and practices have made it impossible for the Rock to have violations. The decibel level set in the city’s development agreement with the Rock (called the PDD) is 79, much higher than Franklin’s regular noise ordinance allows and other guidelines. Furthermore, a violation is not counted unless it occurs for 30 minutes straight. Many neighbors said the 79 decibel limit, and how it came to be, is the crux of the problem.

The MOU does not specify a new decibel level. Instead, it says, “Following execution of this MOU, the parties agree to begin negotiations on a new decibel level agreement by type of event. Specifically, the parties agree to adjust volumes to comply with 3 different thresholds for Milkmen games (based on attendance and/or day of the week), extraordinary events, and fireworks.”

Andy Kleist, of Franklin, said the MOU “does little to mitigate the noise issues.” He said the Umbrella Bar should be included in speaker adjustments.

The section for extraordinary events is “an entitlement for the Rock and should be removed. It does not benefit the neighbors in any way,” he said.

“There is consistently no consideration for the impact on families,” he said, calling the city’s behavior “unacceptable and negligent.”

The full MOU can be read here.

Aldermen React

“I think it’s a beginning step,” said Alderman Mike Barber, of the MOU, but he said it lacked details. “I don’t understand the monitoring,” he said, adding that he also doesn’t understand some of the decibel levels in the MOU. “I think it’s a first step.” He said he wanted a more open process involving citizens and other aldermen.

Alderwoman Michelle Eichmann spoke in glowing terms about the Rock.

“What would Franklin be without the Rock?” Eichmann said, adding that the document was a good start. The Rock is a complex that hosts a summer concert series, fireworks, a Halloween event, Milkmen baseball games, a rap concert, a taco and tequila event, and more. It is located adjacent to residential neighborhoods on an old landfill site.

Franklin emergency meeting emergency franklin meeting steve taylor franklin
Steve taylor, john nelson, and the rock neighbors in franklin.

Alderwoman Courtney Day said the MOU was a good document to start with, but she raised concerns about reopening the entire PDD. Turning the speakers in and down should help a lot, she said. Day was also concerned about the section in the agreement promising permits for special events.

Mayor John Nelson said the MOU is a “working document” that will include additional input.

Alderman Ed Holpfer said there are things in the MOU that are “not acceptable.”

Zimmerman said he believed the agreement (called the PDD) needed to be opened up.

Tempers Flare

Taylor addressed conflict-of-interest concerns at the meeting, sitting next to Zimmerman at the table facing aldermen.

At the meeting, Supervisor Taylor read from a letter he sent on May 13, 2022, to the County disclosing the conflict of interest with the Rock, saying that he would “not be voting or participating in any debate on Rock-related items and would abstain” on any votes before the County Board or subcommittees involving the Rock.

“I have distanced myself. Why? Because of where I work,” Taylor said. He called citizen Orville Seymer a “goof” after Seymer said from the audience that he has four open records requests pending against Taylor.

“That’s the whole conflict of interest that talk radio and bloggers want to write about and that’s fine. But keep on digging because there’s nothing there and I know the difference,” Taylor said, referring to his dual role as a county supervisor and Rock employee. The County also has a separate development agreement with the Rock, and some county supervisors have said they want to explore whether the county can take legal action due to the noise concerns.

Zimmerman labeled the perception that the Rock “hasn’t done anything” “complete ignorance.” When people made retorts from the audience, he said, “It’s the definition of ignorance. So we’re going to review the facts, Joy.” It appears he was referring to one of the neighbors who spoke earlier in the meeting.

“That’s my wife,” a man from the audience retorted. “Don’t talk to my wife like that.”

The mayor interjected, “Well, if we have to, we’ve got the Police department… It’s order.”

“I called her, her name, mayor. Apparently he’s insulted by that,” Zimmerman said. “Oh, it’s the tone? Got it.”

At other points, Zimmerman said he wanted to work with the city, but he repeatedly called it a “negotiation.”

“We also sit here and are willing to change things,” Zimmerman said. He said the MOU was the result of “those negotiations.”

However, he also said: “We by no means, if you guys don’t want to sign this. We have an agreement. We’re comfortable where we’re at.”

The mayor said the MOU would require the city to take over sound monitors and place the results online so people can see “in real time where it’s at.”

The 79 Decibel Limit

Neighbors and a county supervisor singled out the 79-decibel limit in the city’s agreement with the Rock as the main problem, saying that the county never approved that level, and it’s much higher than the regular Franklin noise ordinance.

Milwaukee County Supervisor Patti Logsdon said she wanted to “set the record straight” on the 79-decibel limit that was set by the city for the Rock.

Patti logsdon
Supervisor patti logsdon

She said the county development agreement never suggested a sound limit. “We did not set this,” she said. The actual Franklin noise ordinance is supposed to be 55 decibels in the day and 45 at night, and she said that a separate Franklin ordinance that mentions 79 decibels is by permit only and is “for things like fireworks. We don’t expect noise levels like that in a residential area.”

Joy Draginis-Zingales of Greendale – the woman mentioned by Zimmerman – said she was asked to be a voice for her subdivision. “79 decibels was never approved at the county…the county doesn’t have the right to do that.” She said the agreement needed to involve everyone coming to the table.

Dana Gindt of Franklin also said it was “incorrect to say the county approved 79 decibels.” She said this was used as justification for the number to be placed in the city PDD, but that justification was false.

“For the last 10 years, it has been nothing but chaos. Loud music for no reason,” neighbor John Czaskos, 80, said. He has lived in the area for 40 years.

Zimmerman stated that, within the city development agreement, the Rock is allowed to go up 79 decibels. He said the Rock has made changes over the years, including installing light shields, LED lights, and the installation of sound monitors, as well as a reduction of nights for the Halloween event (a $200,000 county sound study found that most of the monitors were inoperable).

Neighbors and a county supervisor urged the city to follow its noise ordinance that requires a 50-decibel limit, with 45 decibels at night.

Name Calling Criticized

Dale Kirner, of Franklin, told city officials that his name is “not terrorist. It’s not NIMBY. It’s not *ucker. I’m not a Karen.” He was referring to a recent Wisconsin Right Now story that revealed the names some neighbors and county supervisors were called during a closed meeting between the mayor, director of administration, a city alderman, the developer Mike Zimmerman, and Milwaukee County Supervisor Steve Taylor, who works for the Rock’s foundation. They came up with the proposed MOU at that meeting.

He said the press coverage has helped the neighbors. He also thanked Alderman Jason Craig.

“If you don’t think the city of Franklin is being laughed at right now, you’re not listening to morning talk shows,” Kirner said. With the help of the publicity, “This is coming to light. We’re not bad people. We help each other out,” Kirner said.

Neighbor Debbie Davis said she appreciated officials’ integrity and felt the MOU was created with good intent, but she said active directives should be used instead.

Donnella McAdams, of Franklin, said, “This noise intrusion has been allowed for 10 years for hundreds of events with amplified noise extending for two miles.” She said the recent $200,000 sound study confirmed what neighbors have been saying for years.

Citizen Rich Busalacchi read passages of Wisconsin Right Now’s article on the emergency meeting and said to the mayor, John Nelson, “Your administration, you and some of the common council members are bought and paid for by Rock and Mike Zimmerman.”

“That’s ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous,” the mayor responded, saying Busalacchi was making “public lies.”

Busalacchi said he was concerned about the vagueness of the MOU. He said there have been 10 years of “unfulfilled promises.” He said the MOU makes the City of Franklin an “arm of the Rock,” and a “company town.”

Zimmerman trashed Busalacchi for his “hate speech,” accusing him of “non-facts.”

Busalacchi retorted to the mayor, “You could not even defend your residents in the closed meeting. Franklin is now the laughingstock of local communities.” He said Franklin should “get rid of the MOU and the Trojan horse agreements.”

Neighbors Unload About the Rock Noise Issues

Claire Vitchick, of Franklin, declared, “I’m so disgusted with the city, I can’t believe it. I pay for police that don’t come. What kind of city is this? It’s a joke.”

For his part, Orville Seymer told the Common Council that Milwaukee County Supervisor Steve Taylor “is the problem in this. He has a long history of vindictive, retaliatory behavior.” He asked Zimmerman to “rein in Steve Taylor.”

He said Franklin officials were getting beat up badly on talk radio over the Rock issue.

Steven Green, of Franklin, said the MOU marks an opportunity to move forward. “The Rock is good for Franklin. The people who live there deserve to be happy.” He said people “have to work together.”

He asked the Common Council and developer Mike Zimmerman to show neighbors “mercy.”

Supervisor Kathleen Vincent, who represents Greendale, told Franklin aldermen that she was “asking you to consider the lives being impacted by the sound.”

She said that county supervisors should be included in meetings about the Rock and asked for “transparency” in meetings.

Andy Pelkey, of Franklin, said he was glad that “some progress is being made” but chastised the City of Franklin for ignoring the problem over the years, “letting it fester for years and years and years like this issue has.”

“The city has a history of ignoring the facts,” he said.

He noted of an item in the proposed MOU to move speakers so they don’t point at the neighborhood, “Why wasn’t this already being done?”

Tom Kowalski, of Franklin, said that the MOU “talks about good faith,” but that he doesn’t trust that anything is in good faith anymore.

He criticized Franklin’s practice whereby a sound violation is not registered unless it’s gone on for 30 minutes straight. “A single break in the song will get them off,” Kowalski said.

“Are we giving away the farm on this?” he asked.

Neighbor Bob Knoll said the Rock is a “fantastic development” but raised concerns about a proposed sound fence’s location. His wife, Naomi Knoll, also raised concerns about the Umbrella bar and sound fence working.

 

sen tammy baldwin

Sen. Tammy Baldwin Slips ‘Through the Back Door’ During UW-Green Bay Student Protest: Report

U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, under growing fire from the left, slipped out of a room...
solar energy

Destroying Your Ability to Finance Solar [Up Against the Wall]

The PSC is now considering the issue of net metering, which is when electric utilities...
trump vs biden

Trump Leads Biden by SIX PERCENT in New CNN Poll, Pulls Ahead With Women

Trump vs. Biden: The widening lead comes as Democrats are trying to jail the Republican...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Redistricting Hearing Wisconsin should soon have an answer about ballot drop boxes and just who can return absentee ballots. wisconsin supreme court

Wisconsin Pro-life Groups Tell Supreme Court There’s No Right to Abortion

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s pro-life groups are unified in telling the Wisconsin Supreme Court it is not the court’s job to create a right to abortion.

Wisconsin Right to Life, Wisconsin Family Action and Pro-Life Wisconsin all filed a joint brief with the court that argues there is no right to abortion and add that if there is to be one, that decision is up to lawmakers.

“The Supreme Court is not the proper venue to create health and safety law nor the proper mechanism to add a constitutional amendment. The legislature is the proper body to weigh the policy considerations and create law, not the court,” Wisconsin Family Action president Christine File said.

“Finding a right to abortion in our state constitution, where there clearly is none, would be the most extreme form of legislating from the bench,” Dan Miller, state director at Pro-Life Wisconsin, said. “The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled in Dobbs that there is no federal constitutional right to abortion. Nothing in Wisconsin’s constitution or the history of our state would remotely suggest such a right. We implore the Wisconsin Supreme Court to reject Planned Parenthood’s radical and self-serving plans.”

Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin in February asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide if there is a right to abortion in the state.

The Supreme Court has accepted the case, and the filing from Wisconsin’s pro-life groups is in response to that case.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty also filed a brief in the case.

“There is no right to an abortion in Wisconsin’s Constitution. No judge, justice, or lawyer should be creating policy for Wisconsinites out of thin air. Reversing Roe v. Wade through the Dobbs decision rightfully placed the abortion issue back where it should have been all along – in the halls of state legislatures,” WILL Deputy Counsel Luke Berg said. “That’s where the debate and conversation must remain.”

The court is expecting responses from everyone involved in the case by today. The court has not said when it expects to hear oral arguments.

trump waukesha

President Trump Will Hold Rally in Waukesha on May 1; How to Get Tickets

President Donald J. Trump will travel to Waukesha, Wisconsin, on May 1 "to contrast the...
barry braatz

Washington County DA Candidate Barry Braatz Promises to ‘Hold Criminals Accountable,’ Gets Big Endorsement

"I will work side-by-side with law enforcement to hold criminals accountable" - Barry Braatz. Barry Braatz,...
Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...