I went to the WISDOM Democrat governor candidate forum in Pewaukee today because it was 10 minutes from my house. Well, the Democrat governor...

I like World War 2 movies. Hollywood doesn’t generally mess this genre up by filling WW2 movies with woke BS, as we are all...

Disclosure Day was good in concept but was failed by its script. It’s a Steven Spielberg movie about extra-terrestrials! I’m a child of the...

The Death of Robin Hood Movie Review: Short version Interminably boring for at least 40 minutes, this is a revisionist, dark take on Robin Hood...

Read about the biggest government scandal that legacy newspapers won’t touch. By U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) On April 29, 2026, as Chairman of the Senate...

Will Martin is the Republican Party-endorsed candidate for Wisconsin lieutenant governor. The primary is in August. Wisconsin, the Republican Party, and Juneteenth hold a special...

“Government officials should not be allowed to police the private conversations I have with my clients who voluntarily seek out my advice as a...

"Republicans fought to deliver meaningful investments in rural health care, and I'm proud to have helped make it happen" - U.S. Rep. Derrick Van...

It's Father's Day, and Tom Tiffany is a father of three. We've previously opined that he's basically the "state dad," a common sense figure...

Contrary to the media’s outraged reporting, Tom Tiffany and likely Republican lieutenant governor candidate Will Martin did NOT split over Juneteenth Day, which honors...

Josh Kaul, the laziest attorney general Wisconsin ever had (which is saying a lot since JB Van Hollen was hardly a firestorm of ambition),...

I went for a five-mile walk inside Brookfield Square Mall today because it was raining, and, wow, has that place gone downhill. It’s a...

'The Normandy-area folks are deeply aware of the fact that if not for the 2,500 brave young men who stormed those beaches on June...

In a state where elections turn on 10,000-30,000 votes, every vote really matters. One county stands out dramatically in Wisconsin vote totals, wildly swinging toward...

Advice for Democrats. Stop posting about fish, talking about fish, and holding fish on camera if you don’t really know anything about fish and...

Youthful Wisconsin congressional candidate Mike Alfonso’s online buddies have started comparing him to the Founding Fathers. It’s bad enough that they think the Marathon...

Farming is starting to define the Wisconsin governor’s race. That’s probably a good thing for Tom Tiffany because he actually grew up on one,...

Michael Chernin, the lawyer for Democrat state Rep. Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D-Milwaukee), is blasting a new filing by the Assembly Democratic Campaign Committee seeking to...

What do state Rep. Sylvia Ortiz-Velez and upstart gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong have in common? They’re both outspoken anti-establishment Democrat minority women who are...

(The Center Square) – A conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court justice called the courts’ decision to hear a case challenging the state’s congressional maps doing the “bidding of its political masters” rather than a proper decision.

The court sent an order stating that it would hear an appeal of a three-judge panel’s ruling not to hear the case but said that it would not hear the case on a requested expedited schedule.

“The Democratic Party bought multiple seats on this court to achieve yet another outcome unobtainable democratically,” Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in dissent.

Bradley joined Justice Annette Ziegler in dissent against hear the case from the Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy that a three-judge panel dismissed on April 28.

“It is indeed rare that I feel compelled to object to hearing a case,” Ziegler wrote. “But here, I have concluded this is too important to stand silent. The public should be informed of the requests afoot and it should have the opportunity to stay abreast of these proceedings.

“And, of course, the briefing and arguments could cause me to conclude that this appeal was proper and relief should be granted. We shall see.”

The majority of judges took offense at Bradley’s insinuation that the decision to hear the case was politically motivated, calling the dissent “false, inappropriate, and disingenuous charges.”

“Deciding to hear a case does not reflect any weighing of the merits of any party’s claims, let alone prejudgment about who will prevail and why,” Justice Rebecca Dallet wrote. “We do not prejudge cases, and for that reason, we do not comment at this early stage on the parties’ legal theories, or try to develop arguments in favor of one side or another.”

Ziegler wrote that it was “shocking” the case would be reviewed without analysis of the jurisdiction of the case, if there is a proper claim or if there is even a right to appeal the ruling of a three-judge panel. She pointed to four other times that the Wisconsin Supreme Court had determined that the current congressional map would not be reviewed.