Wednesday, April 24, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Tony Evers Refuses to Condemn Wife Killer’s Parole; GOP Candidates Call on Governor to Remove Parole Commission Chairman

spot_img

Gov. Tony Evers, despite being asked about the looming parole of wife-killer Douglas Balsewicz, has refused to condemn the release and won’t comment on whether he will remove the Wisconsin Parole Commission chairman who granted it.

Wisconsin GOP Candidates are weighing in and blasting Governor Evers and his parole board chairman, John Tate, for Tate’s decision to grant parole to Douglas Balsewicz, who in 1997, broke into his estranged wife’s Milwaukee house and stabbed her 42 times in front of the couple’s toddlers, ages 2 and 4. He left the kids behind with their dead mother and went to Taco Bell. A neighbor later discovered the toddlers, covered in their mother’s blood, walking down the street holding hands.

The Republican candidates for governor – Kevin Nicholson, Tim Michels, and Rebecca Kleefisch – called for the Wisconsin Parole Commission to reverse its decision to release Balsewicz. They also called for Gov. Tony Evers to remove Tate, his appointee, from the Parole Commission. Tim Michels further called upon Evers to halt the granting of parole for the rest of 2022. “The governor should reverse that decision and immediately put a halt to any further grants of parole from his commission in 2022,” Michels said of the Balsewicz case.

Balsewicz parole

Republican Attorney General candidate Eric Toney also called on Evers to remove Tate, saying Balsewicz’s May 17 release date was “a miscarriage of justice.”

In a letter to Evers, Nicholson called on Evers to use his “influence as the Governor of Wisconsin to reverse this horrible decision before his scheduled release date of May 17th.”

Kleefisch called Evers’ parole board an “absolute disgrace.”

Tony Evers’ Parole Commission is releasing the convicted wife killer after just over 1/4th of his sentence, over the objections of the family of the victim, Johanna Rose Balsewicz. Douglas Balsewicz was sentenced to 80 years in prison in 1997 by then Milwaukee County Judge Diane Sykes, who clearly stated at sentencing that she did not want him granted early release. He has served less than 25 years and is only 54. [Read our story detailing the case, family’s outrage, and parole decision here.]

Evers has refused to respond to our repeated questions about the parole, including whether he condemns it. He told WISN-TV previously that he can’t reverse Parole Commission decisions. However, he appointed and can remove the chairman, a former social worker who helped found a group devoted to repealing truth-in-sentencing and other tough-on-crime measures. And certainly, Evers could condemn the parole and call on the commission to reverse it, as the GOP candidates have done. Since he appointed the chairman, his voice would clearly have great weight.

Balsewicz parole

Instead, an Evers’ spokesman did not respond to the Associated Press when the wire service asked whether he would remove Tate. Again, he chose not to condemn the release.

We previously wrote Evers a series of questions and did not hear back. We sent Evers’ press office these questions as a follow-up and have not heard back to them, either:

– Does he condemn or support the release of Douglas Balsewicz? Does he think it was the right decision?
– Will he remove Parole Commission chairman John Tate? Why or why not?
– Will he use his influence and bully pulpit to seek the Parole Commission to reverse its decision to release Balsewicz?
– Does he believe the parole commission should reverse its decision to release Balsewicz?
– Does he have any comment about the various statements given by Kleefisch, Nicholson, Toney, and Michels about the release?

The non-partisan Legislative Reference Bureau confirmed to Wisconsin Right Now that the governor has the unilateral ability to remove Tate, a former social worker with anti-police views, from the Parole Commission. Tate serves at the governor’s pleasure.

We’ve also learned from the Parole Commission that Commissioner Jennifer Kramer first recommended Balsewicz’s release. She was appointed to the commission by Evers’ appointee Tate, who had the final approval, the Commission confirmed to WRN.

Balsewicz parole
The balsewicz toddlers.

“The assigned Commissioner, Jennifer Kramer, assessed that Mr. Balsewicz had satisfied these requirements, and recommended a grant,” the commission stated. “The Chair, John Tate II, as final authority over the Commission, reviewed and approved it (4/27/2022), so this decision is final. This grant has an eligibility date for release of 5/17/2022. The institution will have 30 days from that date to effectuate release.”


We also asked Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul for comment but we did not hear back, either. We will add his comment to this story if it’s received. We are expecting a comment from GOP governor candidate Tim Ramthun soon.

Listen to Johanna sing in 1996 here.

Here are the candidates’ comments:


Rebecca Kleefisch

Balsewicz parole“What do you expect when you prioritize ‘woke’ initiatives like cutting the prison population in half instead of actual public safety? Tony Evers’ parole board has been an absolute disgrace and when I’m governor I will put an end to pro-criminal policies like these by firing liberal activists behind these bad decisions.”

Asked whether Tate should be removed and the parole decision reversed, Kleefisch said yes.


Kevin Nicholson

Balsewicz paroleIn a letter to Governor Evers, Kevin Nicholson wrote,

“Governor Evers,

You campaigned on cutting the prison population in half and pledged to expand the release of inmates. Your appointee to the Parole Commission, John Tate, also has championed releasing more inmates on parole and is openly against mandatory minimum sentencing for violent offenders. These policies have proven to degrade law and order in Wisconsin. This has to stop.

In the case of Douglas Balsewicz, you need to do the right thing. Balsewicz brutally murdered his wife in front of her two young children. This is not someone that can be let out on the streets. Use your authority and influence as the Governor of Wisconsin to reverse this horrible decision before his scheduled release date of May 17th. Wisconsinites will not be safe with Balsewicz out on the streets.

I further call on you to remove your appointee to the Parole Commission, John Tate, for permitting this absurd and horrible decision.

Under Wisconsin state law (17.07(3m)), as Governor, you have unilateral authority to remove the Parole Commission Chairman. It is unacceptable that John Tate serves in his capacity on the board following his decision to allow a violent felon to be released onto our Wisconsin streets. He has dishonored the reputation of the Wisconsin Parole Commission and displayed an incomprehensible lack of leadership.”


Tim Michels

Balsewicz parole“As if soft prosecutors and liberal judges weren’t dangerous enough, now we have Tony Evers’ parole commission letting out someone who should be behind bars for the rest of his life. The governor should reverse that decision and immediately put a halt to any further grants of parole from his commission in 2022. They are clearly unqualified and are making Wisconsin more dangerous.”


Wisconsin AG Candidate Eric Toney

Balsewicz parole“There is no justification for this decision and it is a miscarriage of justice. Tony Evers must condemn this decision and remove the parole commissioner. Sadly, Evers will do nothing because this fits with the liberal soft on crime agenda of Tony Evers and Josh Kaul that has contributed to historic violence and drugs across Wisconsin.”

 


Wisconsin AG Candidate Adam Jarchow

Balsewicz parole“Crime is on the rise across Wisconsin as Democrats fan the flames of violence with harmful rhetoric and policies, yet instead of working to make our streets safer, Tony Evers’ Parole Commission is letting dangerous monsters walk free. This is wrong and must be stopped. It’s time to Make Wisconsin Safe Again, which is why I’ve outlined a plan for backing the badge, funding our brave law enforcement, and returning sanity to our streets.”

 

 


The Wisconsin Parole Commission’s Response to Our Questions on the Release

On May 10, 2022, the Wisconsin Parole Commission responded to questions we asked about the parole by saying the following:

“Mr. Balsewicz was sentenced by the Milwaukee County Circuit Court to an 80-year sentence with parole eligibility, under Wisconsin Statutes 304.06 and PAC 1.05. Under these statutes, the Commission had the authority to grant parole starting at 25% of time served, or after 20 years in this case. Mr. Balsewicz reached this statutory parole-eligibility date in 2017, and was initially denied parole. He was most recently seen by the Commission on 4/14/2022, which was his fifth parole review. There is no technical difference between parole and early release, just a difference in phrasing.

While Mr. Balsewicz was previously parole-eligible, a grant required satisfaction of all five requirements (conduct, programming, risk reduction, time served, and release plan). The assigned Commissioner, Jennifer Kramer, assessed that Mr. Balsewicz had satisfied these requirements, and recommended a grant. The Chair, John Tate II, as final authority over the Commission, reviewed and approved it (4/27/2022), so this decision is final. This grant has an eligibility date for release of 5/17/2022. The institution will have 30 days from that date to effectuate release. The Fox Lake Warden is not directly involved in the parole process.

Victim input is essential to the parole process. The loss of life, and its impacts, weigh heavily on the decisions of the Commission. Registered victims were notified of Mr. Balsewicz’s parole consideration by the Office of Victims Services and Programs (OVSP). They provided statements, which were factored into consideration at this most recent review, and at prior reviews. Notification of his release has been sent to the registered victims. You are correct that such notification is required under state law. In this case, victims contacted the Commission right after the grant was approved and before the notification letters had reached them through the mail. Upon release, Mr. Balsewicz will be carefully monitored by his assigned probation and parole agent under the Division of Community Corrections (DCC) of the Wisconsin DOC. He is to have no contact with the victims or their family members.

With regards to the requirements for a grant, it was noted that Mr. Balsewicz has sustained acceptable institution conduct, with no major conduct reports (the violations you referenced). There were a total of seven minor conduct reports while incarcerated, with the last minor conduct report occurring in 2016. He has satisfied all of his programming needs, as determined at the institution, and which are considered essential to rehabilitation. He has also earned minimum security classification. Finally, he has an approved release plan, as determined by DCC, as well as an outside support network whose letters were also included for consideration. Based on these factors, his risk has been sufficiently reduced. The Commission has determined that the amount of time served is sufficient so as not to diminish the seriousness of the offense.”

Evers Vetoes

Senator Dan Knodl: Evers Vetoes Cast Shadow Over End of Tax Season

For taxpayers, it has been a symbolically momentous week. Tax Day arrived as usual on...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Prosecutors Begin Laying Out Case Against Trump to Jury

Federal prosecutors on Monday began laying out what they say is election fraud in 2016 by former President Donald Trump.

Trump, 77, is the first former U.S. president to be charged with a felony. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented their opening statements to the jury of five women and seven men.

Prosecutors said Trump corrupted the 2016 election, The Hill reported on Monday.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," Manhattan prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said. "The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election, then covered it up."

Trump will spend four days a week in court in New York for the next six to eight weeks on state charges that he disguised hush money payments to two women as legal expenses during the 2016 election. Judge Juan Merchan has not scheduled trial days on Wednesdays.

On Monday, his defense attorneys said he had done nothing wrong.

"President Trump is innocent," Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury. "He did not commit any crimes. The Manhattan district attorney's office should never have brought this case."

Trump pleaded not guilty in April 2023 to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Merchan's gag order remains in place, ordered last month before the trial began. Trump, the nation's 45th president, is prohibited from making or directing others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case or about court staff, district attorney staff or family members of staff.

Prosecutors said Trump's $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels was falsely covered up as a business expense, that the money was to help keep her quiet. Prosecutors say they had a sexual encounter.

Prosecutors also said Trump paid Karen McDougal, a Playboy magazine "Playmate," and reimbursed then attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to cover it up.

"This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior," Colangelo said. "It was election fraud, pure and simple."

Reuters reported that Blanche countered that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg should have never brought the case to trial.

"There's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election" Blanche said. "It's called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea, as if it's a crime."

Prosecutors say Trump falsified internal records kept by his company, hiding the true nature of payments that involve Daniels ($130,000), McDougal ($150,000), and Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen ($420,000). Prosecutors say the money was logged as legal expenses, not reimbursements. In a reversal of past close relationships now pivotal to the prosecution against him, both Cohen and Daniels are expected to testify.

Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony that carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Even if convicted and sentenced to jail, Trump could continue his campaign to return to the White House. He's facing the Democratic incumbent who ousted him in 2020, 81-year-old President Joe Biden.

Trump faces 88 felony charges spread across four cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington.Trump has said the criminal and civil trials he faces are designed to keep him from winning the 2024 rematch versus Biden.

Waukesha County DA Declines Charges in Brandtjen Campaign Finance Case

(The Center Square) – Another local prosecutor declined to bring charges against a Republican state lawmaker in a campaign funding raising case.

Waukesha County’s District Attorney Sue Opper said she would not file charges against state Rep. Janel Brandtjen. But Opper said she is not clearing Brandtjen in the case.

“I am simply concluding that I cannot prove charges against her. While the intercepted communications, such as audio recordings may be compelling in the court of public opinion, they are not in a court of law,” Opper said.

Wisconsin’s Ethics Commission suggested charges against Brandtjen and a handful of others in a case that investigators say saw them move money around to allegedly skirt Wisconsin’s limits on campaign donations.

Opper said the Ethics Commission investigation was based on “reasonable suspicion and then probable cause.” But she added that those “burdens are substantially lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is necessary for a criminal conviction.”

Opper said the Ethic Commission could pursue a civil case against Brandtjen and the others. She also opened the door to other investigations.

“This decision does not clear Rep. Brandtjen of any wrongdoing, there is just not enough evidence to move forward to let a factfinder decide,” Opper said.

She’s the fourth local prosecutor in the state to decide against filing charges.

Jack Smith Enticing Illegal Immigration Overturns Gov Evers Legislative Maps Arizona Elections Cases

Some Good News Out of Court Lately [Up Against the Wall]

Finally, a few correct court decisions. It’s about time. First, out of the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Speaker Johnson

As Threat to Remove Speaker Johnson Looms, Cooler Heads Should Prevail [WRN VOICES]

Trump gets it. We all need to get it. We currently find ourselves in the...
Brad Schimel

Brad Schimel Says He Won’t Repeat Mistakes of Last Supreme Court Race

(The Center Square) – Judge Brad Schmiel says he’s not going to repeat the mistakes of the last supreme court race in Wisconsin.

Schimel told News Talk 1130 WISN’s Jay Weber he isn’t going to politicize the race like liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and he’s not going to ignore his campaign like former conservative Justice Dan Kelly.

Schimel said he can run for the court next year without injecting Republican politics into the court.

“I've had plenty of people on our side that suggested ‘Brad, you just got to do the same.’ No. I cannot do that,” Schimel said. “We still have to respect the rule of law. We still have to respect the Constitution. We still have to respect judicial ethics. I'm not going to go out and promise people what I'm going to do. But I will promise people that they can look at my record, and they know that I've done the right thing. That I have put the law above politics. I put the law above my own personal opinions.”

Republicans roundly criticized Protasiewicz for her comments about abortion and Wisconsin’s state legislative maps during the 2023 campaign.

Republicans also roundly criticized former Justice Dan Kelly, who lost to Protasiewicz, for his perceived lack of campaigning.

“We couldn’t have put a brighter, more reliable conservative on the Wisconsin Supreme Court than Dan Kelly,” Schmiel added. “But, with the campaign there were some mistakes that were made.”

Chief among them, Schimel said, was Kelly’s decision to reject money from the Wisconsin Republican Party that could have gone toward TV ads.

Schimel said that left Kelly at a huge disadvantage.

“Janet Protasiewicz took almost $10 million from the state [Democratic] Party. Dan took the money too late. He realized ‘Oh my gosh, I'm going to get burned on this.’ By the time he took it the best ad buys were gone, and he wasn't able to spend the money effectively,” Schimel said. “He spent $585,000 on TV. That was what his campaign spent. Janet Protasiewicz’s campaign spent $10.5 million. When you are out-spent 20-to-one on TV, you better just start writing your concession speech.”

Schmiel vowed not to be outspent this time around.

“I have made it clear. I will take all legal, ethical contributions to my campaign because we have to win,” Schimel said. “Because we have to stop standing on this hill of principle that we end up dying on.”

Defund NPR

Multiple Bills Introduced in Congress to Defund NPR

Several U.S. House Republicans introduced multiple pieces of legislation to defund National Public Radio following new allegations of “leftist propaganda” from the taxpayer-funded news source.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good, R-Va., Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., introduced similar legislation to prohibit federal funding for NPR, including barring local public radio stations from utilizing money from federal grants to “purchase content or pay dues to NPR.”

Over the years, Republicans have made multiple attempts to defund NPR, citing similar complaints. The latest outrage follows an editorial from former NPR Editor Uri Berliner, who criticized the news source claiming it had "lost America's trust."

Berliner criticized NPR’s coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the COVID-19 lab leak theory and of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as examples of the outlet’s left-leaning bias. He described “the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity.”

Banks took aim at NPR’s new Chief Executive Officer Katherine Maher, who has expressed criticism of the First Amendment in efforts to combat “misinformation.”

“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism. Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars,” said Banks.

The Indiana congressman continued by describing the news outlet as a “liberal looney bin” under prior leadership, drawing attention to a systemic problem.

“It’s time to pull the plug on this national embarrassment. Congress must stop spending other people’s hard-earned money on low grade propaganda,” Banks lamented.

Good was a bit more reserved in his take-down of the news outlet.

“It is bad enough that so many media outlets push their slanted views instead of reporting the news, but it is even more egregious for hardworking taxpayers to be forced to pay for it. National Public Radio has a track record of promoting anti-American narratives on the taxpayer dime,” Good said in a news release. “My legislation would ensure no taxpayer dollars are used to fund the woke, leftist propaganda of National Public Radio.”

Tenney, a former newspaper owner and publisher, accused NPR of using taxpayer funds to “manipulate” and promote a political agenda controlled by “left-wing activists.”

"I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media. These disturbing reports out of NPR confirm what many have known for a long time: NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it," Tenney said in a news release.

The lawmakers cited the political make-up of the NPR’s D.C. news team, which they say includes 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans.

The Center Square uncovered records showing that Maher exclusively donated to Democratic political candidates before her role at NPR. Her largest donation of $1,500 was given to Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello in 2017, and most frequently donated to Virginia state Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, in the amounts of $25 over nine times.

Good underscored the original purpose for the publicly funded news outlet, which he says was “created to be an educational news source and to ‘speak with many voices.’” He added that NPR has now become “a primary outlet for advancing biased and radical media coverage of political and social issues.”

Eric Hovde TIES Wisconsin Senate Race Against Sen. Tammy Baldwin With Likely Voters

It all adds up to one thing: Tammy Baldwin and Joe Biden are in trouble...

Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney Endorses Jim Piwowarczyk for Assembly

Former Republican Attorney General Candidate and Fond du Lac County DA Eric Toney has endorsed...

Senator Ron Johnson to Speak at Concordia University [Canceled]

Update: This event has been canceled. Ron Johnson was held up in Washington DC. The Young...

Israel & Iran – The War Escalates | Up Against the Wall

Well, like I said, the war would escalate so long as Biden shows a lack...
trump, derrick van orden

We Asked a Wisconsin U.S. Rep., ‘What Is Donald Trump Really Like?’ The Answer Will Make You Tear Up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g0YE9DQNL8 "What is Donald Trump really like?" we asked Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican...
derrick van orden

Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden: FISA Amendment Would Have Given Protections to 9/11 Terrorists

https://youtu.be/bzqQ7sgQLec?si=96g0cUP5vc64jCQX Wisconsin Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Republican who served as a Navy SEAL, says he...

The COVID Generation: Let’s Stop Scaring Our Kids [WRN Voices]

As a local school board member, I have witnessed firsthand many of the issues of...

Rep. Janel Brandtjen: Threats to WEC Chief Don’t Help

(The Center Square) – One of the biggest critics of Wisconsin’s election administrator says no one should be threatening her and says threats don’t help fix election integrity issues.

State Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, on Tuesday offered her thoughts after the Wisconsin Elections Commission confirmed elections administrator Meagan Wolfe is receiving extra security protection.

"Threatening Administrator Meagan Wolfe, or any election official, is unacceptable and counterproductive. Venting frustrations on individuals like Wolfe, clerks, or poll workers is not only illegal but also harmful to rebuilding trust in our elections,” Brandtjen said. “Threats only undermine our republic and empower the courts and media. It's essential to address any concerns about election processes through legal channels. Threats have no place in our democracy.”

Brandtjen has been one of Wisconsin’s loudest critics of Wolfe. She led hearings as far back as 2021 into Wolfe’s role in the 2020 election. Brandtjen also led the push to get Wolfe removed from the Elections Commission.

“Wolfe’s term has indeed expired, and according to Wisconsin Statutes 15.61(1)(b)1, she should be removed, but Republicans are too worried about the press or too compromised to follow existing law.” Brandtjen said.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Monday clarified that Wolfe is receiving extra security but refused to offer any details.

“The Wisconsin Elections Commission has had productive conversations about safety and security with state leadership, including the governor’s office, which is tasked with approving security measures for state government officials,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind said in a statement. “Those conversations have resulted in additional security measures being approved for Administrator Wolfe and the WEC when the need arises.”

Brandtjen on Tuesday blamed Wisconsin Republicans, and once again blamed Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, for Wolfe’s continued time on the Elections Commission.

“It's disappointing that Sen. Dan Knodl and Rep. Scott Krug, chairs of the election committees, have not exercised their investigative and subpoena powers. This inaction has allowed the neglect of essential laws, such as providing ballots to individuals declared incompetent, lack of checks in military ballot requests, an insecure online system, and improper guidance on voting for homeless individuals without proper documentation,” she said. “The Legislature, particularly Speaker Vos' control, is responsible for the frustration caused by election irregularities due to their inaction.”

Wisconsin’s local election managers have reported an uptick in threats and angry rhetoric since the 2020 election, and some local election offices have taken extra precautions. But there haven’t been any cases in Wisconsin where someone has acted on an election threat.

Wisconsin’s Largest Business Group Sues Over Evers’ 400-year School Funding Veto

(The Center Square) – There is now a legal challenge to Gov. Tony Evers’ 400-year school funding veto.

The WMC Litigation Center on Monday asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take up their challenge to the governor’s summer veto that increased per-pupil funding for the next four centuries.

“At issue is Gov. Evers’ use of the so-called ‘Vanna White’ or ‘pick-a-letter’ veto,” the group said in a statement. “The governor creatively eliminated specific numbers in a portion of the budget bill that was meant to increase the property tax levy limit for school districts in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 fiscal years. By striking individual digits, the levy limit would instead be increased from the years 2023 to 2425 – or four centuries into the future.”

The WMC Litigation Center is an affiliate of Wisconsin Manufactures & Commerce (WMC), the combined state chamber and manufacturers’ association.

Litigation Center Executive Director Scott Rosenow said while Wisconsin’s governor has an incredibly powerful veto pen, there are limits.

“No Wisconsin governor has the authority to strike individual letters or digits to form a new word or number, except when reducing appropriations,” Rosenow said. “This action is not only unconstitutional on its face, but it is undemocratic because this specific partial veto allows school districts to raise property taxes for the next 400 years without voter approval.”

Wisconsin lawmakers and voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1990 that put limits on the governor’s veto power.

Rosenow and the WMC Litigation Center say the governor’s veto goes beyond those limits.

The legal challenge also raises the constitutional issue that all state spending has to originate with, and be approved by, the legislature.

“In no uncertain terms, 402 years is not less than or part of the two-year duration approved by the Legislature – it is far more,” concluded Rosenow. “The governor overstepped his authority with this partial veto, at the expense of taxpayers, and we believe oversight by the Court is necessary.”

The WMC Litigation Center is asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case as quickly as possible.

Let’s Thank Rep. August, Sen. Wimberger, & WI Voters For Ending Zuckerbucks

Remember when Elon Musk challenged Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match? That fight between Twitter/Threads billionaires...
Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

‘Scam Trial’: Trump Slams Judge, Says He May Not Let Him Go to Son’s Graduation, Campaign

"This is about election interference; that’s all it’s about" - former President Donald Trump. Former President...
Tammy Baldwin's History

Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin’s History of Going Soft on Iran Draws Renewed Scrunity

In 2012, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, then a U.S....
Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

WILL Says State Agency Acted ‘Unlawfully’ Against Part-time Law Enforcement Officer

"State agency acting unlawfully, enforcing illegally adopted policy to his detriment and potentially hundreds of...