Wednesday, April 24, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Darrell Brooks: Milwaukee County Judge David Feiss Hoped Low Bail ‘Gets Him Out’ Due to Trial Delays

spot_img

The Milwaukee Court system is STILL limiting how many courtrooms can conduct jury trials, despite a judge setting Darrell Brooks’ bail at $500 in a pending felony case because he couldn’t give him a trial due to court congestion and limited trials.

Milwaukee County Circuit Judge David Feiss said in Darrell Brooks’ bail hearing for a shooting case that he was setting Brooks’ bail at an amount so low – $500 – because he hoped it “gets him out,” referring to the man later accused in the Waukesha parade massacre.

David feiss
Milwaukee county circuit judge david feiss

“I can tell you that I’m setting it at that amount with the hope that Mr. Brooks is able to post that amount. That gets him out, but also provides some community protection,” David Feiss said during the February, 2021, court hearing. Brooks was accused of shooting at a car carrying a relative during an argument; as a felon multiple times over, it was illegal for him to even have the gun.

Brooks did get out. And he got out again after being charged later with another felony case in Milwaukee County. He was free on bail in both still-pending cases at the time of the Waukesha Christmas parade massacre. If the court had been able to try Brooks and Brooks had been convicted and sentenced, he may not have been free to commit the massacre.

But Judge David Feiss, a former prosecutor, made it clear why he wanted to make sure he set bail at a figure Brooks could afford to post: He said that courts were only operating at close to 25% capacity at the time of the bail hearing, in February 2021, and officials weren’t holding any trials on Wednesdays; as a result, he expressed concern about the court system’s inability to meet Brooks’ speedy trial rights as his jury trial had been delayed again and again. In short, the judge, faced with Brooks’ constitutional rights clashing with court officials’ decision to limit jury trials due to COVID, appeared to feel he had no other choice. Feiss was not responsible for overall court scheduling, and, certainly, the limitations put judges in a bind as court officials balanced competing public safety concerns, sometimes tilting toward protecting people from COVID over protecting them from accused criminals like Brooks.

That’s according to a transcript of the bail hearing requested by Wisconsin Right Now from the court reporter, Kelly Janowski. It’s the first time the transcript has been reported, shedding more light on why Feiss gave Brooks such a low bail in a serious felony case.

“And I guess for the record under 971.10 I’m going to find that certainly court congestion is a factor today but it’s not the sole factor, and that’s the reason for the court continuing cash bail at a reduced amount,” Feiss said. “As prosecutors have pointed out to me when I indicated we were at 50 percent trial capacity, compared to pre-Covid we are actually closer to 25 percent because we don’t set any Wednesday trials. So the inability to try Mr. Brooks’ case, as I indicated court congestion is a factor but it’s not the sole factor.”

Feiss outlined the many delays in the case during the bail hearing. Simply put, the court system was unable to give Brooks a jury trial in a case that had dragged on since July 2020 (and is still pending.)

David feiss

“I’m not able to try Mr. Brooks’ case. So we are going to need to set a new trial date, and we are also going to need to discuss bail,” Judge David Feiss said. Feiss noted he had already reduced Brooks’ bail from $10,000 to $7,500 and said, “This is now the second speedy trial date. The court hasn’t been able to try Mr. Brooks’ case.”

Defendants have a right to a speedy trial under the 6th Amendment to the US Constitution. The 6th Amendment reads, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial…” The felony charges for shooting at a car carrying a relative were filed against Brooks in July 2020, but even to this day, the case is still pending. He posted the $500 bail on Feb. 26, 2021. There was a pretrial services violation after that date in the Feiss case, and a new felony charge in November before the parade, but bail did not increase.

Feiss said during the hearing that the bail was a “difficult decision” because “these are serious charges. These are serious allegations.” He added, “The other side of that coin is Mr. Brooks entered his speedy trial demand back in August. I have tolled this once. I just don’t think I can continue to toll speedy trial demands indefinitely. You can make the argument that this — our inability to try the case is not due to court congestion because of the limited number of trial dates, but we’ve now set this on a couple of occasions.”

Judge David Feiss explained, “We are on the — We were on the calendar yesterday for speedy jury trial on this case. The court had approximately six or seven speedy trials and detainer cases. The court is currently in trial on a case that was older than Mr. Brooks’ case.” The court picked June 2021 for a new trial date, but that didn’t happen, either. When June came around, the court system still couldn’t give Brooks a trial because of “court congestion.”

We have found other cases in which David Feiss has raised similar concerns. For example, Orlando Walker was charged with first-degree reckless injury with a dangerous weapon and being a felon in possession of a firearm in June of 2020. His case remains pending.

Bail was originally set at $75,000 cash. As the case wound through the court system slowly, Feiss reduced his bail to $35,000. Feiss denied the defense’s request to modify bail and tolled speedy trial limits. The state asked for delays for things like new evidence. On June 11, 2021, Feiss allowed Walker to go free on a signature bond. On Dec. 3, Feiss denied a state’s request to increase bail.

Even today, jury trials are limited in Milwaukee County

We interviewed Milwaukee County Chief Judge Mary Triggiano recently about court scheduling. She said that there are about 350 people seeking speedy trials who have not been given them yet, although not all will eventually go as some might reach deals. She said that judges can toll “time limits” and not honor speedy trials due to COVID-19 and “that was happening in the pandemic.”

Darrell Brooks was one of those cases.

She said that every courtroom is still not conducting jury trials, even to this day. However, she said the number of jury trials held each week has steadily grown as the courts slowly reopen. There were two on average per week when the pandemic first hit and then 4 and then 7 and now the courts are up to about 10 jury trials per week, she said. That compares to about 12 per week before the pandemic, meaning the courts are still not operating at full capacity on jury trials despite the backlog.

David feiss
Milwaukee county chief judge mary triggiano

“There is still limited capacity to do jury trials,” she confirmed, stating that there are 10 courtrooms allowed to hold jury trials right now and all of the judges are sharing them. There are 21 criminal judges. She said some courtrooms are too small to social distance.

“The backlog is mostly in the jury trials,” she said because those can’t be handled on Zoom (there is a 1,600 felony case backlog and 3,100 misdemeanor case backlog). Triggiano said all judges will be able to hold jury trials in their courtrooms starting January 3, 2022. She said that scheduling concerns with subpoenas and getting enough jurors plays a role in that delay.

“We were prepared to have all judges do jury trials in their courtrooms and then the Delta variant hit Sept. 7,” she told WRN.

At the time of the parade, Brooks was also out on $1,000 bail set by Court Commissioner Cedric Cornwall for allegedly running a woman over with his car at a gas station, a new case charged about three weeks before the parade massacre. That – as well as Waukesha Court Commissioner David Herring’s refusal to jail Brooks in a child support case despite a lawyer’s request that he do so – left Brooks free to attack the parade.

Cornwall has been reassigned out of criminal court. Feiss is an elected official.

Darrell brooks criminal record

However, the earlier bail hearing presided over by Feiss has been less scrutinized.

We’ve previously written about the massive two-year backlog in the court system, caused in part by court officials limiting jury trials to only some courtrooms because of COVID-19.

In addition, although all judges could be back in their courtrooms as of early September, not all are doing in-person court each day, Triggiano said, reading from a judicial rotation that shows this varies widely by judge “1 DV judge is doing in person all week in their assigned courtroom,” Triggiano said.  “A homicide and sexual assault judge is doing 3 days out of the 5. 1 judge is doing 2 out of the 5. Another judge that is doing 3 out of 5. Another judge has 5 out of 5 in-person court.” Until Sept. 7, 2021, there was “limited in-person,” and judges were sharing courtrooms as not all were allowed to be open. Now they’re just limited on jury trials but not all are in person every day. Of course, not all hearings have the same impact on public safety if they are on zoom; scheduling conferences, for example, can be handled on zoom but jury trials can’t.

The role of Kaul’s prosecutor

The transcript also reveals that a prosecutor who works for Attorney General Josh Kaul appeared at the hearing for the state where Feiss reduced Brooks’ bail to $500. He argued that the $7,500 bail already in place for Brooks was “appropriately set.” The prosecutor, Jacob Corr, did not tell the judge that Brooks had an active Nevada warrant as a non-compliant registered sex offender, the transcript shows.

David feiss
Assistant attorney general jacob corr

Kaul has received almost no scrutiny in the Brooks’ controversy. Rather, almost all of the focus in the media has been directed at Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, for his prosecutor’s $1,000 bail recommendation in Brooks’ second felony case (the transcript and recording for that hearing do not exist).

Jacob Corr is an assistant attorney general with the state Department of Justice, which is run by Kaul. He is assigned to help out the Milwaukee DA’s office with violent crimes.

The court records do indicate the state had made an offer to Brooks; we asked Kaul and Corr what that offer was and neither responded.

The case in Judge David Feiss’s courtroom was still pending at the time of the massacre at the Christmas parade.

Read the criminal complaint here.

During the hearing, the defense attorney, Joseph Domask, asked for a $7,500 signature bond. That would have meant that Brooks wouldn’t have had to post any cash to get out.

Corr argued that “bail should remain.”

He said: “Judge, I think that bail should remain. I think that it’s not for — I mean obviously the state was prepared to go. The defense was prepared to go. I’ve got two cooperative victims in this case who are very adamant about Mr. Brooks being held accountable for his actions. Both of them want to see Mr. Brooks prosecuted for this case. So they’re concerned about this. Mr. Brooks does have some criminal history albeit mostly kind of — It looks like some DV and drug cases, things like that. He does have it looks like a misdemeanor bail jumping from 2012 which would go to his — kind of his following of court orders. But the state feels that bail is appropriately set.”

This is Brooks’ criminal history in Wisconsin. He also was a registered sex offender in Nevada.

Bail jumping (misdemeanor) and marijuana possession (misdemeanor). 2011.
Marijuana possession second plus offense (felony), 2011.
Obstruct an officer (misdemeanor), 2005 and 2003.
Marijuana possession (felony), 2002.
Substantial battery (felony), 1999.

He has a lengthy Wisconsin arrest history. Read it here. It notes that Brooks has an out-of-state felony conviction.

David feiss

Corr said, “Judge, one other point I would make. Just so the court is aware, from the purposes of the state’s perspective, Mr. Brooks — There is an admission as least as to the felon in possession. So I think that the strength of the state’s case is also something to consider. He does admit that — ultimately admits to firing the firearm, but he denies firing it at the victim. He says he fired it into the ground. Again, that’s something I think the court should be aware of.”

On Feb. 26, 2021, David Feiss held another hearing solely to see whether Brooks was able to post the $500 bail. It was also attended by Corr, but he didn’t argue for higher bail during that hearing.

Defense attorney Domask told Judge David Feiss, “There was some sort of child support issue in Waukesha and he may have been transferred to Waukesha County Jail.” We previously wrote about that case here. It resulted in a court commissioner, David Herring, rejecting a child support attorney for the state’s request to hold Brooks in jail because of repeated non-appearances and non-payment.

Judge David Feiss noted that after checking with his deputy he learned “that their system shows him out on bail on this charge and he did have the Waukesha hold. My suggestion is that we set another status date just to I guess make sure that he’s out and that — Because we have a June 28th trial date.”

Corr did not object and said very little during that hearing. June 28 came and went without a jury trial.

Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...

Rep. Janel Brandtjen: Threats to WEC Chief Don’t Help

(The Center Square) – One of the biggest critics of Wisconsin’s election administrator says no one should be threatening her and says threats don’t help fix election integrity issues.

State Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, on Tuesday offered her thoughts after the Wisconsin Elections Commission confirmed elections administrator Meagan Wolfe is receiving extra security protection.

"Threatening Administrator Meagan Wolfe, or any election official, is unacceptable and counterproductive. Venting frustrations on individuals like Wolfe, clerks, or poll workers is not only illegal but also harmful to rebuilding trust in our elections,” Brandtjen said. “Threats only undermine our republic and empower the courts and media. It's essential to address any concerns about election processes through legal channels. Threats have no place in our democracy.”

Brandtjen has been one of Wisconsin’s loudest critics of Wolfe. She led hearings as far back as 2021 into Wolfe’s role in the 2020 election. Brandtjen also led the push to get Wolfe removed from the Elections Commission.

“Wolfe’s term has indeed expired, and according to Wisconsin Statutes 15.61(1)(b)1, she should be removed, but Republicans are too worried about the press or too compromised to follow existing law.” Brandtjen said.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Monday clarified that Wolfe is receiving extra security but refused to offer any details.

“The Wisconsin Elections Commission has had productive conversations about safety and security with state leadership, including the governor’s office, which is tasked with approving security measures for state government officials,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind said in a statement. “Those conversations have resulted in additional security measures being approved for Administrator Wolfe and the WEC when the need arises.”

Brandtjen on Tuesday blamed Wisconsin Republicans, and once again blamed Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, for Wolfe’s continued time on the Elections Commission.

“It's disappointing that Sen. Dan Knodl and Rep. Scott Krug, chairs of the election committees, have not exercised their investigative and subpoena powers. This inaction has allowed the neglect of essential laws, such as providing ballots to individuals declared incompetent, lack of checks in military ballot requests, an insecure online system, and improper guidance on voting for homeless individuals without proper documentation,” she said. “The Legislature, particularly Speaker Vos' control, is responsible for the frustration caused by election irregularities due to their inaction.”

Wisconsin’s local election managers have reported an uptick in threats and angry rhetoric since the 2020 election, and some local election offices have taken extra precautions. But there haven’t been any cases in Wisconsin where someone has acted on an election threat.

Wisconsin’s Largest Business Group Sues Over Evers’ 400-year School Funding Veto

(The Center Square) – There is now a legal challenge to Gov. Tony Evers’ 400-year school funding veto.

The WMC Litigation Center on Monday asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take up their challenge to the governor’s summer veto that increased per-pupil funding for the next four centuries.

“At issue is Gov. Evers’ use of the so-called ‘Vanna White’ or ‘pick-a-letter’ veto,” the group said in a statement. “The governor creatively eliminated specific numbers in a portion of the budget bill that was meant to increase the property tax levy limit for school districts in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 fiscal years. By striking individual digits, the levy limit would instead be increased from the years 2023 to 2425 – or four centuries into the future.”

The WMC Litigation Center is an affiliate of Wisconsin Manufactures & Commerce (WMC), the combined state chamber and manufacturers’ association.

Litigation Center Executive Director Scott Rosenow said while Wisconsin’s governor has an incredibly powerful veto pen, there are limits.

“No Wisconsin governor has the authority to strike individual letters or digits to form a new word or number, except when reducing appropriations,” Rosenow said. “This action is not only unconstitutional on its face, but it is undemocratic because this specific partial veto allows school districts to raise property taxes for the next 400 years without voter approval.”

Wisconsin lawmakers and voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1990 that put limits on the governor’s veto power.

Rosenow and the WMC Litigation Center say the governor’s veto goes beyond those limits.

The legal challenge also raises the constitutional issue that all state spending has to originate with, and be approved by, the legislature.

“In no uncertain terms, 402 years is not less than or part of the two-year duration approved by the Legislature – it is far more,” concluded Rosenow. “The governor overstepped his authority with this partial veto, at the expense of taxpayers, and we believe oversight by the Court is necessary.”

The WMC Litigation Center is asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case as quickly as possible.

Let’s Thank Rep. August, Sen. Wimberger, & WI Voters For Ending Zuckerbucks

Remember when Elon Musk challenged Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match? That fight between Twitter/Threads billionaires...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

‘Scam Trial’: Trump Slams Judge, Says He May Not Let Him Go to Son’s Graduation, Campaign

"This is about election interference; that’s all it’s about" - former President Donald Trump. Former President...
Tammy Baldwin's History

Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin’s History of Going Soft on Iran Draws Renewed Scrunity

In 2012, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, then a U.S....
Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

WILL Says State Agency Acted ‘Unlawfully’ Against Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

"State agency acting unlawfully, enforcing illegally adopted policy to his detriment and potentially hundreds of...