Wednesday, May 22, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Wednesday, May 22, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

“Beholden to a Mob”: Waukesha School Board Reverses Direction, Cites Horrific Threats

spot_img

“Vitriol, insults, and trying to destroy our businesses,” “unfathomable. I was told to put a bullet in my head. I was told children would die, and students would starve. It’s unacceptable.” – Corey Montiho, school board member describing threats he received.

Folding to aggressive threats and bullying from a national “mob” driven by politics and misleading news coverage, the Waukesha School Board reversed direction by rescinding its decision on free school lunches, some board members said in a heated special meeting on Aug. 30.

The 5-4 vote came after an emotional discussion in which school board members in opposition to rescinding the vote described receiving threats, with one board member saying people’s businesses were imperiled, and he was told to “put a bullet in my head.” Board members described their children’s pictures being posted online. Several board members said the board would be caving to a bullying mob if it changed its earlier decision, but that’s just what happened.

In June, the board voted unanimously to abandon a federal program that gives universal free lunches to all students regardless of income. The board switched back to a program, used before the pandemic, that gives free and reduced lunches only to children whose parents meet income guidelines.

Waukesha School Board Reverses Direction

On August 30, though, in the face of a weekend of threats that resulted in police intervention and harm to board members’ businesses, a majority of the board rescinded its earlier vote, and it will now give free lunch to all students, even if their parents are wealthy. The lunches are provided to all under age 18 even if they aren’t enrolled in Waukesha schools.

The board members who caved are Amanda Roddy, Greg Deets, Bill Baumgart, Patrick McCaffery, and Joseph Como Jr. Some board members who caved said that the federal income guidelines can leave out some children whose parents have “situational” poverty due to the pandemic or who don’t apply for reduced or free lunches because of the stigma.

The board members who voted against rescinding the board’s earlier decision were Corey Montiho, Kelly Piacsek, Karin Rajnicek, and Anthony Zenobia. All four board members detailed the barrage of threats they received and implored the board not to give in to the pressure. Some said they believed caving to the progressive mob would be a slippery slope leading to similar pressure on things like mask-wearing and critical race theory.


The Threats: ‘Unfathomable,’ ‘Unacceptable’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCWx8pwqXLw

Corey Montiho, a school board member, described “vitriol, insults, and trying to destroy our businesses.” He said it was “unfathomable. I was told to put a bullet in my head. I was told children would die, and students would starve. It’s unacceptable.” He also slammed attacks made by members of the public against Darren Clark, assistant superintendent for Business Services, saying Clark “is an unbelievable asset to this district. Part of his job in committees is to raise the other side of issues.” He suggested that people concerned about feeding kids could donate money to pay off kids’ negative balances.

“This motion is being presented to the board to act on because of intimidation and threats that every board member in here has received and every staff member in here has received,” said Zenobia, adding that the motion was being made “under duress, under threats of intimidation.”

Zenobia called for the School Board not to “buckle under pressure of a national mob for lack of a better word…I would implore everyone here for this board to find their fortitude and spine and sit up and say we are not going to be bullied nationally and even locally that now we are going to take away our decisions that we have made with the best intent..if we do that, this whole program will fall apart. We won’t get the support from the community. We won’t get people volunteering.” He said some of the bullies posted children’s pictures online.

“To sit here and pretend like we’re not making this decision under stress is ridiculous. It’s wrong for us to do,” Zenobia said.

Zenobia said the “progressive socialist left brutalized mothers who sit on this board.” He said the mob would move on to other issues.

“The Washington Post and everyone else who piled on this story brutalized moms with children in this district for political gain,” he said. “It’s disgraceful and despicable what’s happened.” He added, “People believed the lies the media spread. It was a politically driven firestorm.”

Board member Kelly Piacsek said that most emails she received wished harm for her and her family. “The facts have not changed since June,” she said, adding that three of the neediest schools already qualified for free meals for all students regardless of income level, a point lost in news coverage.

“Facts are actually not what got us here tonight. We are here because of coercion, intimidation, threats, aimed at our families,” she said. “Deliberately inaccurate information and twisting of words to villainize this board becomes an erroneous headline in the Washington Post.” Facebook censored community members’ posts who tried to correct misstatements of facts, she said, and The Washington Post put a “horrible headline behind a paywall and put it on Twitter.”

The Democratic Party is fundraising on this issue, Piacsek said. “I am so disappointed with this community right now. I have had the Waukesha Police Department at my house all weekend long. My children’s pictures were posted on Twitter,” she said. She asked where the state Department of Public Instruction was regarding the threats against School Board members.

She called the universal free lunches “federally backed perks to high income students.” Students can’t even pay for meals if they want to, she noted, adding that “the same people complaining about this also complain about the privileges of the most advantaged. Think how much more good we could do with our food service resources if they weren’t wasted on families that had the means to pay.”

“It is disgusting and inexcusable to me that the vile threats to my family and our jobs have been accelerated on a national stage by members of our own community,” continued Piacsek. “If this is how it’s going to go from now on, school board members know this, you are to consult with the Washington Post, Twitter, and Facebook before you make your decisions. This is not local control. It’s bad for our district. It’s bad for American schools. When the federal government is responsible for feeding all students at all times regardless of need, they have ultimate authority and we don’t need local school boards anymore. This is how we got CRT and filthy books and mask mandates and all of this stuff.”

She said rescinding the vote would mean the school board “is beholden to a mob.”

She called the universal free lunches “handouts for high-income families,” calling it irresponsible. The resources could be shifted to help the low-income, she said.

“This isn’t about food anymore. So here we are, neck-deep in cancel culture. Never did I in a million years think my family would be doxxed,” she added.

The threats came on the backs of sometimes biased media coverage; some news outlets ran stories telling readers the School Board didn’t want to offer free lunches anymore, without mentioning the board was switching back to a pre-pandemic program that gives free lunches to children who meet income guidelines. In other words, poor kids would still get free lunches.

The board has now gone back to the universal free lunch approach, meaning even rich kids will get free lunches paid by the federal government.

“A lot of people have referenced that we are not feeding kids,” said Clark. “That was never a discussion. It was not included in the action. We were simply returning to a plan we were using before pre-pandemic.”


Supporting Switching

James Sebert, Superintendent of Schools, said the administration’s position was that the School Board should go back to the universal free lunch for all program because doing so “will help families who may not qualify for free and reduced lunch but are also experiencing situational poverty due to the pandemic.”

Greg Deets was one board member who switched his vote. “Upon reflection I made the earlier votes without really looking at the implications. I wasn’t really informed, and I apologize to that,” he said. “It’s a reminder to me that our votes are really far reaching. The truth is that many of our students are hungry throughout the school day, and we have the ability to do something about that. Many families are just above the threshold for applying for reduced lunch.” Some families who would qualify don’t because “sometimes pride gets in the way.” He said he received about 500-600 emails.

School board member Bill Baumgart said that some kids would go unfed without universal free lunch because all of the parents don’t apply. He said teachers supported the rescinding of the vote. “I didn’t pay as much attention as I should of. We voted nine to nothing because that was probably an easy thing to do. In retrospect I wish I hadn’t,” Baumgart said. He claimed he didn’t change his vote because of the “mob scene,” which he called “terrible.”

Board member Amanda Roddy said she wasn’t switching her vote because of the mob but rather because of “the conviction of my personal beliefs.”


The Spoiled Comment

One comment taken out of context drove a lot of the negative news coverage and subsequent fury, a reference people being “spoiled” by universal free lunches for all.

“Wisconsin school board blasted for saying kids might get ‘spoiled’ by free lunch,” read the headline in the New York Post. The Huffington Post snarled, “Wisconsin School District Rejects Universal Free Lunches So Kids Won’t Get ‘Spoiled.'” Daily Beast huffed, “Wisconsin School District Ditches Free Meals So Students Don’t ‘Become Spoiled.'” The Daily Beast story started with this line, “In a cruel move that has shocked many parents, the Waukesha School District Board opted earlier this year to end its federally funded program to give free meals to all student…”

But what did the board member really say? Here is the FULL quote from that board member, per Patch. Many stories mentioned only the “become spoiled” part without providing the full quote:

“I had three kids, I had them and so I’m going to feed them. I feel like that’s the responsibility of the adult,” Karin Rajnicek, a board member said. “I feel like this is a big problem, and it’s really easy to get sucked into and become spoiled and think, it’s not my problem any more, it’s everyone else’s problem to feed my children.”

On Aug. 30, Rajnicek gave a lengthy, emotional speech at the special meeting, describing various hardships her family had suffered throughout the years and saying that her comments “were taken out of context.”

She noted that there are 300 homeless students in the School District and 35% of students are at or below the poverty level but “they can always have something to eat.”

She said the media purposely took her words out of context. “The spoiled I referred to is me, it’s all of us, if we rely on the system when we can provide for ourselves. If we don’t start saying no to our government handing out more money, we will never get out from under,” and programs will no longer exist for those who truly need them, she said.

“All we did was go back to the program we had in place before the pandemic,” she said. “This is one big game of telephone that might cost some of us our businesses.”

She said board members received thousands of emails, texts and voicemails “every 30 seconds trying to silence me and all of us” and her “five-star business” was flooded with bad reviews. She had to install security cameras at her home and get “legal help to try to dig my business out of this home.” She needed police presence. “Most of this is political,” she said.

Other Nuances

The district had previously indicated the June change was partly made out of a concern that declining applications could affect other funding, a point that didn’t make it into many news stories.

The district noted, “Deciding not to participate in the SFSP does not mean we are not providing for our neediest students. The District will be returning to the National School Lunch program (free/reduced lunch program) that has served students across this country for decades. We will still continue to have universal free breakfast at the schools that meet the program qualifications. We will continue to work directly with families on an individual basis.”

The district said a lot of free breakfasts ended up “in the trash,” and summer participation indicated lowering demand for free meals.

The district also noted that although the news stories stated that the District was the only one in the state choosing to leave (note the semantics) the universal free lunch program, that does not mean it’s the only one that doesn’t participate in it. There are districts (or just their high schools) in the state “that don’t participate in any federal lunch program that will likely not participate in the SFSP (universal free lunch),” says the district.

Another important detail, left out of many, if not most, stories. According to the Associated Press, “In addition, as was practice before the pandemic, young students in grades lower than high school who come to school without a packed lunch, money or an accepted lunch program application, may be given cheaper meals of cheese sandwiches.” That’s in addition to the fact they can still apply for nutritious free lunches if their families apply for the pre-pandemic program. The Journal Sentinel reported that guardians would be charged for these, but it would ensure that no kid goes hungry.

But you wouldn’t know any of this if you were a reader of this online story by WISN-TV, which reported: “Some parents want Waukesha schools to reconsider a decision to turn down federal funding for free school lunches.” Nowhere in this story does it bother to mention that low-income kids would still qualify for free Waukesha school lunches.

WTMJ-TV ran an online story from the Associated Press that similarly did not mention that low-income kids would still qualify for free Waukesha school lunches (media outlets sometimes shorten AP stories to fit their own news holes, but they shouldn’t do so in a way that twists stories by removing key context).
=

nathan peskie

Nathan Peskie, DCI Special Agent, EXONERATED by Dane County DA

Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne has exonerated a DCI special agent, Nathan Peskie, in...
trump's valuation problems

Biden’s DOJ Authorized ‘Lethal Force’ Against President Trump in Mar-a-Lago Raid

President Joe Biden's Department of Justice authorized the FBI to use "lethal force" against his...

UW-Milwaukee Chancellor Mark Mone Apologizes But Doesn’t Withdraw Agreement

UW-Milwaukee's chancellor is apologizing for weighing in on geopolitical issues but isn't withdrawing the controversial...

DEBUNKED: False Claim That Eric Hovde Used Antisemitic Slur

Actually, Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin is the Wisconsin U.S. Senate candidate who has taken anti-Israel...
Trump's First Criminal Trial

Prosecutors Rest Their Case Against Trump in Hush Money Trial

State prosecutors rested their case against former President Donald Trump on Monday, capping off four weeks of testimony from 20 witnesses.

The first-ever trial of a former President was one step closer to a conclusion after prosecutors concluded their case Monday. Next up: Trump's attorneys will get a chance to present their defense. The case centered around Trump's alleged sexual encounter with an adult film actress in 2006 and a $130,000 payment to her in 2016 to keep her quiet ahead of the 2016 election. Trump has pleaded not guilty and denied the encounter happened.

Prosecutors allege that Trump covered up the payment to Stormy Daniels and another hush money payment to former Playboy model Karen McDougal ahead of the election and covered them up as legal payments.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records related to money paid to Daniels and McDougal. Bragg has alleged Trump broke New York law when he falsified business records with the intent to commit or conceal another crime.

Prosecutors allege Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors allege the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. Both Cohen and Daniels testified during the trial.

Daniels detailed the alleged 2006 sexual encounter and testified she "blacked out." She also said Trump didn't wear a condom. Defense attorneys asked for a mistrial after that testimony, which they argued was prejudicial.

Judge Juan Merchan denied that motion and repeatedly fined Trump for his comments and social media activity outside of the courtroom. Merchan ordered Trump to pay a total of $10,000 for violations of the gag order.

The gag order remains in place. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about the jurors, witnesses, attorneys, court staff, district attorney staff and family members of staff.

It is not clear if Trump plans to take the stand in his own defense. He previously said he would take the stand if necessary.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

In late March, Trump said that he wasn't worried about a conviction when asked if he thought a conviction could hurt his chances of returning to the White House.

"It could also make me more popular because the people know it's a scam," he said. "It's a Biden trial, there is no trial, there's a Biden trial."

Whatever happens during the trial, Trump will be protected by the U.S. Secret Service.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to retake the White House.

"The Constitution does not bar felons from serving as President," said Richard Hasen, professor of law and political science at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Trump could not pardon himself from any state charges, Hasen said.

Federal Scholarship Program Under Fire For Alleged Bias Against Conservatives

Lawmakers have threatened to revoke the appropriations for a federally-funded scholarship program that an audit found favors liberally leaning students over conservatives by a ratio of 10 to 1.

The Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation was established in the 1970s to award scholarships to students who “demonstrate outstanding potential for and who plan to pursue a career in public service.”

An audit of those scholarships performed by the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, though, reported strong liberal bias at the taxpayer-funded foundation.

“While this role suggests these programs should include scholars who reflect a breadth of views, values, and interests, their participants instead display a stark ideological tilt,” AEI said in its report.

The foundation does have members of both parties on its board, including U.S. Rep. Kay Granger, R-Texas, and U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kans.

Notably, President Joe Biden's Education Secretary Miguel Cardona also sits on the board.

House Republican lawmakers on leadership on the relevant committees sent a letter to foundation Executive Secretary Terry Babcock-Lumish demanding answers.

“Between 2021 and 2023, the Truman Foundation selected 182 Truman winners,” the letter said. “Yet, despite the Truman Foundation’s claims that it ‘supports scholars from a wide range of perspectives, interests, and geographic areas,’ just six recipients espoused interest in a cause traditionally considered conservative-leaning.

“Not a single winner professed interest in causes such as protecting the rights of the unborn or defending the Second Amendment,” the letter continued. “By contrast, the Foundation selected at least 74 winners professing interest in a progressive cause.”

The foundation awards about 60 scholarships every year.

“As a publicly funded award charged with preparing the civic leaders of tomorrow, the Truman Scholarship should, at a bare minimum, be reflective of the country’s breadth of values, viewpoints, and interests,” the letter said. “The Truman Foundation requested approximately $3 million in appropriations for the upcoming fiscal year. However, if the Truman Scholarship functions as a career booster solely for students of a particular political persuasion, it should no longer be worthy of Congressional support, taxpayer funding, or its exalted public image.”

Education and the Workforce Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development Chairman Burgess Owens, R-Utah., and Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Chairman Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., led the letter.

The foundation did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.

fond du lac sheriff

Wisconsin Girl, 12, Escapes From Sexual Assault Suspect Who Entered U.S. Illegally, Sheriff Says

A 12-year-old girl made a dramatic escape in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, from the vehicle...
Young Republicans

In the Midst of Chaos, Young Republicans Answer the Call [WRN VOICES]

By Kyle Schroeder Things are not good for young people in America right now. Inflation is...
uw-milwaukee encampment ends

The UW Board of Regents MUST Rescind the Appalling UW-Milwaukee Encampment Agreement [WRN VOICES]

I have never been more disappointed with leaders at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, where I...
IDs For Illegal Immigrants Wisconsin Proposed Voter ID Rep Binfield wec

Wisconsin Lawmakers Push Questions About IDs For Illegal Immigrants, Voting

(The Center Square) – Some Wisconsin lawmakers are trying to calm fears about illegal immigrants getting IDs and voting in the state.

The Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections and the Senate Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection held a hearing Thursday with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, some local election clerks and Fond du Lac County’s district attorney.

“We're not trying to get anybody into a bad spot here, or in a corner, or make accusations on that level,” Sen. Dan Knodl, R-Germantown, said. “We want our clerks, who are already stressed enough, to know that we are here to be there as an assist to them.”

Rep. Scott Krug, R-Nekoosa, said he wants to make sure voters have faith in Wisconsin’s electoral process.

“This is one of the topics that hit our inboxes quite a bit the last three months or so,” Krug added. “We thought it’s pretty important just to vet it out, to get all the information out to the public.”

The Wisconsin Elections Commission was invited to Thursday’s meeting but didn’t attend because commissioners were having a meeting of their own. But that left lawmakers’ questions unanswered.

Wis-DOT Deputy Secretary Kristina Boardman said Wisconsin is known as a strict voter ID state.

“I want to make very clear that Wis-DOT is required to provide free identification cards for U.S. citizens that request them for the purposes of voting, and that to be eligible for that free identification card one must be a U.S. citizen and at least 17 years of age,” Boardman said. “Wis-DOT staff do not determine voter eligibility or register anyone to vote. Someone who has a Wisconsin ID or a driver's license is eligible to register to vote online, and that information will be confirmed with Wisconsin DMV systems to ensure that the information entered for voter registration is consistent with the DMV's records

Boardman said in Wisconsin, less than a fraction of one percent of ID requests are fraudulent.

“We put together [a] case activity report, assemble all of the documentation that we have, we have the investigator that had the case pull that together, and we do refer that to law enforcement so that they can take whatever action is appropriate,” Boardman added. “We note what statutes we believe may have been violated. And then it's up to law enforcement to take action.”

Evers Drew Congressional Maps Eric Wimberger Republican’s Second Tax Cut evers vetoes evers budget

The Shady Move Gov. Evers Just Pulled in Wisconsin’s 8th Congressional District

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers pulled a shady move the other day, with questionable legality, using...
sen. chris larson

‘Kill With Disregard & Glee’: Sen. Chris Larson Slammed for ‘Dangerous Anti-Police Rhetoric’ on Senate Floor

In debate on the Senate floor yesterday, during National Police Week, State Senator Chris Larson...

Waukesha County Sheriff Eric Severson Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Waukesha County Sheriff Eric Severson has endorsed Jim Piwowarczyk for state Assembly, saying he believes...
Shale Horowitz

Leadership Must Go: UW-Milwaukee Officially Endorses the ‘Genocide’ Blood Libel Against Israel

By: Shale Horowitz, Professor, Political Science - University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee leadership, on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

The Phony Show Trial Against Trump [Up Against the Wall]

I have to admit, this NY trial of Trump over how a legal bill was...

Jewish Groups Slam UW-Milwaukee’s Encampment Agreement as Offensive, ‘Dangerous’

Three major Jewish organizations are slamming UW-Milwaukee's agreement with pro-Palestinian encampment activists, saying it is...
Jay Rothman

UW President Jay Rothman Expresses Disappointment With UW-Milwaukee After Agreement With Protesters

Universities of Wisconsin President Jay Rothman criticized UW-Milwaukee leaders on May 14, saying he was...
Evers Drew Congressional Maps Eric Wimberger Republican’s Second Tax Cut evers vetoes evers budget

Senate Republicans Override Evers’ Vetoes

(The Center Square) – On Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Senate voted to override nine vetoes from Gov. Tony Evers, including the vetoes that scuttled PFAS clean-up money, millions of dollars that were earmarked for hospitals in Eau Claire and Chippewa Falls and a plan that would allow advanced practice registered nurses to work more independently.

“The legislature has passed hundreds of bills to solve problems facing Wisconsin businesses and families. Most of these bills were signed into law, but many were vetoed by a governor more focused on politics than policies that help everyday Wisconsinites,” Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu said Tuesday. “Overriding the governor’s obstructive vetoes is the last, best way to address these critical issues.”

The override votes came one day after Evers sued the legislature over nearly $200 million that is attached to some of his vetoes.

Most of that money is the $125 million that’s supposed to go toward PFAS clean up in Wisconsin.

“For the fifth time this legislative session, I voted to provide Wisconsin families with the largest investment in clean drinking water in state history – five more times than every Democrat legislator in this state combined. The bill that Gov. Evers vetoed (SB 312) would have created a grant program that targets this critical funding to areas of the state most heavily impacted by PFAS contamination while protecting innocent landowners from financial ruin,” Sen Duey Stroebel, R-Cedarburg, said.

Evers has accused the legislature’s budget-writing Joint Finance Committee of obstructing his plans to clean up Wisconsin’s drinking water, and of delaying his other actions across the state.

LeMahieu said Evers is simply playing the game.

“While Gov. Evers plays politics, the legislature will continue to do the right thing on behalf of the people of our state,” LeMahieu added.

Senate Democrats responded with game-playing accusations of their own.

“Coming in to do all these veto overrides was clearly a stunt to try to appeal to voters ahead of the fall election,” Den. Mark Spreitzer, D-Beloit, said. “Clearly Republicans were hearing from things in their district and wanted political cover. I don't think they got political cover today. I think what they got was people realizing just how afraid they are.”

But Tuesday’s veto overrides are largely symbolic.

While Republicans in the Wisconsin Senate have a veto-proof majority, Republicans in the Wisconsin Assembly do not.

trump vs biden

Trump Holds Lead Over Biden Heading Toward November

With less than half a year until the 2024 presidential election, former President Donald Trump holds a sizable lead over incumbent President Joe Biden in several swing states.

While the overall national polling varies and shows a tighter race, Trump holds significant leads in several swing states.

According to Real Clear Politics, Trump leads in a slew of key battleground states like Arizona (+5.2), Georgia (+4.6), Michigan (+0.8), Nevada (+6.2), North Carolina (+5.4), Pennsylvania (+2.0), and Wisconsin (+0.6).

Other polling has shown Trump with a dominant lead in the Sun Belt while performing less well against Biden in some rust belt swing states.

“As the old saying goes, good gets better and bad gets worse, and it’s clear President Biden is in bad shape right now,” Colin Reed, a Republican strategist, former campaign manager for U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., and co-founder of South and Hill Strategies, told The Center Square. “Five and a half months is an eternity in politics, and there’s theoretically still time to right the ship, but it’s getting late early for the president, especially when Father Time remains undefeated and doubts about his age continue to grow. “

According to the Real Clear Politics’ national polling average, Trump leads Biden 46.1% to 44.9%.

A New York Times poll released this week showed leads for Trump in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania but slightly trailing Biden in Wisconsin, raising concerns among supporters.

Trump’s lead has been in large part fueled by minority voters flocking to his side.

Meanwhile, Biden’s approval rating has plummeted since taking office. While that is not unusual for incumbents, Biden’s approval is lower than recent presidents.

Gallup recently released polling data showing that in the 13th quarter of Biden’s presidency, he averaged a 38.7% approval rating, worse than Trump at the same time in his term.

“None of the other nine presidents elected to their first term since Dwight Eisenhower had a lower 13th-quarter average than Biden,” Gallup said.

Axios reported this week that Biden and his team think the polls don’t represent Americans’ actual feelings and that the president’s position is strong.

“They're still 50% (well 45%) to win, per betting markets,” pollster Nate Silver wrote on X. “But Biden has been behind Trump in polls for a year now. His approval is in the tank, and voters have been clear they think he's too old. If Trump wins, history will not remember Biden kindly.”

Meanwhile, Trump spends valuable campaign time in a series of court appearances for his myriad of federal prosecution court dates.

“I’m under a gag order,” Trump told reporters after a court appearance Tuesday. “Nobody has actually seen anything like it ... I'm beating him in every poll and I have a gag order, so I think it's totally unconstitutional."

Republicans have blasted Biden for Trump’s prosecution, accusing Biden of using the Justice Department against his political opponent.

“Despite Far Left Democrats’ illegal election interference, President Trump is beating Joe Biden in the polls!” Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., wrote on X Tuesday. “Voters see right through the sham Biden Trials and know President Trump is the best choice for president.”

uw-madison

What UW-Madison’s Graduation Got Right & Wrong [Up Against the Wall]

I have a love-hate relationship with the UW-Madison. On one hand, I love the university;...